RRDtool on Gitter
-
For a bunch of my OSS projects, I have taken up residence on the
gitter chat system ... so if you like to talk rrdtool ... you can
find me on
https://gitter.im/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten,
RRDtool 1.5.6
=
This is a bugfix release for the 1.5 series. Please try version 1.6.0
RRDtool 1.5.6 - 2016-04-19
==
Bugfixes
* segfault on CDEF:x=
* Disable nagel algorithm as it is causing massive slowdown
* make vname nameing rules more liberal and
RRDtool 1.6.0
=
This is a new major version of RRDtool. With a bunch of new
features. The most important one being full thread-safety. This
means there is now only one version of librrd and it is thread-safe.
Features
* librrd is now fully thread-safe. librrd_th is gone
*
Hi James,
thanks ... added it in tests/Makefile.am ...
you can get the file from github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
cheers
tobi
Yesterday James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello All , Just a fyi . Hth , JimL
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 1003 1001 11913 Nov 10 16:50 modify5-testa2-create.dump
>
Hi Markus,
makeing this allocated memory sounds like a good plan ... a patch
for the master branch would be a cool thing.
cheers
tobi
Yesterday Markus Weber wrote:
> Maybe helpful for others trying to use large legends (or legends with lot of
> markup stuff):
>
> On systems with snprintf, the
Hi Stuart,
this is alrady fixed ... check github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
cheers
tobi
Today Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-04-20, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> > On 2015-04-16, Tobias Oetiker <t...@oetiker.ch> wrote:
> >> Finally! RRDtool 1.
Hi Stuart,
done
tobi
Today Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/11/23 12:02, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > this is alrady fixed ... check github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
>
> Ah - could you pull it back to the 1.5 branch please? Thanks!
>
>
--
Hi Jean-Michel,
Today Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Yesterday Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
--- rrdtool.orig/src/rrd_tool.c
+++ rrdtool/src/rrd_tool.c
@@ -598,4 +598,7 @@ int HandleInputLine(
+#ifdef __GLIBC__
+cwd = get_current_dir_name();
+#else
Hi Jean-Michel,
Yesterday Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
Hi
I'm having a look at the history of problems caused by usage of
PATH_MAX. There has been a few proposals since August 2013, but they
were based on a Debian / GNU Linux version that already contained a
patch for hurd, which was
Hi Daniel,
I guess the rrdtool.spec file could use some love ...
since php bindings are not part of the rrdtool distribution the
best thing would probably be to remove that bit entirely.
cheers
tobi
Wednesday Daniel Letai wrote:
When doing a simple
rpmbuild -ta rrdtool-1.5.3.tar.gz
I get
RRDtool 1.5.3
* The ability to draw LINE elements with dashes was gone. Now
it is back ...
* The release also is much more consistant in its handling and
documentation of commandline options
Get your copy from http://www.rrdtool.org
A big thank you to the sponsors who are helping to fund
The bugs keep coming out: RRDtool 1.5.2 is here.
Get a copy from http://www.rrdtool.org
A big thank you to the sponsors who are helping to fund my work on
rrdtool: http://www.wuerth-phoenix.com/ https://www.open.ch/
https://www.psw.net/, http://www.irisns.com/ and http://beslist.be
RRDtool
For all those who never install a x.0 version: RRDtool 1.5.1 is out.
Get a copy from http://www.rrdtool.org
A big thank you to the sponsors who are helping to fund my work on
rrdtool: http://www.wuerth-phoenix.com/ https://www.open.ch/
https://www.psw.net/, http://www.irisns.com/ and
Hi Gaby,
I guess that very few people have rrdtool setup at your scale ...
so chances for someone coming forward with useful hints may be
rather slim.
Things to look at:
a) try rrdtool 1.5rc2 since this is the latest and greates code
b) go into the cached code and add some debugging output
c)
Finally, rrdtool 1.5.0 is in the wings ...
get your copy of rc1 from
http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub/?M=D
RRDtool 1.5.0-rc1 - 2015-01-08
==
New Features
* new datasource types: DCOUNTER and DDERIVE (they work the same as
* the
original DS, except
Hi Svante,
Nice, congratulations :-)
Still no changes with respect to PATH_MAX issues?
if you have an issue, or would like to propose a patch, it is best
to open a bug https://github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x/issues
I can only see an old resolved issue with PATH_MAX in the text.
