Looks good to me as well, just a matter of @ffesti or @lkardos doing the final
review to pull it in.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Ok thanks for the review. Thanks also for confirming it wasn't intended in the
patch, it could have be a change in the policy which I also wondered.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Looks good to me, the change of behavior was certainly unintended in commit
f4a49c3.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Since commit f4a49c3d446bb180ca6b30a4337065fb6511e641 ( Unceremoniously
eliminate rpmpsmNext() ), when a preun scriptlet is failing, rpm continues to
be erased. Handling return code of runInstScript.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
