Re: [Rpm-maint] Making rpm depend on glib?

2008-02-14 Thread Pixel
Panu Matilainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The questionable part is the size of the thing, it's not exactly trivial: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.1400.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 823936 2008-01-08 05:36 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.1400.5 it's ok for mandriva: - rpm is already

Re: [Rpm-maint] [patch] warnings for rpmExpand(), rpmlog(), rpmGetPath()

2008-02-14 Thread Michal Marek
Panu Matilainen wrote: I also have little doubt that there are a number of other gcc extensions too that would be useful. So instead of littering the headers with #if defined(__GNUC__) __GNUC__ = someversion #endif everywhere, might as well add macros for them centrally someplace, Sure,

Re: [Rpm-maint] Making rpm depend on glib?

2008-02-14 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 18:25 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 12:05 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: Something I've been occasionally thinking of, and was again reminded by looking at the gcc __attribute__() compatibility macros

Re: [Rpm-maint] Making rpm depend on glib?

2008-02-14 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 12:05 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: Something I've been occasionally thinking of, and was again reminded by looking at the gcc __attribute__() compatibility macros of glib. There are vast amounts of things in glib that would be