Hi Eduardo,
Today Eduardo Bragatto wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted a couple pull requests for the 1.4 branch and today I
noticed Tobias created new pull requests for the same changes to the master
branch.
Should I have created pull requests for both branches?
Just asking so in the future I
Hi Tugrul,
Today Tugrul Erdogan wrote:
Hi,
I am porting a project which is developed and used on FreeBSD 10 to Linux.
After porting rrdtool funuctionalities, I realized that periodic rrdtool
fetch calls on CentOS 7 spends two times more time than on FreeBSD. The
rrdtool version on FreeBSD
Hi Peter,
just added a few comments to your pull request
cheers
tobi
Today Peter wrote:
Hi Tobi,
I have made the pull request on github.com to branch 1.4.
I used 1.4 because master didn't contained the visual studio projects.
But in 1.4 there was no def file to export the symbols in
Hi Peter,
Today Peter wrote:
Hi Tobi,
I forked new and cloned the master
But
master/rrd_rpncalc.c:
* RRDtool 1.4.3 Copyright by Tobi Oetiker, 1997-2010
1.4/rrd_rpncalc.c:
* RRDtool 1.4.8 Copyright by Tobi Oetiker, 1997-2013
it does. the dates in the headers in the master branch are
Hi Peter,
Today Peter wrote:
Hi Tobi,
now it is not possible to compile master with Visual Studio 2013 C++.
There are incompatibilities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B ie: many
explicit casts needed, keyword template not allowed, ...
And set up the project to
Hi Peter,
the whole win32 build things are contributed ... not necessarily
consistant I am afraid ... especially getting master to build well
on win32 would be neat
lg
tobi
Today Peter wrote:
Hi Tobi,
in master/win32 there is no Visual Studio used and the dll is librrd-4.dll .
In branch
Hi Peter,
would you like to make this a pull request on github.com ?
cheers
tobi
Today Peter wrote:
Hi Tobi,
below are the patch files from the actual clone of branch 1.4.
An new error occured in rrd_restore.c
Error 3 error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'void *' to
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Childs wrote:
Reading the comments, and the edit to src/rrd_graph.c
968 +// remember that we already got this one
969 +
g_hash_table_insert(im-rrd_map,gdes_fetch_key(im-gdes[i]),GINT_TO_POINTER(i));
I have noted when I tried to build a custom
Hi Peter,
would you like to create a patch ? I bet the other windows users
would be happy!
https://www.github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
cheers
tobi
Today Peter wrote:
Hi,
I compiled successfully rrdtool-1.4.8 with Visual Studio 2013 after solving
the following 3 issues. At first pay
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 07:56 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 02:41 +0200, Steve Schnepp wrote:
Le 7 mai 2014 16:10, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch a écrit :
Today Svante Signell wrote
Hi Svante,
I merged a few debian patches the other day ... was this not your
pull request ?
cheers
tobi
Today Svante Signell wrote:
ping!
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:31 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 19:34 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
cool ... have you
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 08:14 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
I merged a few debian patches the other day ... was this not your
pull request ?
Thanks to the Debian patches now upstream. The other question is about
how to properly test the PATH_MAX
Hi Svante
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 08:36 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Today Svante Signell wrote:
I did run tests/alltest and tests/tune1,tune2. All tests were OK.
Anything else to try to find out if the patches are OK? Anything I
can
apply
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 02:41 +0200, Steve Schnepp wrote:
Le 7 mai 2014 16:10, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch a écrit :
Today Svante Signell wrote:
Well, the PATH_MAX patches affect all architectures, but without
them
rrdtool FTBFS for Hurd
Hi Steve,
I like the patch ... would you make it into a pull request on
github (vs the master branch) and include the appropriate
documentation changes ...
cheers
tobi
Today Steve Shipway wrote:
So, I have a patch (unified context diff) to add the RPN operators ROLL,
INDEX, COPY and DEPTH.
