Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)

The often stated public policy here with RPM4 is "Compatibility with RPM5 is a negative goal." Don't hold your breath for a patch: I will generate and distribute a patch as soon as I understand the full consequences of recent changes to the RPM format. Yes, Yocto issues are well known. The

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)

Regarding using RPM4 to manager RPM5 packages, the reason is that the previous version of the distro was using RPM5. However due to incompatibilities with dnf it was decided by uptream Yocto developers do switch to RPM4. In our Yocto-based distro there are some leftover rpm files that weren't

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)

@n3npq thanks for looking into this. This rpm may be the only one I'll have to deal with and I can regenerate it using rpm4 reasonably easy. However I thought it was important to notify upstream since when other distros update they may face similar problems since they don't have much control

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)

That is a package produced by RPM5: ``` $ /opt/local/bin/rpm -qp --yaml ./capsule-01.00.12-r0.core2_64.rpm | grep Rpmversion Rpmversion: 5.4.16 ``` The package uses a non-repudiable signature and verifies fine: ``` $ /opt/local/bin/rpm -qvvp ./capsule-01.00.12-r0.core2_64.rpm ... D: PUB:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Adding header tag formats to generate UUIDS (#269)

[rpm_uuid.patch.gz](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/files/1163437/rpm_uuid.patch.gz) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Adding header tag formats to generate UUIDS (#269)

UUID's provide a common format for identification and database retrieval. The attached patch adds a header tag format to RPM queries. - UUIDv1 time stamps (for events like build/install times): ``` $ ./rpm -q --qf '%{buildtime:uuidv1}\n' bash c60fd500-bc0a-11e7-804e-003048b801de ``` - UUIDv3

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] replaceSigDigests is only used with IMAEVM. (#268)

The replaceSigDigests function is only used in includeFileSignatures when WITH_IMAEVM is defined. If not warning is generated. Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard (this is same patch as posted to mailing list, sending it here since now we have CI) You can view, comment on, or merge

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-debuginfo.sh: Remove non-allocated NOBITS sections from minisymtab. (#267)

In the minisymtab section (the .gnu_debugdata embedded ELF image) we do not need unallocated sections (except for the SYMTAB and STRTAB sections we are creating). We already remove PROGBITS and NOTES. Also remove NOBITS sections. They should not really take up much (any) space but they still add

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Semaphore CI (#266)

Merged #266. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/266#event-1172459222___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Semaphore CI (#266)

LGTM :shipit: -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/266#issuecomment-316740455___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Semaphore CI (#266)

cgwalters commented on this pull request. > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +FROM fedora +MAINTAINER Igor Gnatenko + +WORKDIR /opt/rpm +COPY . . + +RUN echo -e "deltarpm=0\ninstall_weak_deps=0\ntsflags=nodocs" >> /etc/dnf/dnf.conf +RUN dnf -y update +RUN dnf -y install \ Which

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Semaphore CI (#266)

cgwalters commented on this pull request. > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +FROM fedora +MAINTAINER Igor Gnatenko + +WORKDIR /opt/rpm +COPY . . + +RUN echo -e "deltarpm=0\ninstall_weak_deps=0\ntsflags=nodocs" >> /etc/dnf/dnf.conf +RUN dnf -y update +RUN dnf -y install \ In some

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Semaphore CI (#266)

cc @markoa You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/266 -- Commit Summary -- * add Fedora's Dockerfile for CI * tests: don't copy fstab to chroot * ci: enable silent rules -- File Changes -- A

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] config: Detect major/minor warnings and include the correct system header.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:49:38PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > glibc 2.25 introduced (really long and annoying) warnings for each use > of the major/minor macros from the wrong header: > > lib/cpio.c: In function ‘rpmcpioHeaderWrite’: > lib/cpio.c:245:13: warning: In the GNU C Library, "major"

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python bindings from builddir are not used in tests (#265)

``` ... make[2]: Entering directory '/opt/rpm/python' CC rpmmodule.lo CC header-py.lo CC rpmarchive-py.lo CC rpmds-py.lo CC rpmfd-py.lo CC rpmfi-py.lo CC rpmfiles-py.lo CC rpmkeyring-py.lo CC rpmmi-py.lo CC rpmii-py.lo

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (+PATCH) (#195)

Pushed as #252 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/195#issuecomment-316702937___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (+PATCH) (#195)

Closed #195. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/195#event-1172099300___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (from @n3npq, #195) (#252)

@ffesti Thanks! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/252#issuecomment-316698441___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (from @n3npq, #195) (#252)

Pushed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/252#issuecomment-316698323___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Print exit code with rpm -vv (from @n3npq, #195) (#252)

Closed #252. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/252#event-1172069958___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Do not hardcode "lib/rpm" as the installation path for default config… (#263)

Conan-Kudo requested changes on this pull request. So this can be a problem, because on LSB-compliant 64-bit systems (i.e. most of them running RPM), `${libdir}` is `/usr/lib64`. If we wanted to move it anywhere, we'd probably move it to `${libexecdir}`, since that is static across

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Do not hardcode "lib/rpm" as the installation path for default config… (#263)

…uration and macros. This can be named in various different ways, especially in cross-compilation environments, so let's take it from the build setup. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/263 -- Commit Summary --

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] macros: add %_rpmmacrodir (#262)

It has been used in redhat-rpm-config for long time and some packages depend on it (though without `_` prefix). It's just more convenient than writing %{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d/... Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko You can view, comment on, or merge this pull

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add Travis CI testing environment. (#261)

@markoa \o/ reaching out to you =) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/261#issuecomment-316614406___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add Travis CI testing environment. (#261)

 Hi folks, Semaphore cofounder here. We'd be support RPM with a free account that can run more parallel jobs. Please reach out to us at supp...@semaphoreci.com to discuss. :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on