I have just installed cucumber in a rails application following the
instructions in the wiki
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/ruby-on-rails
How I have to specify the configuration option for using cucumber in
spanish language?
Is there a file cucumber.opts in some folder?
or have I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Juanma Cervera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed cucumber in a rails application following the
instructions in the wiki
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/ruby-on-rails
How I have to specify the configuration option for using cucumber
Going back to the debate about keeping state between steps, I found
myself with the mild urge to be able to write this today:
Given there is a user
And the user has 20 friends
Then I should see a thumbnail of each of the users's friends
Which should be a link to the user profile page for that
On 25 Sep 2008, at 17:48, Mark Wilden wrote:
Each controller action only calls one model method other than an
initial find or new..
I didn't get that article (or, rather, that particular subarticle)
at all.
I kinda tuned out when I read, Polymorphic associations, however, are
On 26 Sep 2008, at 12:31, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 25 Sep 2008, at 17:48, Mark Wilden wrote:
Each controller action only calls one model method other than an
initial find or new..
I didn't get that article[1] (or, rather, that particular
subarticle) at all.
I kinda tuned out when I read,
El 26/9/2008, a las 13:30, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:50 pm, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
The following trick, calling pending from inside the before block,
effectively does what I want. But I'm wondering if I can count on
this behaviour going forward? What do
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following trick, calling pending from inside the before block,
effectively does what I want. But I'm wondering if I can count on this
behaviour going forward? What do you think?
Pending is not going anywhere.
Stories without shared state feel clunky to me, because we would never speak
that way.
I also had a similar urge, don't know if it's a programmer urge:
Given a user
With the name 'josh'
And the password 'sesame'
...so I don't end up with an explosion of steps for 'a user with x', 'a user
with
On 26 Sep 2008, at 13:33, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Going back to the debate about keeping state between steps, I
found myself
with the mild urge to be able to write this today:
Given there is a user
And the user has 20
On Sep 25, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
Hi folks,
Wondering what the best (that is, neatest and most supported) way to
conditionally turn off some specs depending on the runtime platform.
Background: some of my specs call out to some third-party tools that
may or may not be
On 26 Sep 2008, at 13:59, Josh Chisholm wrote:
Stories without shared state feel clunky to me, because we would
never speak that way.
I also had a similar urge, don't know if it's a programmer urge:
Given a user
With the name 'josh'
And the password 'sesame'
...so I don't end up with an
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the promises of using treetop is the ability to extend the
grammar yourself to include keywords like Which.
Wow. OK I need to check that out.
I don't know how directly this is supported at this point - when I
said
El 26/9/2008, a las 14:59, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following trick, calling pending from inside the before block,
effectively does what I want. But I'm wondering if I can count on
this
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El 26/9/2008, a las 14:59, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following trick, calling pending from inside the before block,
Thanks Aslak.
when I executed ruby script/generate cucumber, after installing the
plugins, these are the folders and files that were created:
features/steps
features/steps/env.rb
features/steps/common_webrat.rb
lib/tasks
lib/tasks/cucumber.rake
script/cucumber.rake
I think script/cucumber.rake
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Juanma Cervera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Aslak.
when I executed ruby script/generate cucumber, after installing the
plugins, these are the folders and files that were created:
features/steps
features/steps/env.rb
features/steps/common_webrat.rb
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also why is the article so down on STI? What are the drawbacks? What do
people use instead?
I think the guy is really just down on inheritance itself, which is not an
unusual nor even entirely unjustified attitude. Ruby has
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is a better rule each controller action should contain no more than two
branches? (But then, I try to apply that to all methods, and even then, I
try to push conditional code as far down as possible.)
On an OOP mailing
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's actually a case of having a bunch of Java junk installed on my
local system which I can use to do extended testing of things like feed
validity on this machine, while on the server I don't have (and can't
El 26/9/2008, a las 16:16, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
El 26/9/2008, a las 14:59, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 26, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 26/9/2008, a las 16:16, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
El 26/9/2008, a las 14:59, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Thu, Sep 25,
On Sep 26, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
FWIW, I think it's rather nice. We went through a fad of using @it
for a while, and now we have a stuff[] hash. Both similar ideas -
there must be something in this.
I'm doing the same thing. I had @current_project, @current_page etc
(
On 26 Sep 2008, at 12:49, Matt Wynne wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on why you don't like these? I'm pretty
new to rails (but not programming generally) and rather naive about
such things!
It's quite hard to explain briefly, but basically it makes the
predicate (interpretation of the
On 26 Sep 2008, at 15:16, Mark Wilden wrote:
Also why is the article so down on STI? What are the drawbacks? What
do people use instead?
