sorry for breaking it =(
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/224#issuecomment-305106716___
Rpm-maint mailing list
It seems all the dependencies get collected into the first file, ie index 0. So
probably the index isn't getting incremented, perhaps because of moving to
callbacks (but didn't really look).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Commit 8f509d669b9ae79c86dd510c5a4bc5109f60d733 causes file dependencies to be
recorded on wrong files. In rpm source directory:
```
[pmatilai@sopuli rpm]$ wget
I've also just started looking into this as well.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Here's a pull request of what posted by @n3npq Jeff in #198.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/225
-- Commit Summary --
* Colorized rpmlog() output (jbj, #198)
-- File Changes --
M rpmio/rpmlog.c (148)
Best way would be to simply create a pull request from a finalized branch of
yours (without unecessary amounts of WIP commits) pushed to a forked rpm repo
of yours.
Then it would make sense to rather continue discuss the subject and also the
implementation of.
Regardless of upstream
There's no good place anywhere in rpm to document the meaning of individual
tags I'm afraid. I was about to say you should use the rpm.files/fi APIs
instead of tag values for file information but seems retrieving the digest algo
is not supported, sigh...
Anyway, much easier to merge than
Merged #223.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/223#event-1104017277___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Pushed as e96fde89c6e0ac59da5cb22fa310235a9918aa7a
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #157.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/157#event-1104183049___
Rpm-maint mailing list
I actually have this working now. The improvements for us (the Yocto project)
are quite dramatic, together with the switchover to multithreaded xz
compression the process takes several times less for many bigger packages.
I had to do these things:
1) split the binary packaging loop body into
11 matches
Mail list logo