Hi Svante,
cool ... have you seen that there is now the beginning of a
test-suite in the HEAD branch of on github ?
cheers
tobi
Today Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
Here are updated patches for rrdtool/rrd_client.c and
rrdtool/rrd_daemon.c. We had some discussions in August last year. I
Hi Steve,
your function always affects 3 values ... would there be any gain
in makeing this call more generic ?
a,b,c,d,x,y,ROL rotate the last x values on the stack by y steps to
the left. and maybe have -y role to the right?
cheers
tobi
Today Steve Shipway wrote:
So, splitting this idea
variantes make peoples lives easier, I
have no problem with adding them as well
cheers
tobi
Steve
Steve Shipway
University of Auckland ITS
UNIX Systems Design Lead
s.ship...@auckland.ac.nz
Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487
From: Tobias Oetiker [t
Hi Steve,
in the (contributed) code there is:
// handle negative shifts special
if (shifts0) {
stptr--;
} else {
stptr-=shifts;
}
and later
if (shifts0) {
Hi All,
I have spent considerable time improving the graph performance in
the latest 1.4.x editions ...
one major cause of slowdown was 'font selection'. Depending on the
number of fonts on your system this can take a long time ... if
you generate multiple graphs with a single instance of
Hi Peter,
Yesterday Peter Stamfest wrote:
Dear List!
I have just pushed a new version of my rrd modify work to
https://github.com/stamfest/rrdtool-1.x in branch rrdmodify-master.
This is the first public version to have support for a reduction of
the basic RRD step size. Note that there
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Am 2014-03-08 11:34, schrieb Peter Stamfest:
Dear List!
I have just pushed a new version of my rrd modify work to
https://github.com/stamfest/rrdtool-1.x in branch rrdmodify-master.
Which brings me to a very important point I am pondering over for
Hi Peter,
Yesterday Peter Stamfest wrote:
Am 2014-02-27 22:50, schrieb Peter Stamfest:
Am 2014-02-27 12:38, schrieb Peter Stamfest:
Am 2014-02-26 15:24, schrieb Tobias Oetiker:
Hi Peter,
thanks ... its merged ...
Which leaves me to ask for feedback to the command syntax I invented
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hello!
The rrdtool(1) manpage has the following to say about consolidation
functions:
When setting up an Round Robin Database (RRD), you can define at
which interval this consolidation should occur, and what
consolidation function (CF)
Hi Peter,
thanks ... its merged ...
can you rebase the pipe patch too ?
cheers
tobi
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Am 2014-02-25 09:24, schrieb Tobias Oetiker:
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hi List, Hi Tobi,
I have implemented a rrd modify command. Essentially, it takes
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hi List, Hi Tobi,
I have implemented a rrd modify command. Essentially, it takes an
input RRD, adds or removes data sources and creates an output RRD.
My current imlementation can be found in branch rrdmodify at
using the
pull parser in rrdtool restore
cheers
Tobias Oetiker
t...@oetiker.ch mailto:t...@oetiker.ch
062 775 9902
On 16.02.2014, at 03:21, Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com
mailto:ssinya...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think it does. Why isn't a usual file good enough? You
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Am 2014-02-25 09:24, schrieb Tobias Oetiker:
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hi List, Hi Tobi,
I have implemented a rrd modify command. Essentially, it takes an
input RRD, adds or removes data sources and creates an output RRD.
My current
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 14:22 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
OK, I will continue next with rrd_client.c. Is that one built into the
library librrd*.so* ?
yes, but it can also be used standalone
How?
in the sense that it has little
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 18:33 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
I can only tell you when I see the patch ...
if I am reading your code corectly, you are causing a memory leak
by makeing get_path return an allocated string instead of a
constant
Hi Svante,
Yesterday Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
Attached is an updated Debian patch for 1.4.7-2, from 2009, to avoid
PATH_MAX problems for GNU/Hurd in rrd_graph.{c,h} and rrd_tool.c. This
patch is conditioned on if MAXPATH (and __GLIBC__) is defined or not.
I would suggest to avoid
Hi Svante,
is there any authorship information for this patch ?
or are you submitting it under your own name ?
cheers
tobi
Wednesday Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
Attached is an updated debian patch from 1.4.7-2 to avoid the error when
compiling bindings/ruby/main.c since the
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:08 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
Yesterday Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
Attached is an updated Debian patch for 1.4.7-2, from 2009, to avoid
PATH_MAX problems for GNU/Hurd in rrd_graph.{c,h
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:15 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 09:08 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
So you wan one megapatch for PATH_MAX/MAXPATH issues? Isn't it better
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 20:41 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
..
