[Rpm-maint] [Suse-patch] Revert provides as obsoletes behavior

. Florian Festi kernel-2.4.21-47.EL.athlon obsoletes kernel-modules provided by kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-47.EL.athlon kernel-2.4.21-47.EL.athlon obsoletes kernel-modules provided by kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-47

Re: [Rpm-maint] Pruning self-dependencies?

Panu Matilainen wrote: On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: As for how many dependencies this would eliminate, running some quick queries [0] against the Fedora primary sqlite metadata database told me it'd be about 7.3% of all dependencies (9246/126066). This is inaccurate (no versions

[Rpm-maint] yum/rpmlib timings: 1000 vs 9000 packages

Hi! As already announced on #yum I am currently playing with really big installations: F8 Everything everything I now have timed various sub tasks in the preprocessing phase of rpmlib. This gives a quite good idea where the problems are. Some of them need to be fixed in yum others in

Re: [Rpm-maint] rpm --aid problem

holmes86 wrote: Appear error message Failed dependencies When I install rpm package with --aid option under FC8. why? Don't do that. --aid is no longer supported (the database used to resolve the dependencies is no longer shipped) and this feature is not working well anyway and will removed

Re: [Rpm-maint] Shortcut on desktop

aneeskA wrote: Hi all, Yet another question regarding placing a shortcut on the desktop of the user who is installing the package. While writing the spec file I found out that you can use the environment variable $HOME in %install section. But when it comes to listing the files in the

Re: [Rpm-maint] Shortcut on desktop

aneeskA wrote: Hi Florian, First of all thanks for replying. I will try to explain the situation clearly. You would have noticed that while installing RPMs like adobe reader after the processing is complete he puts a shortcut on the desktop and also one entry in

Re: [Rpm-maint] upgrade/replace multiple packages with custom package

to sneak in. Florian Festi ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] unexpected file conflict behavior

steven chen wrote: Hi, Good day. Recently I had a weird situation where I can install two rpms together (in one line) without any errors but once I install them one after the other, I got a file conflict errors. When looking closedly, the files that complain about conflicting are actually

[Rpm-maint] [Press release] RPM version 4.6.0 is out

Friday 6th of January 2009 RPM version 4.6.0 was released. The primary focus on this release has been cleaning up the code-base to make it more maintainable and robust, and also more approachable to invite more community involvement. Code duplications, memory handling and various code pieces have

[Rpm-maint] RPM at the Linux Tag 2009 in Berlin

to be targeted in the future. Fell free to announce where you can be found during Linux Tag here or drop me a private mail. Florian Festi [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Berlin_and_LinuxTag_2009_talks ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] restricting content in spec files/pkgs to unicode only

On 07/23/2009 10:35 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: Hi, Looking at this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513459 got me thinking - would it be possible to have rpmbuild check all the content it is going to put into the rpm header to see if it is unicode decodable and abort if it is

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RPMDB Performance

: Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:42:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Switch off fsync while editing the indexes of the rpmdb --- lib/backend/db3.c |7 ++- lib/backend/dbconfig.c |4 lib/rpmdb.c| 23 +++ lib/rpmdb.h

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RPMDB Performance

On 08/11/2009 12:47 PM, devzero2000 wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Florian Festiffe...@redhat.com mailto:ffe...@redhat.com wrote: Any thoughts or safety concerns? Beware of data loss with ext4 dropping down fsync

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] RPMDB Performance

Hi! Very difficult to recover from a zero byte RPMDB Packages file, i think. Overall there is, as always, a tradeoff between performance and integrity. Even with this patch fsync is always called after writes to the Packages file (in opposite to adding nofync to the rpmdb configuration

[Rpm-maint] [RFC][PATCH] Large file support

Muenchen HRB 153243 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera From 4804fcca8a2ee33e60d8a7a042c01443e35b2ae9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:06:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add support for 64 bit file

Re: [Rpm-maint] %logfile option for filelists

On 12/01/2009 06:25 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: Now, that behavior of %ghost is correct for logfiles - but not always correct for other files. I was thinking if we had a %logfile option so those files did not get removed when the pkg was erased and treat %ghost files differently. Changing the

