@n3npq, thanks for your comments.
It's just to add more info:
A possible conflict between package generated by rpm5 x rpm4 was one of our
first hypothesis, however the same issue happens with signed packages generated
by rpm4 (for the yocto-2.3 based system):
```
bash-4.3# rpm5 -qp --yaml
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/271#pullrequestreview-51496403___
Projects that use autoconf are expected to detect
build prerequisites and libraries.
This usually leads to a set of ad hoc de facto m4 macros
that deal with various details like API and path incompatibilities,
much of which is platform and os and distro dependent.
Various standard tools (like
@ignatenkobrain congratulations. Where is the RPM's URL in
https://semaphoreci.com ?
https://semaphoreci.com/rpm-software-management/rpm is 404 not found.
Does Semaphoreci have the configuration file such as `.travis.yml` or
`.circleci/config.yml`?
I want to see the logic to test `rpm` on 4
Pushed.
On 07/19/2017 02:53 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> In the minisymtab section (the .gnu_debugdata embedded ELF image) we
> do not need unallocated sections (except for the SYMTAB and STRTAB
> sections we are creating). We already remove PROGBITS and NOTES. Also
> remove NOBITS sections. They
Pushed.
On 07/19/2017 03:33 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The replaceSigDigests function is only used in includeFileSignatures
> when WITH_IMAEVM is defined. If not warning is generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
> ---
> sign/rpmgensig.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2
Pushed.
On 07/21/2017 01:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 17:06 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> I'm not sure what sys/mkdev.h does, but glibc's sys/sysmacros.h certainly
>> undefines major, minor, and makedev prior to defining its own versions of
>> these macros.
>>
(I hope)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/261#issuecomment-316997466___
Rpm-maint mailing list
So, now we have semaphoreci! Even it doesn't work on PRs (temporary).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
seems like @ffesti already merged this manually
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/267#issuecomment-316997135___
Closed #267.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/267#event-1173846662___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Okay then...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/268#issuecomment-316977080___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@Conan-Kudo no. It's static function in `.c` file.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/268#issuecomment-316976980___
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/268#pullrequestreview-51449448___
Hi,
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 17:06 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> I'm not sure what sys/mkdev.h does, but glibc's sys/sysmacros.h certainly
> undefines major, minor, and makedev prior to defining its own versions of
> these macros.
>
> My guess is that these undefs are not needed.
You are right.
@ignatenkobrain Isn't this public API, though?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/268#issuecomment-316950916___
@Conan-Kudo, please take look to https://github.com/ReOpen/libmdbx/tree/devel
and https://github.com/PositiveTechnologies/libfpta
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
17 matches
Mail list logo