1.4.3 was the version when the code was forked for 1.5 dev ... in
the snapshots it gets updated by a script prior to snapshotting ...
I was confused by the release version
Hi Svante,
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:02 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
the source is on
https://github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
fork it, apply your patches, push and then create a pull request
Hi,
I have now cloned the master branch at github
Hi Svante,
the source is on
https://github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-1.x
fork it, apply your patches, push and then create a pull request
cheers
tobi
Today Svante Signell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:46 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Svante,
cool ... ports help to make code better most
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Childs wrote:
Gday folks.
I have been doing some testing of some options only in /trunk (not 1.4.8) and
have noticed that some of the applications I am testing that use 'rrdtool
graph' are doing things like?
AREA:inbits0#B6D14B:'eth0 In ':
and
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Childs wrote:
Hello Tobi
On 5/08/13 6:57 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Peter,
Today Peter Childs wrote:
Gday folks.
I have been doing some testing of some options only in /trunk (not
1.4.8) and have noticed that some of the applications I
Readers,
I am proud to announce another stability release for the
rrdtool 1.4 branch the main new feature of this release is that
large graph expressions are processed magnitudes faster. RRDgraph
is now using map lookups instead of linear searches for finding
*DEF variables. More information on
Hi Mohan,
Yesterday mudradimohan wrote:
My name is Mohan and this is my first entry to this forum. As of now I am
familiar with creating a chart using rrdtool. I just wanted to know whether
there is any option in rrdtool to draw a drill down chart, i.e., if I select
some region between 2
Hi Nirmoy,
Today nirmoy wrote:
Hey friends,
I have added cassandra support to rrd like lidbi. Is there anyone interested
?Please suggest me to add some more features. i just added basic cassandra
data model support one columnfamily one row support , so this modification
can support
Hi Olivier,
Today Olivier Doucet wrote:
Hello,
Just a follow up on this :
Problem is definitely in libdbi and the implementation of
dbi_result_next_row(). This function is using mysql_data_seek() all
the time to move from one row to another, which is very unefficient
for mySQL. PostgreSQL
Hi Gabor,
Friday Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I've just installed rrdcached and I'm checking its performance.
I found that daemon does not sanitize file paths.
Two different cliens may want to refer the same unix file
with different names but rrdcached does not recognizes this
but uses given
Today Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
realpath() expands all symbolic links and resolves references to
/./,
This is going to cause a LOT of stat() calls: O(commands * average dir
depth)
I see your point, but it's probably better to do trivial string
manipulations that don't
RRDjig, the tool for transfering data from one rrd file to another
allowing for different stepping and structure between the two is
now on github ...
https://github.com/oetiker/rrdtool-rrdjig
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
Hi Thomas,
Sep 5 Thomas Mainka wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently I have experimented with dynamic graphing of RRDtool data on web
pages (as JSON data queried by jQuery). While the JSON export and transport
worked fine, after some testing I realized that starting with version 1.4
jQuery rejects
Hi Stan,
Yesterday Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
how is it supposed to handle large RRD files over the network?
If, say, the client and server are on different hosts, and you're
updating RRD data in a BLOB. and RRD data can easily be several
megabytes. So, how is the data transfer supposed to be
Today Dustin Fisch wrote:
Not sure how you are going to handle multiple datasources in a single
RRD in your trigger, but I'm sure you have an idea.
Anthony Johnson ans...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure how you are going to handle multiple datasources in a single
RRD in your trigger, but I'm
RRDtool repository moved from Subversion to Git
---
Over the last few weeks I have been experimenting with
moving rrdtool over to github. Finally it is done. The
rrdtool source repository along with the trac issue
database reside on github now.
Hi Dustin,
Yesterday Dustin Fisch wrote:
Hi,
I am currently thinking about building an RRD extension for PostgreSQL.