Re: [Rpm-maint] wiki edit rights

On 01/10/2012 11:44 PM, David Greaves wrote: Hi Could I (username lbt) get wiki edit rights please David Done. Florian ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Improve macro table performance

On 01/28/2013 04:05 AM, Alexey Tourbin wrote: In the existing implementation, when a new macro is added, the whole table has to be sorted again. Hence the cost of adding n macros is worse than O(n^2), due to arithmetic progression. This change drops all qsort(3) stuff altogether, by

Re: [Rpm-maint] newly registered user cannot submit new tickets to Trac

On 01/31/2013 01:49 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: Is that an issue with the system? Kindof. We had to close the ticket system due to spam. I added you to the proper group. So creating tickets should work now. I will update the wiki page. Florian ___

Re: [Rpm-maint] Rpm Database musings

On 03/01/2013 05:32 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: (the median is quite different from the avg, that means that some packages are quite big.) ... - That means, if I have 2000 packages installed on my system (which is about the real number), the concatenated headers will use 20 MByte

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM Obsoletes tag not working

On 10/15/2013 01:13 PM, prashant tyagi wrote: Hi Panu, Thanks for quick reply. It worked with 'rpm -U'. I have got another problem in Provides: tag. Hi All, Here is the complete scenario: I have two packages pkgA 10.10.100, pkgB 10.10.100 and I want to merge these into pkgC

[Rpm-maint] Idea of the day

Hi! While discussing updates and version-in-package-names issues (related to a programming language that shall not be named) we came up with the following (completely not thought through) idea: Offer a special character for separating the version number within the package name from the real name

[Rpm-maint] Heads up: Weak and rich dependencies in RPM

Hi! We are currently working on adding weak and rich dependencies to upstream RPM. There are basically two parts: #1 Adding weak dependencies as already used by SuSE and others: Recommends:, Suggests:, Supplements: and Enhances:. We agreed with Michael Schröder to not use SuSE's current

Re: [Rpm-maint] Weak dependencies SUSE compatibility patch

On 02/25/2014 03:25 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: attached is a little patch that I have in my rpm to make --recommends et al work with old SUSE rpms. Thanks! Applied. Florian ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] Weak dependencies SUSE compatibility patch

On 03/11/2014 04:07 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: I also need the following patch to make rpm export the old tags. Pushed with a little tweaking. Florian ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] Upgrade requirements

On 04/17/2014 09:05 AM, Shapiro Ben wrote: Hi all. I've been looking around and trying for some time to create the following situation: I have an application v3.0 packaged and i have to update lots of clients which some have v2.0 installed, some have v1.0. there is major changes between the

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.12.0 alpha released

On 06/29/2014 01:51 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 06/27/2014 04:41 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: - Support for files over 4GB in packages Is the new payload format documented somewhere? It seems to use the FX index in a pseudo-cpio header instead of duplicating the data from the header, but

Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: experiments with rich dependencies

On 09/11/2014 02:18 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: [*] IF-dependencies have similar issues as reverse dependencies: one can break somebody elses dependencies by installing some seemingly unrelated package. Perhaps they should be limited to weak dependencies. That's not exactly the same situation.

Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: experiments with rich dependencies

On 09/11/2014 02:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: Ah, but I was hoping for a discussion of the syntax. Are you ok with the enclosing the rich deps with ()? What about the op names, I'd love to use as 'and' and | as 'or' (which also makes it more like Debian), but I can't think of any good

Re: [Rpm-maint] How to get RPM requires quickly

On 09/15/2014 02:42 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 09/13/2014 04:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: We have a program[1] that needs to take a list of installed RPM package names, and quickly generate all of the installed dependencies (recursively). To get rpm do a bit more work for you, use

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Read uncompressed patches from stdin

Thank you very much for spotting and doing the research. Pushed to master. Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Charles

Re: [Rpm-maint] Identifying which files need signatures

On 01/16/2015 11:18 PM, Fionnuala Gunter wrote: Hi, Missing from the RPM patches that add file signatures is a way for package maintainers to specify which files need signing. Dmitry Kasatkin suggested that we enumerate signed files with a spec tag, similar to how we enumerate files, ie. I

[Rpm-maint] RPM repository moved to GitHub

Hi! We moved your Git repository to GitHub[1] into the rpm-software-management project[2] where a lot of other rpm related repositories already reside. The original repository[3] will stay in place is updated from the GitHub one. If you have a local checkout you can continue to use is read only.

