Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
I don't have a problem with this.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Yes its quite feasible to package binary *.rpm files in parallel.
The hardest problem is choosing a framework for parallelization: OMP, or
pthreads or (in RPM5) yarn.
A general framework for parallelization is needed, with queues and thread pools
and output serialization etc, is needed because
This makes no sense, /usr/bin/python is usually the linked to the binary of the
default python version in use on distros, so hardcoding the version makes no
sense.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
well, I think we should have some configure switch which interpreter to use for
all of python scripts... But this PR as it is a bit ugly..
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
So in AIX, gid 0 is simply called "system" instead of "root"?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hello, I'd like to ask your opinion on the idea of creating binary rpms in
parallel. It seems possible: I looked at packageBinaries() and it has a
straightforward for loop with no obvious dependencies between iterations. Each
iteration could be in its own thread via pthreads.
The reason I
Yes,
# id
uid=0(root) gid=0(system)
groups=0(system),2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit),11(lp)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