The extension will provide a RRD data type which represents a
complete database and functions for all the existing functions of the
RRD tool, like create, update, first and
Hi Stuart,
Today Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-08-12, Martin Pelikan martin.peli...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the destination system is OpenBSD; I managed to compile the
latest SVN version, because the one in packages is 1.2.30
just for the record, the package is intentionally held back
Hi Steve,
Today Steve Shipway wrote:
Unable to find a script to merge my RRD files as I wanted, I've taken to
writing my own generic one.
way to go !
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://it.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902
Hi Martin,
Today Martin Pelikan wrote:
Hi!
So far the cooperation has been perfect, so I'm gonna dig deeper :-)
OpenBSD has a modified toolchain that (among other cool features) warns
you about certain programming constructs that have been found unsafe,
like the use of
Hi Sven,
Friday Sven-Göran Bergh wrote:
Dear List,
we have the need to incorporate generation/updates of RRD files in
an embedded environment. However, there are a few dependencies that
ruin our plan, most notably libxml2 and libglib. Even a minimal
build (--disable-*) still has these
Hi Martin,
I was just trying to make rrdtool 1.4.7 from Gentoo to make throughput graphs
in bps on the left axis and in Bps on the right one, when it suddenly crashed:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xb710c3dd in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0
Today Martin Pelikan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 04:39:51PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
thanks for investigating this ... the intended behaviour is not to
autoscale in that way though ... there was already an incomplete
fix for this probem in r2123 ... I have now put in the rest
Hi Martin,
Today Martin Pelikan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:50:52PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
as long as you do not specify a format for the right axis labels,
they should autoscale ...
Sorry, but as you can see here: http://lk.storkhole.cz/vole.png
myself and this version
Hi Rick,
Today Rick Jones wrote:
On 06/26/2012 06:46 AM, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Michael,
I am not aware of such an extension, but changes might actually not
be all that difficult ...
I guess turning the step parameter from seconds into milli seconds
would be all that is required
Hi Tomasz,
that does look nice
cheers
tobi
Today Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hello,
I reworked the implementation based on iodine's socket activation patch.
It is much simpler - no additional files to ship, no autoconf stuff. Gathering
passed file descriptor is now unconditional and do not
Hi Gilles,
Saturday g@free.fr wrote:
while compiling rrdtool-1.4.7 under linux with gcc-4.4.5, I spotted those
warnings
In file included from rrd_i18n.h:18,
from rrd_tool.c:21:
gettext.h:176:6: warning: __STRICT_ANSI__ is not defined
gettext.h:200:5: warning:
Hi Anthony,
that code never made it to 'prime time' ... I have removed it ...
but check out the previous post by martin sperl, we are
investigating way of makeing rrdtool graph much more versatile ...
in order todo that, its whole structural underpinning is curently
under review.
cheers
tobi
David,
Today David Chappelle wrote:
Just pinging again since I haven't heard any response.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Chappelle chapp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am considering using rrdtool in an embedded c++ environment.
However, I do not want the baggage of all of the
Hi Richard,
Today Richard Laager wrote:
The posix_fallocate() version is definitely cleaner. Again, this patch
is only lightly tested.
Also, I happened to notice a tiny bit of duplicated code, so I've
attached a separate patch for that. It seems so obviously duplicated
that I've looked at
Today Richard Laager wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 07:22 +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
* with the patch, we get performance and a sort of thin provisioning (files
with holes).
fallocate() does not create holes. From fallocate(2), After a
successful call, subsequent writes into this range
Folks,
On the heals of the 1.4.6 release, I have just published 1.4.7 it
contains some more cleanups and the proper version number for
librrd. So make sure to use 1.4.7 and NOT 1.4.6.
Get your copy from:
http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool
1.4.7 is the second release produced with the support of
Hi James,
thanks for your patch, added in r2251
cheers
tobi
Dec 27 James Brown wrote:
There's a bug in the current HEAD of rrdtool (and I suppose going back to
mid-2007, from the svn blame output) which causes it to segfault if you
point it at an rrdcached socket which isn't writable. I've
Folks,
Finally I got that rrdtool update out of the door. 1.4.6 comes with
a ton of bugfixes. From potential segfaults to cornercases in the
chart generation as well as a few new features.