Re: [Rpm-maint] MT compression in rpmbuild ?

On 03/26/2015 12:42 PM, Håkan Olsson wrote: Hello, I’m looking for various ways forward in speeding up RPM build times. In our various build pipelines (Continuous Integration, …) a common resource usage scenario is nice parallel compilations (-j10 or up, etc), after which the build

[Rpm-maint] New Rpm-ecosystem Mailing List

Hi! tl;td: Join at http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem if your interested in any part of the rpm ecosystem. While there are quite some mailing lists already that deal with the different tools around and including rpm we realized that there is no good place to discuss issues that

Re: [Rpm-maint] New Rpm-ecosystem Mailing List

Please forward this mail to anyone that might be interested - especially to rpm related sub projects and groups. Can someone forward this mail to the Mageia folks, please? I signed up to a few MLs to get the message out but I won't start creating account for other distros. Thanks!

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH v7 03/11] Add rpmtags for file signatures and their length

On 07/22/2015 04:30 PM, Fionnuala Gunter wrote: Florian, I'm going to send an updated patch 9. Should I also include this patch to fix test 004, when I resend the patch set? -Fin On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:53 AM Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com mailto:ffe...@redhat.com wrote

[Rpm-maint] RPM 4.13.0-alpha released

Time to wrap things up and stabilize all that changes to a new release. There are two big new features that we hope to get feedback on: * Boolean (aka Rich) Dependencies * File triggers Beside that there are many other fixes, improvements and cleanups. For download information and further

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Some minor localization fixes (#24)

Thanks for taking care. Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/24#issuecomment-156063054___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] brp-python-hardlink: Handle Python 3.5's *.opt-[12].pyc (#16)

Pushed as is. Feel free to file new pull requests for the proposed improvements (We promise to review them faster than this one). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add support for 'patch -o outfile'. (#18)

Closed #18. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/18#event-462274352___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add RubyGems support. (#27)

Pushed to master. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/27#issuecomment-156053073___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix comment for doPatchMacro. (#19)

Thanks for the patch! Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/19#issuecomment-156068222___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix comment for doPatchMacro. (#19)

Closed #19. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/19#event-462300128___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix broken -q on %setup. (#20)

Thanks for the fix! Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/20#issuecomment-156067274___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Various fixes for new pythonegg dependency generator (#23)

Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/23#issuecomment-156154873___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] brp-python-hardlink: Handle Python 3.5's *.opt-[12].pyc (#16)

Closed #16. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/16#event-462402751___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Set up more portable definitions for alternative libc (μClibc and MUSL) (#26)

Thanks for the patch. Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/26#issuecomment-156110294___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Set up more portable definitions for alternative libc (μClibc and MUSL) (#26)

Closed #26. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/26#event-462457432___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.13.0-rc1 released

On 09/02/2015 03:25 PM, Florian Festi wrote: > Time to get 4.13.0 out. Here is the first release candidate. > > There have been quite a few changes since the alpha. The most notable are: > * Finalized syntax for rich dependencies Looks like I messed this one up. Current HEAD is a

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] initial embedded python interpreter support (@rpm5.org derived) (#25)

On 11/19/2015 04:09 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > What is the usecase for this? Isn't this just feature bloat? I kinda agree that this looks like feature bloat. This patch set needs a very good justification to go in upstream. The overall trend is to rather keep minimal installs smaller as this is a

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] brp-python-hardlink: Use cmp instead of sha1summing (#30)

Thanks for the patch! Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/30#issuecomment-158012044___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] pythoneggs.py: flake8 fixes (#31)

Closed #31. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/31#event-468988703___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Xz support improvements (#11)