One downside to STI is it forces you to leave NULL columns for
attributes that don't exist in all models. This is also really bad
for integrity. I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Juanma Cervera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Aslak.
when I executed ruby script/generate cucumber, after installing the
plugins, these are the folders and files that were created:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One downside to STI is it forces you to leave NULL columns for attributes
that don't exist in all models. This is also really bad for integrity.
I think all of your comments make sense, but I did just want to call out
hey all,
I've started playing around with object daddy and have a question? How
do I ensure that anything created during a spec example gets rolled
back before the next one?
Without that ability, it starts messing with models that have unique
columns on successive runs of my specs.
Oh,
On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Tim Glen wrote:
hey all,
I've started playing around with object daddy and have a question?
How do I ensure that anything created during a spec example gets
rolled back before the next one?
Without that ability, it starts messing with models that have
On 26 Sep 2008, at 17:28, Mark Wilden wrote:
I think all of your comments make sense, but I did just want to call
out that the Rails way is not typically concerned with this sort
of integrity at the database level. It's handled in the model.
Ah ok, I wasn't sure if your comment was
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(be sure to spec what attributes your classes have if you're scared of
pollution!)
As part of the TDD process, I spec all attributes, but this doesn't seem
universal. Is this a misconception? Do people actually make sure
On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(be sure to spec what attributes your classes have if you're scared
of pollution!)
As part of the TDD process, I spec all attributes, but this doesn't
seem universal.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Scott Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually end up doing something like this:
columns = [:email, :message]
columns.each do |column|
it should have a reader and writer for the column #{column} do
@invite.should respond_to(column)
I was experiencing the weirdest behavior (rake spec running fine
without a test database) the other day. Turned out that actually rake
spec was (and has been for heavens know how long for me) running in
development environment. However script/spec runs in test
environment just as I expect it to
Oh, and I do have this line in my spec_helper:
config.use_transactional_fixtures = true
I assume that only does anything to fixtures, specifically
No. That tells rspec/ test::unit to start a transaction at the
start of every test case, and issue a rollback when it's over.
That + a
Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Matt Wynne span dir=ltrmailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/span wrote:
Also why is the article so down on STI? What are the drawbacks? What
do people use instead?I think the guy is really just down on
inheritance itself, which is
Thanks for the clarrification of your intent for the comment. After
reading the linked threads I have the following questions/comments:
1) All the responses to sharing story content get use ruby as the
response.
2( I understand you appear to find this adequate. I do not.
3) Should I open
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Task class and an
Appointment subclass. An Appointment (in this context) is simply a
Task that can only be performed on one day. Otherwise it#39;s exactly
like a Task (again, in
On Sep 26, 2008, at 6:18 pm, Mark Wilden wrote:
As part of the TDD process, I spec all attributes, but this doesn't
seem universal. Is this a misconception? Do people actually make
sure that all columns exist and can be written to and read from?
What I meant by this was that say you have
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(be sure to spec what attributes your classes have if you're scared of
pollution!)
As part of the TDD process, I spec all attributes, but this
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:10 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Now sometimes there will be some up-front modeling discussions and you
may have a sense that a model needs a specific set of fields just
because that's what the customer says. In those cases, I'd recommend
trying to
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Michael Latta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the clarrification of your intent for the comment. After reading
the linked threads I have the following questions/comments:
1) All the responses to sharing story content get use ruby as the
response.
2( I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:10 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now sometimes there will be some up-front modeling discussions and you
may have a sense that a model needs a specific set of fields just
because
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Tero Tilus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was experiencing the weirdest behavior (rake spec running fine
without a test database) the other day. Turned out that actually rake
spec was (and has been for heavens know how long for me) running in
development
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
DataMapper, for example, offers auto-migrations. You just add a
property to your model file and it takes care of the migration for
you.
The relationship between schema and models in Rails is weird. The basic
source of
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Scott Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Tim Glen wrote:
Oh, and I do have this line in my spec_helper:
config.use_transactional_fixtures = true
I assume that
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
DataMapper, for example, offers auto-migrations. You just add a
property to your model file and it takes care of the migration for
you.
The
Using a macros directory rather than explicit dependencies (as is
now true for steps) is fine. Unless you have a ton of macros it
should not be too bad performance wise. And, it prevents duplicate
steps from being used in different parts of a large spec unknowingly.
The most likely use
On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Tero Tilus wrote:
I was experiencing the weirdest behavior (rake spec running fine
without a test database) the other day. Turned out that actually rake
spec was (and has been for heavens know how long for me) running in
development environment. However
Ticket created
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/20-ability-to-write-steps-in-scenario-language
Michael
On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:20 PM, Michael Latta wrote:
Using a macros directory rather than explicit dependencies (as is
now true for steps) is fine. Unless you
49 matches
Mail list logo
