Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] License of python-rpm-generators (#471)
LGPLv2.1(+) or GPLv2(+) is fine with me. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/471#issuecomment-485118161___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] License of find-lang.sh is ambiguous around modification (#595)
- [x] @scop ok with relicensing under MIT -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/595#issuecomment-437430364___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Invoke python-macro-helper with -Es python args (#341)
> I don't think that passing -E is good Could you elaborate on that a bit, especially when you think -s /is/ good? Without -s, code from user site packages is loaded, potentially interfering with the commands. Without -E, PYTHONPATH from environment can be used to do exactly the same. (If python3 could be assumed, I would have used -I here. Which BTW is what I did in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506355) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341#issuecomment-339453344___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Invoke python-macro-helper with -Es python args (#341)
To limit environment and user home dir influence. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341 -- Commit Summary -- * Invoke python-macro-helper with -Es python args -- File Changes -- M macros.in (6) M scripts/python-macro-helper (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
@pmatilai @Conan-Kudo ping? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-338811478___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
scop commented on this pull request. > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +#!/usr/bin/python -tt Shouldn't really matter all that much, because the script is invoked with an explicit "outside" interpreter without the shebang affecting anything, but meh... dropped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#discussion_r135551002___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
@scop pushed 1 commit. 9e192ce python-macro-helper: Drop -tt from shebang -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221/files/f4ee9662cf5c0a04e1928487f1480eccc6d598b1..9e192cef134dd149e7813e7fc93bfa193ee95e4a ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
Rebased. @pmatilai ping? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-325380081___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
I don't see how this change would affect that use case at all. Before this
change, the macros were expanded using `%{__python}`, and they still are (the
shebang in the scriptlet is not used).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-311886430___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
Ping? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-310887287___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Spelling fixes (#241)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/241 -- Commit Summary -- * Spelling fixes -- File Changes -- M CHANGES (18) M build/files.c (4) M doc/hacking.doxy.in (2) M doc/librpm.doxy.in (2) M doc/rpmbuild.8 (2) M lib/rpmds.h (6) M lib/rpmrc.c (2) M macros.in (4) M rpmio/macro.c (2) M rpmio/rpmio.c (2) M rpmio/rpmmacro.h (2) M scripts/find-debuginfo.sh (4) M tests/rpmbuildid.at (2) M tools/debugedit.c (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/241.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/241.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/241 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
Combining done, script renamed to python-macro-helper. I think the installation point in rpm's dir structure serves as a prefix/namespace already. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-309346430___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
It'll take me about a week and a half until I'll get back to this. If anyone wants to ahead with this in the meantime, please feel free. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-306988703___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
`python_sitedirs` is otherwise fine, but it will also in its current form be used to retrieve the python version, which seems a bit odd to me. Also, perhaps it will be extended to generate some new other macros in the future. I'm currently thinking along the lines of `python-macrotool` or `python-macro` or `python-macros`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-306803359___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
Oh well, anyway, since it was not my purpose to actually make the sys.stdout -> print changes, they're back to sys.stdout.write in this latest revision. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-303005050___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
Oops, the print stuff is like I said in the macros shipped by Fedora's python-rpm-macros, not here (here they were using sys.stdout.write). But the rest of what I said still stands. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-303003879___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
`.py` suffixes removed. I don't think there's anything fragile about this particular use of `print`, nor does it require the `print_function` import. It is also nothing new, the previous `%python_sitelib` and `%python_sitearch` definitions used it too. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221#issuecomment-303003577___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python macro improvements (#221)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221 -- Commit Summary -- * Use scripts instead of python -c to retrieve %python_* values * Get %python_version from platform.python_version_tuple -- File Changes -- M macros.in (6) M scripts/Makefile.am (2) A scripts/python_sitearch.py (5) A scripts/python_sitelib.py (5) A scripts/python_version.py (5) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/221 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-lang.sh: Add --with-kde KF5 support (#112)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/112 -- Commit Summary -- * find-lang.sh: Add --with-kde KF5 support -- File Changes -- M scripts/find-lang.sh (13) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/112.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/112.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/112 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Various python fixes (#71)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71 -- Commit Summary -- * python: Fix signalsCaught() docstring * python: Trivial code cleanups * python: Remove unnecessary shebang * python: Close file in _f2hdr also if hdrFromFdno fails -- File Changes -- M python/rpm/__init__.py (2) M python/rpm/transaction.py (14) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71.diff --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/71 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Spelling fixes (#70)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/70 -- Commit Summary -- * Spelling fixes -- File Changes -- M doc/rpmspec.8 (2) M lib/rpmfi.c (2) M lib/rpmtriggers.c (2) M misc/rpmxprogname.c (2) M python/rpm/__init__.py (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/70.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/70.diff --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/70 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm] brp-python-hardlink: Use cmp instead of sha1summing (#30)
diffutils is a rpm-build dependency anyway nowadays, e.g. find-debuginfo.sh uses cmp too. See PR #16 for discussion. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/30 -- Commit Summary -- * brp-python-hardlink: Use cmp instead of sha1summing -- File Changes -- M scripts/brp-python-hardlink (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/30.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/30.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/30 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm] pythoneggs.py: flake8 fixes (#31)
...except long lines warnings. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/31 -- Commit Summary -- * pythoneggs.py: flake8 fixes -- File Changes -- M scripts/pythoneggs.py (40) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/31.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/31.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/31 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] perl.{prov,req} improvments
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com wrote: This patch only acknowledges this fact, and allows _ in versions. This results in the underscores also ending up in the Provides. I don't think that's a good thing as IIRC rpm's version comparison does not treat it the same way as perl does. So for example for module version spelled as 0.95_01 the Provides would also be perl($something) = 0.95_01. I suppose allowing the underscore would be ok if it would be sanitized before output, i.e. 0.95_01 would result in Provides perl($something) = 0.9501 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] perl.{prov,req} improvments
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote: Well, 0.95_01 is actually more correct than 0.9501. Perl's versions are actually more or less floating point numbers, thus 0.9501 is supposed to be less than 0.96. From rpm's side, '_' is exactly equivalent to '.', so 0.95_01 is the same as 0.95.01, which is probably what the upstream author indended. I see. I can see how this could work, but there are so many supposeds, probablys, guesses of intent and non-obvious assumptions involved that I'm just grateful that I don't have to be debugging any of this stuff unless I choose to, especially as IIRC there are no regression tests available for these beasts :) ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] python: flake8 cleanups
---
python/rpm/__init__.py| 18 --
python/rpm/transaction.py | 15 ++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/rpm/__init__.py b/python/rpm/__init__.py
index 196be3c..3b750db 100644
--- a/python/rpm/__init__.py
+++ b/python/rpm/__init__.py
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ This module enables you to manipulate rpms and the rpm database.
import warnings
-import os
from rpm._rpm import *
from rpm.transaction import *
import rpm._rpm as _rpm
@@ -32,10 +31,12 @@ except ImportError:
# backwards compatibility + give the same class both ways
ts = TransactionSet
+
def headerLoad(*args, **kwds):
warnings.warn(Use rpm.hdr() instead., DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=2)
return hdr(*args, **kwds)
+
def _doHeaderListFromFD(rpm_fd, retrofit):
hlist = []
while 1:
@@ -49,17 +50,20 @@ def _doHeaderListFromFD(rpm_fd, retrofit):
return hlist
-def readHeaderListFromFD(file_desc, retrofit = True):
+
+def readHeaderListFromFD(file_desc, retrofit=True):
if not isinstance(file_desc, fd):
file_desc = fd(file_desc)
return _doHeaderListFromFD(file_desc, retrofit)
-
-def readHeaderListFromFile(path, retrofit = True):
+
+
+def readHeaderListFromFile(path, retrofit=True):
f = fd(path)
hlist = _doHeaderListFromFD(f, retrofit)
f.close()
return hlist
-
+
+
def readHeaderFromFD(file_desc):
if not isinstance(file_desc, fd):
file_desc = fd(file_desc)
@@ -72,6 +76,7 @@ def readHeaderFromFD(file_desc):
return (h, offset)
+
def signalsCaught(siglist):
caught = []
for sig in siglist:
@@ -80,5 +85,6 @@ def signalsCaught(siglist):
return caught
-def dsSingle(TagN, N, EVR = , Flags = RPMSENSE_ANY):
+
+def dsSingle(TagN, N, EVR=, Flags=RPMSENSE_ANY):
return ds((N, Flags, EVR), TagN)
diff --git a/python/rpm/transaction.py b/python/rpm/transaction.py
index db7ca67..35d7a15 100644
--- a/python/rpm/transaction.py
+++ b/python/rpm/transaction.py
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ if sys.version_info[0] == 3:
else:
_string_types = basestring,
+
# TODO: migrate relevant documentation from C-side
class TransactionSet(TransactionSetCore):
_probFilter = 0
@@ -17,7 +18,7 @@ class TransactionSet(TransactionSetCore):
oval = getattr(self, attr)
setattr(self, attr, val)
return oval
-
+
def setVSFlags(self, flags):
return self._wrapSetGet('_vsflags', flags)
@@ -138,14 +139,18 @@ class TransactionSet(TransactionSetCore):
needflags = rpm.RPMSENSE_ANY
if len(needs) == 3:
needop = needs[1]
-if needop.find('') = 0: needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_LESS
-if needop.find('=') = 0: needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_EQUAL
-if needop.find('') = 0: needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_GREATER
+if needop.find('') = 0:
+needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_LESS
+if needop.find('=') = 0:
+needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_EQUAL
+if needop.find('') = 0:
+needflags |= rpm.RPMSENSE_GREATER
needver = needs[2]
else:
needver =
-res.append(((n, v, r),(needname,needver),needflags,sense,p.key))
+res.append(((n, v, r),
+(needname, needver), needflags, sense, p.key))
return res
--
1.9.0
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Search for 7za and 7z for 7-zip.
--- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index ec85ede..7351291 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ fi dnl dnl Find some common programs dnl -AC_PATH_PROG(__7ZIP, 7zip, /usr/bin/7za, $MYPATH) +AC_PATH_PROGS(__7ZIP, [7zip 7za 7z], /usr/bin/7za, $MYPATH) AC_PATH_PROG(__BZIP2, bzip2, /usr/bin/bzip2, $MYPATH) AC_PATH_PROG(__CAT, cat, /bin/cat, $MYPATH) AC_PATH_PROG(__CHGRP, chgrp, /bin/chgrp, $MYPATH) -- 1.7.11.7 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Spelling fixes.
---
CHANGES| 20
INSTALL| 12 +-
autodeps/freebsdelf.req| 2 +-
autodeps/hpux.prov | 2 +-
autodeps/osf.req | 2 +-
lib/fsm.c | 4 ++--
lib/header.c | 4 ++--
lib/rpmdb.c| 4 ++--
lib/rpmdb.h| 4 ++--
lib/rpmfi.c| 2 +-
lib/rpmfi.h| 6 ++---
lib/rpmprob.h | 2 +-
lib/rpmts.h| 4 ++--
lib/rpmvercmp.c| 2 +-
lib/transaction.c | 4 ++--
macros.in | 2 +-
misc/fts.h | 4 ++--
python/header-py.c | 2 +-
python/rpm/transaction.py | 2 +-
python/rpmts-py.c | 2 +-
rpmio/argv.h | 6 ++---
rpmio/rpmpgp.h | 2 +-
rpmio/rpmstrpool.c | 2 +-
rpmio/rpmutil.h| 2 +-
scripts/brp-python-bytecompile | 6 ++---
scripts/perl.prov | 4 ++--
scripts/rpm_fulldb_update | 14 ++--
scripts/rpmsync| 52 +-
scripts/vpkg-provides.sh | 10
tests/rpmpython.at | 2 +-
30 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
index d6365c1..dc07f51 100644
--- a/CHANGES
+++ b/CHANGES
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@
- use rpmfiFClass() underneath --fileclass.
- use rpmfiFDepends() underneath --fileprovide and --filerequire.
- python: add fi.FColor() and fi.FClass() methods.
- - calculate dependency color and refernces.
+ - calculate dependency color and references.
- python: add ds.Color() and ds.Refs() methods.
- fix: typo in assertion.
- add rpmts/rpmte/rpmfi/rpmds element colors.
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@
- eliminate db1 support.
- enable CDB by default.
- use DBT_DB_MALLOC to eliminate re-malloc'ing header blobs.
- - rework most of rpmdb.c prepatory to implementing duplicates.
+ - rework most of rpmdb.c preparatory to implementing duplicates.
- fix: 2 memory leaks in headerSprintf.
- fix: db mire's access out-of-bounds memory.
- plug install mode leaks.
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@
- upgrade to db-3.3.4.
- fix: filter duplicate package removals (#35828).
- add armv3l arch.
- - fix: i18n strings need 1 on sucess return code (#41313).
+ - fix: i18n strings need 1 on success return code (#41313).
- fix: skip %ghost files when building packages (#38218).
- headerFree() returns NULL, _free is C++ safe.
- remove all header region assertion failures, return NULL instead.
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
- popthelp.c: don't use stpcpy to avoid portability grief (#47500).
- permit alias/exec description/arg text to be set from popt config.
- python: rhnLoad/rhnUnload to check header digest.
- - package version now configureable, default v3.
+ - package version now configurable, default v3.
- rename rpm libraries to have version with libtool -release.
- fix: -i CLI context broken Yet Again.
- unlink all __db.nnn files before 1st db open.
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@
- fix: --noscripts is another multimode option.
- add tmpdir to configure db3 tmpdir into chroot tree.
- permit lazy db opens within chroot.
- - fix: diddle dbenv path to accomodate backing store reopen in chroot.
+ - fix: diddle dbenv path to accommodate backing store reopen in chroot.
- add support for mips (#49283).
- add __as, _build_arch, and __cxx macros (#36662, #36663, #49280).
- detailed build package error messages.
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@
expand %# just like %{#} (and with same value as shell analogues).
macro defaults for *, 0, and # if no args specified.
getopt on non-linux requires optind to be saved/restored.
- - fix: don't remove file until last occurence in transaction (#4291).
+ - fix: don't remove file until last occurrence in transaction (#4291).
- resuscitate net shared paths (#4330).
- fix: macro table cannot contain NULL pointers (#4263).
- fix: last char in rpmrc w/o terminating newline lost (#4361).
@@ -1987,7 +1987,7 @@
- cpio error codes were poorly defined, causing bad error messages
- generates INSTPREFIXES tag properly, and sets RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX
and RPM_INSTALL_PREFIXn environment variables
- - fixed memory leak in install code which occured when net shared paths
+ - fixed memory leak in install code which occurred when net shared paths
were used
- don't pass net shared path to rpmInstallPackage() -- it looks
directly in the rpmrc entries
@@ -2314,7 +2314,7 @@
2.3.9 - 2.3.10:
-
[Rpm-maint] lua extension API stability
Hello, I'm considering using lua in some scriptlets, and noticed that while posix.symlink() currently exists in the posix extension included with rpm, it no longer exists in the current upstream version, there's a 3rd argument to posix.link() instead for that purpose: https://github.com/rrthomas/luaposix Are the lua APIs available to package scriptlets in rpm going to be kept backwards compatible? ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] Patch: Add support of syslog when installing/removing packages
On 03/03/2011 05:36 PM, seth vidal wrote: rpm[$pid:[$processname|$depsolvername]] pkgname pkgstate/action I wouldn't make it easy to add anything but $appname[$pid] to that part of the log entry; I suspect it could cause problems with existing software that parses the logs and expects to find it in some conventional format up until the first colon after the timestamp. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] Enforce install/erase order without adding a Requires:
On Thursday 25 November 2010, FlorianFesti wrote: Hi! There have been various issues with packages that demand a special order of installation but do not want to Require the package to be installed first. So a tag that is like Requires: during ordering but ignored otherwise is needed. Panu had a look into the problem yesterday and it turned out this can be done by simply adding a new tag triple and very few additional lines of code. But it also turned out that's really hard to come up with a good name for it. After banging our heads against the wall for the morning we settled on OrderWithRequires: It is not really beautiful but here are the reasons why we preferred it over two dozen other options: * It contains Requires which make clear that it is handled exactly like normal Requires during ordering. If it's actually not a Requires, it shouldn't IMO contain that word. If Suggests/Enhances are not desirable for this, how about DependencyOrder? Some actual, concrete example cases exactly what for and how this would be used might result in better suggestions. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] Patch: repair nosource/nopatch tag insertion
On Friday 09 April 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote: Maybe NOSOURCE/NOPATCH should not be internal at all, though. They are useful to check if a rpm is src or nosrc, there is no other way to detect this. I don't know if it's correct, but in rpmlint we decide that based on whether the source rpm has ghost files or not. If it does, we treat it as nosrc and I believe this method has worked fine. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 01/15] Generalize python configuration code to support both Python 2.* and Python 3.*
On Thursday 15 October 2009, David Malcolm wrote:
+WITH_PYTHON_INCLUDE=`${PYTHON} -c 'from distutils.sysconfig import *;
import sys; sys.stdout.write(%s\n % get_python_inc())'`
I think the last statement could be just sys.stdout.write(get_python_inc()),
no need for the newline.