Closed #11. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/11#event-469206927___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm/transaction: move from __future__ to the top (#72)

Merged #72. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/72#event-687176409___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Various python fixes (#71)

Closed #71. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71#event-687073199___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Various python fixes (#71)

Thanks for the patches. Pushed. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71#issuecomment-224861402___ Rpm-maint mailing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Multi-db /var/lib/rpm and /var/lib/appstore isolation skeleton (#40)

Closed #40. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/40#event-679528736___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Multi-db /var/lib/rpm and /var/lib/appstore isolation skeleton (#40)

I really can't see this changes going in upstream. Beside the duplication of a lot of code, duplication of the API there are lots of unresolved - probably even unnoticed - issues. Including but not limited to: * Support in dependency solvers * UI * Update requiring changes in both DBs *

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Pythoneggs cleanups (#46)

Closed #46. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/46#event-546932390___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] PATCH 4/2013 Reimplement setprogname() and getprogname() to be generic and portable

Looks like this fell through the cracks back then. I can only guess why. May be everyone was on vacation... Anyway this topic came up recently and this looks like the proper solution. Pushed upstream as 61109446ac67ca8f3d96a5592814561db908d83c with only very minor corrections as followup patches.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add RPMCALLBACK_ELEM_PROGRESS callback type (#36)

Pushed. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/36#issuecomment-176251217___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add RPMCALLBACK_ELEM_PROGRESS callback type (#36)

Closed #36. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/36#event-529895073___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add lua function posix.close (#44)

This pull request is not sufficient to fix the problem. For one there is no io.open in rpm's lua so far. Also we probably do not want random scriptlets to mess with with the file descriptors of the rpm process. So this would need some kind of protection (as we already added to exec and exit).

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Unknown tag %ifdef. (#39)

Closed #39. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/39#event-529599270___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Put all Perl-related macros in a single file. (#37)

Not sure if those macro can just be hidden away. We'd need to check how much packages this is going to break before doing such a change. It might be necessary to go the opposite direction (including the macros.perl unconditionally) and leave removing it again to the distros. --- Reply to this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Doc (#48)

Sorry, but the translations are done at https://www.transifex.com/rpm-team/rpm/ Changes to the translation files will just be overwritten. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Doc (#48)

Closed #48. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/48#event-529695803___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fixes for building RPM with BeeCrypt (#61)

Pushed upstream. Github still to stupid to get it. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/61#issuecomment-188681373___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fixes for building RPM with BeeCrypt (#61)

Closed #61. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/61#event-565221851___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Additional fixes for getprogname()/setprogname() on BSD systems (#58)

Closed #58. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/58#event-550543323___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Additional fixes for getprogname()/setprogname() on BSD systems (#58)

Pushed. Thanks for the patch! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/58#issuecomment-184168807___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Add all the BSDs that support setprogname() and getprogname() (#59)

Merged #59. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/59#event-550799360___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix symlinks for installations outside /usr/bin (#60)

I wonder if the easier way to fix this is to actually move the two symlinks to the same directory as the rpm binary... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Support Apache Subversion as SCM in the BUILD arena. (#55)

I am inclined to reject this patch. The danger of missing patches unrecognised outweighs the benefit of using a svn for applying the patches in my opinion. Are there any use cases where using svn really gives a substantial improvement over other tools? --- Reply to this email directly or view

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix symlinks for installations outside /usr/bin (#60)

May be I should have been more clear: What about @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmquery @LN_S@ rpm $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmquery @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmverify @LN_S@ rpm $(DESTDIR)$(rpmbindir)/rpmverify ? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Multi-db /var/lib/rpm and /var/lib/appstore isolation skeleton (#40)

We'll twice a year someone comes up with some sort of dual/multiple rpmdb proposal. None of them so far got beyond answering the first main questions: What's the use case? Would that actually work? Isn't this really the right solution to this problem? Which typically go into some more detailed

