On 03/23/2017 04:37 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 14:37 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Guess there's some unhandled corner left still :)
Yeah, that was because my fix was bogus :{
It didn't construct the linkpath correctly (because it was relative). It
checked with readlink
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 14:37 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Guess there's some unhandled corner left still :)
Yeah, that was because my fix was bogus :{
It didn't construct the linkpath correctly (because it was relative). It
checked with readlink (), but that doesn't fully expand the links, it
On 03/22/2017 01:34 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Commit bbfe1f86b2e4b5c0bd499d9f3dd9de9c9c20fff2 broke short-circuited
binary builds (which can be handy for testing when working on large
packages), eg:
rpmbuild -bi foo.spec; rpmbuild
Commit bbfe1f86b2e4b5c0bd499d9f3dd9de9c9c20fff2 broke short-circuited
binary builds (which can be handy for testing when working on large
packages), eg:
rpmbuild -bi foo.spec; rpmbuild -bb --short-circuit foo.spec
The problem is that in a short-circuited build all the links already
exist and