Get your copy from:
http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool
1.4.6 is the first release produced with the support
Hi All,
I have added xport json output in r2250 for both trunk and 1.4.x into
rrdtool ...
cheers
tobi
Friday Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Michael,
Today Michael Markstaller wrote:
Hi,
thanks for looking at it, maybe I was too nervous on my first post ;)
Now its attached.. (I use
Hi James,
Yesterday James Brown wrote:
Ping?
got it ... just not got around to investigate yet ...
cheers
tobi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:40 PM, James Brown jbr...@yelp.com wrote:
There's a bug in the current HEAD of rrdtool (and I suppose going back to
mid-2007, from the svn blame
Hi Michael,
Today Michael Markstaller wrote:
Hi,
thanks for looking at it, maybe I was too nervous on my first post ;)
Now its attached.. (I use this with quilt in the debian-lenny package)
Simply copied the fetch-function with some brackets..
the idea for implementing this, is to make
Hi Michael,
I guess adding json will help many people, so I will add it ...
(got another patch already from a few months back, but if you can
send me yours, I will be glad to take it for inspiration too :-)
(it was not attached)
cheers
tobi
Yesterday Michael Markstaller wrote:
Hi,
my first
Hi Alex,
Yesterday Alex Bennee wrote:
On 19 December 2011 17:00, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Alex,
your system seems to be using a different version of libtool ...
so did you run MakeMakefile ?
No, isn't that part of the configure/autogen stuff?
MakeMakefile calls the auto
Hi Alex,
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 20 December 2011 15:46, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Alex,
Yesterday Alex Bennee wrote:
On 19 December 2011 17:00, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Alex,
your system seems to be using a different version of libtool
Hi Alex,
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 16 December 2011 16:35, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Alex,
see r2241,r2242 I have modified the configure script to use standard
techniques to deal with libwrap, ev this helps ...
I'm afraid not in my case. But it's not the autoconf
Hi Alex,
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
Config is DONE!
With MMAP IO: yes
Build rrd_getopt: no
Build rrd_graph: yes
Static programs: no
Perl Modules: perl_piped perl_shared
Perl Binary: /usr/bin/perl
Perl Version: 5.12.4
Alex,
your system seems to be using a different version of libtool ...
so did you run MakeMakefile ?
cheers
tobi
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 19 December 2011 16:19, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Alex,
snip
so the libraries look good ... I don't see at the moment how -lwrap
Hi Alex,
ah ... I found something ... try changeing
include tcpd.h
into
include tcpd.h
in the configure script
and run it again.
cheers
tobi
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 12 December 2011 16:52, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Alex,
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 8
Hi Alex,
see r2241,r2242 I have modified the configure script to use standard
techniques to deal with libwrap, ev this helps ...
cheers
tobi
Today Alex Bennee wrote:
On 16 December 2011 13:26, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Alex,
ah ... I found something ... try changeing
Hi Steve,
I think this condition should now be detected corectly ... will
release 1.4.6 RSN
cheers
tobi
Feb 3 Steve Shipway wrote:
Tobi responded thusly
Steve Shipway wrote
Seems to be a bit of a bug if you set RRDCACHED_ADDRESS=.
Surely this should mean 'don't use rrdcached' but
in a customer project the 'localtime' question has come up
regarding graphs and consolidation.
rrdtool internally works in GMT, so a day in rrdtool is always GMT
aligned. If you define RRAs for 1 day intervals, this is what you
will get. With the world growing smaller, I still think this is a
Hi Alex,
Today Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
DEF:weekly=test.rrd:ifHCInOctets:AVERAGE:step=3600:ctrigger=%V:tz=CET
(%V would be the ISO week number, but you could use any expression you
want).
Whenever the value of the ctrigger changes, one 'grouping' comes to
an end. If the
Hi Francisco,
Yesterday Francisco Perea wrote:
Hi, Tobi
Ok. It's javascript and I'm testing it, but It's a bad idea this kind of
upgrade for RRDTool?
I'm wondering if worth it to try 'rrdgrahp2' in orginal code but graphs
direct in browser using D3 or any graph library...
What do you think
Hi Francisco,
Yesterday Francisco Perea wrote:
[...]
PD: Tobi suggested me to use D3 (http://mbostock.github.com/d3/). I've been
reading about it, and seems to be a very powerful graphics library written
in Java and also very light
note, its javascript ... so it runs in the browser ...
1 - 100 of 795 matches
Mail list logo