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.7.0 released!
On Thursday 16 April 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote: More detailed compatibility information about the new features is available in http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.7.0#Compatibilitynotes I would add a compatibility note about *.py in s?bin dirs no longer being byte-compiled: if one used %exclude to get rid of them in rpmbuild 4.7, the package will no longer build with 4.7 because the %exclude doesn't hit anything and fails. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Improve Qt support in find-lang.sh
Hello,
The attached patch improves Qt translation support in find-lang.sh, especially
the --all-name part of it. I suppose this could be implemented in a prettier
way by someone with better sed-fu than mine, but this works for me. One test
case is Qt 4 (/usr/share/qt4/translations in Fedora 9), that's what I used
when verifying the changes.
From 2cbe531ceede4448da13788f21d40492297ed990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Ville=20Skytt=C3=A4?= ville.sky...@iki.fi
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:42:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve Qt translation support, particularly --all-name.
---
scripts/find-lang.sh |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/find-lang.sh b/scripts/find-lang.sh
index 283bcac..2dd9e0d 100755
--- a/scripts/find-lang.sh
+++ b/scripts/find-lang.sh
@@ -161,8 +161,11 @@ fi
find $TOP_DIR -type f -o -type l|sed '
s:'$TOP_DIR'::
-'$NO_ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*/'$NAME'_\([^/.]\+\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
-'$ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*[/_]\([^/_]\+\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$NO_ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*/'$NAME'_\([a-zA-Z]\{2\}\(_[a-zA-Z]\{2\}\)\?\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*/[^/_]\+_\([a-zA-Z]\{2\}_[a-zA-Z]\{2\}\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*/[^/_]\+_\([a-zA-Z]\{2\}\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$QT's:^\([^%].*/[^/]\+_\([a-zA-Z]\{2\}_[a-zA-Z]\{2\}\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$QT's:^\([^%].*/[^/]\+_\([a-zA-Z]\{2\}\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
s:^[^%].*::
s:%lang(C) ::
/^$/d' $MO_NAME
--
1.5.6.6
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] nss/nspr location for configure
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote: rpm's configure script cannot find nss/nspr even though these are installed. As it turns out, configure.ac does not use nss/nspr's pkg-config files Unless I'm mistaken, upstream nss and nspr do not ship pkgconfig files, they're distro additions and thus depending on them could be fragile. (I wonder if distro packagers haven't bothered to submit the *.pc they add upstream or if upstream has rejected them.) nor the nspr-config utility nor offers a way to pinpoint to the location. These on the other hand sound like something that should be fixed (and I see you already sent a patch). ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] New RPM seems to be much more aggressive about stripping binaries
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't know if this is the new version of RPM in Fedora Rawhide, or
just coincidence, but recently I've noticed that RPM has become even
more aggressive about stripping binaries.
Just out of interest, how? Is strip invoked bu rpmbuild on some files it was
not invoked at all earlier, or does strip itself do more these days than it
used to?
At the moment the only way I can find to disable it is:
%define __os_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress %{nil}
which is certainly taking a very big hammer to crack a small nut. Is
there an easier way?
One trick that at least used to work was to make sure binaries that one does
not want stripped are non-executable at end of %install, and then restore the
executable bits for them in %files using %attr.
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM Managment system.
On Monday 07 July 2008, Stanislav Brabec wrote: Nesreen wrote: 1- I wander that upon making a package using RPM software, can I assign version/build numbers for each file included in my package , No, you cannot. Version/release are assigned only for packages. But you can have one file per package and then assign version numbers to particular packages. Provides: can assign versions to just about anything. File versions could be implemented for example with something like Provides: file(/foo/bar) = 1.0.1 Provides: file(/bar/quux) = 2.0.0 ... can I query this version number after installation?(and I assume that my package contains set of binaries and database files).? Only packages have version/release. Provides: can be queried with --provides (and --whatprovides). ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] allow to remove Requires(pre) or not?
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Panu Matilainen wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Pixel wrote: as for me i'm not convinced that Requires(pre) not implying Requires is a feature. I would be in favor of Requires(xxx) implies Requires. Agreed, permitting remove of (pre|post|...)-only dependencies because they might not be strictly needed at runtime serves no purpose at all. It only permits creating absurd situations like having to install another package in order to be able to remove something you have installed. FWIW, I agree for Requires(preun) and Requires(postun), but not for others. What's the problem with allowing removal of stuff pulled in by Requires(pre) or Requires(post) after the corresponding %pre or %post script has already run and will never run again? ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] Problems with %Requires(preun):
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Scott Bambrough wrote: Pixel wrote: afaik rpm does not order package removal :-( Interesting. The section on context marked dependencies in the snapshot version of Maximum RPM suggests it should. [...] Is their a disconnect between the documentation and the code, Very much possible. At the time I wrote the Context marked dependencies chapter, I knew that erase ordering is not supported in rpm but had the impression that it was a known bug which would be fixed soon so I didn't feel like cluttering the docs with it. Also, I'm not a rpm developer and haven't really even looked at the code, the doc is based on personal experience as a user. (IIRC Paul Nasrat committed the doc changes for me though at the time, so it's possible it did get some kind of a review :)) or how are context marked dependencies supposed to work (if at all). Apart from the erase ordering not supported issue (which AFAICT can bite only if your dependency is being erased in the same transaction as the package requiring it), and a bug in some rpm(build?) versions where some context marked dependencies that are in specfiles using the syntax Requires(post,postun) get dropped, and that dependency loops may make things hairy, I'm not aware of any issues. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] find-lang.sh improvements
Hello,
Attached is a patch for find-lang.sh containing the following improvements:
- spelling fixes
- POSIX compliance fix for find(1) usage
- Qt translation support
- localized man page support
- match *.omf, not *omf
Split patches available at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/rpm/ if you
prefer them that way or wish to cherry pick.
diff -r 7bcadd573028 scripts/find-lang.sh
--- a/scripts/find-lang.sh Thu Oct 11 14:14:00 2007 +0300
+++ b/scripts/find-lang.sh Sat Oct 13 21:13:30 2007 +0300
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#in tact and are included with any redistribution of this file or any
#work based on this file.
-# 2004-06-20 Arkadiusz Mi¶kiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+# 2004-06-20 Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# * merge PLD changes, kde, all-name (mkochano,[EMAIL PROTECTED])
# 1999-10-19 Artur Frysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# * added support for GNOME help files
@@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ Additional options:
Additional options:
--with-gnome find GNOME help files
--with-kde find KDE help files
+ --with-qt find Qt translation files
+ --with-man find localized man pages
--all-name match all package/domain names
- --without-mo not find locales files
+ --without-mo do not find locale files
EOF
exit 1
}
@@ -54,6 +56,8 @@ shift
GNOME=#
KDE=#
+QT=#
+MAN=#
MO=
MO_NAME=$NAME.lang
ALL_NAME=#
@@ -67,6 +71,14 @@ while test $# -gt 0 ; do
;;
--with-kde )
KDE=
+ shift
+ ;;
+ --with-qt )
+ QT=
+ shift
+ ;;
+ --with-man )
+ MAN=
shift
;;
--without-mo )
@@ -85,7 +97,7 @@ while test $# -gt 0 ; do
esac
done
-find $TOP_DIR -type f -or -type l|sed '
+find $TOP_DIR -type f -o -type l|sed '
s:'$TOP_DIR'::
'$ALL_NAME$MO's:\(.*/share/locale/\)\([^/_]\+\)\(.*\.mo$\):%lang(\2) \1\2\3:
'$NO_ALL_NAME$MO's:\(.*/share/locale/\)\([^/_]\+\)\(.*/'$NAME'\.mo$\):%lang(\2) \1\2\3:
@@ -114,8 +126,8 @@ s:^\([^%].*\)::
find $TOP_DIR -type f|sed '
s:'$TOP_DIR'::
-'$NO_ALL_NAME$GNOME's:\(.*/omf/'$NAME'/'$NAME'-\([^/.]\+\).omf\):%lang(\2) \1:
-'$ALL_NAME$GNOME's:\(.*/omf/[a-zA-Z0-9.\_\-]\+/[a-zA-Z0-9.\_\-]\+-\([^/.]\+\).omf\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$NO_ALL_NAME$GNOME's:\(.*/omf/'$NAME'/'$NAME'-\([^/.]\+\)\.omf\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$GNOME's:\(.*/omf/[a-zA-Z0-9.\_\-]\+/[a-zA-Z0-9.\_\-]\+-\([^/.]\+\)\.omf\):%lang(\2) \1:
s:^[^%].*::
s:%lang(C) ::
/^$/d' $MO_NAME
@@ -130,6 +142,29 @@ s:%lang(C) ::
s:%lang(C) ::
/^$/d' $MO_NAME
+find $TOP_DIR -type f -o -type l|sed '
+s:'$TOP_DIR'::
+'$NO_ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*/'$NAME'_\([^/.]\+\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+'$ALL_NAME$QT's:\(.*[/_]\([^/_]\+\)\.qm$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+s:^[^%].*::
+s:%lang(C) ::
+/^$/d' $MO_NAME
+
+find $TOP_DIR -type d|sed '
+s:'$TOP_DIR'::
+'$ALL_NAME$MAN's:\(.*/man/\([^/_]\+\).*/man[a-z0-9]\+/\)::
+'$ALL_NAME$MAN's:\(.*/man/\([^/_]\+\).*/man[a-z0-9]\+$\):%lang(\2) \1:
+s:^\([^%].*\)::
+s:%lang(C) ::
+/^$/d' $MO_NAME
+
+find $TOP_DIR -type f -o -type l|sed '
+s:'$TOP_DIR'::
+'$NO_ALL_NAME$MAN's:\(.*/man/\([^/_]\+\).*/man[a-z0-9]\+/'$NAME'\.[a-z0-9].*\):%lang(\2) \1:
+s:^\([^%].*\)::
+s:%lang(C) ::
+/^$/d' $MO_NAME
+
if ! grep -q / $MO_NAME; then
echo No translations found for ${NAME} in ${TOP_DIR}
exit 1
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] changelog truncating
On Thursday 30 August 2007, seth vidal wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to add an option to the specfile parser or to rpmbuild that would tell it to truncate the changelogs included in the package last N entries? It would default to including them all but give us the option of clipping off the really old ones just eating up space on mirrors and in repodata. That would clip it off the actual packages too, no? Thoughts? If metadata size is the concern, truncating it in createrepo would sound better to me. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] Pruning self-dependencies?
On Monday 02 July 2007, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:50 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: As for how many dependencies this would eliminate, running some quick queries [0] against the Fedora primary sqlite metadata database told me it'd be about 7.3% of all dependencies (9246/126066). This is inaccurate (no versions in dependencies taken into account etc) but I think it should be the correct order of magnitude. Of those, how many are used as Requires: from other packages? I don't know, but... why? I'm not sure how that's related to pruning self-Requires; I can see how it could relate to reducing the number of Provides but that's a different beast, and a much tougher one. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