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, support legacy pythoneggs()(), and cleanups (#50)

o pull in Python dependencies and requested a way to not break Mageia. After discussing with Florian Festi about it, Mageia's pythonegg(X)(M) will be supported by adding '--legacy' as a switch to generate legacy Provides/Requires to maintain compatibility with Mageia's existing usage and to give t

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] fixes for OS X (#57)

Closed #57. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/57#event-546952766___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] rpm scripts

On 01/26/2016 01:57 PM, tele wrote: > I can not find in source code where rpmbuild trying open scripts > ( for example find-requires ) > Where or how I need looking ? The dependency generator is using file attributes (see fileattrs/ [1]). The code handling those can be found in build/rpmfc.[hc]

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, support legacy pythoneggs()(), and cleanups (#50)

Closed #50. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/50#event-547469932___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Rename to pythonX.Ydist, read .dist-info, support legacy pythoneggs()(), and cleanups (#50)

Ok, squashed the last three commits and adjusted the commit message a bit. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/50#issuecomment-182966562___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] rpmrc.in: introduce e2k arch

On 03/07/2016 12:18 PM, Michael Shigorin wrote: > Hello, > please see the attached patch for e2k (Elbrus 2000) architecture > introduction (there's complete enough support in ALT-RPM but that > will require some porting). I'd rather like to see an actually working patch before committing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix pkgconfig reference to Lua in Libs.private (#64)

Merged #64. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/64#event-593522358___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Use fuzz settings for %autopatch/%autosetup (#63)

Closed #63. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/63#event-593230756___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] rpmrc.in: introduce e2k arch

On 03/07/2016 12:18 PM, Michael Shigorin wrote: > Hello, > please see the attached patch for e2k (Elbrus 2000) architecture > introduction (there's complete enough support in ALT-RPM but that > will require some porting). I can not find any "e2k" in http://git.altlinux.org/gears/r/rpm.git.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Use fuzz settings for %autopatch/%autosetup (#63)

Merged. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/63#issuecomment-197818930___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Make sure CPPFLAGS are setup correctly for finding nspr.h

Thanks for the patch! Added upstream! Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Fix rpmi.at testcase by checking actual datadir and docdir used.

Thanks for the patch! Added upstream! Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] configure --with-external-db should fall back to internal if not specified.

Ops, that mail didn't get to the ML at first... On 03/22/2016 11:25 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 17:17 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> configure.ac implies that there is a fall back to the internal db if >> no external one is specified or found. But that doesn't work since >>

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

This needs to be rebased and cleaned up to go though a second round of review. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-192313529___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Put all Perl-related macros in a single file. (#37)

Closed #37. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/37#event-577883375___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Redundant Python version macro replaced. (#38)

Closing. See #38 for reasoning. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/38#issuecomment-192313053___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm] Fix option parsing in pythondistdeps (#62)

Merged #62. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/62#event-575984943___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

On 03/01/2016 03:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: >> On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to >>> build packages for tes

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Remove anti-cheating protection for --short-circuit

On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes > in a spec file. Would it be sufficient for your use case to change the anti-cheating Requires to something

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 5/5] Fix handling of zero-length file digests

On 04/28/2016 08:20 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 04/27/2016 11:00 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: >> "Rpm-maint" wrote on 04/27/2016 >> 05:45:56 AM: >> >>> >>> I get the following warning: >>> >>> ima.c:23:1: warning: ‘PACKED’ attribute directive ignored

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 4/5] Extend header size to 64MB due to file signatures

On 04/27/2016 09:47 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: > "Rpm-maint" wrote on 04/27/2016 > 05:50:54 AM: > > >> >> Well changing header size limit needs a bit more thought. The main >> problem is that packages with bigger header will look broken on older >> rpm versions

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 0/5] Fix issues related to signed files

On 04/26/2016 12:33 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: > This series of patches fixes several issues related to signed files > produced by rpmsign. Thanks for the patches I already pushed the first few. Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 4/5] Extend header size to 64MB due to file signatures

Well changing header size limit needs a bit more thought. The main problem is that packages with bigger header will look broken on older rpm versions and the usual way of dealing with this (adding rpmlib() Requires) won't work it needs reading the header. Also I wonder if we should increase the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >