This patch is incomplete and should not be used. I think that my patch,
submitted Sept 9th and resubmitted Oct 10th has the complete set of changes
to Makefile.in to add CPPFLAGS (plus a few more cleanups).
Thanks.
PG
--
Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant, Stratus Technologies.
Voice: +1
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:30:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why it tries to get 100% CPU even though there's nothing to do ?
What do you mean nothing to do? Rsync is creating the new version of
a changed file which is done both by
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:02:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:30:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why it tries to get 100% CPU even though there's nothing to do ?
What do you mean nothing to do? Rsync is
Hi all
I hope no one minds but I was asked to post my timetrial findings back
to the list.
Hope it helps someone else as well, if you have any suggestions please
mention them as I need all the speed that I can get
The scenaro is as follows
I have to switch mail servers and I need to copy all
Mp3sa yine bir ilki gerçekleþtiriyor: Klip arþivi!
Full albüm ve single parçalar mp3 halinde!
Arayýpta bulamadýðýnýz bütün parçalar için birde sitemize bakýn: http://www.mp3sa.com
Full Turkçe Album
Full Yabancý Album
A-Z Yerli Mp3
A-Z Yabancý Mp3
En Iyý 20
Yerli Výdeo Klýp
Yabancý
Hello,
I am trying to use rsync (version 2.5.5) in a server client
model to distribute software files. When I kick off the
rsync client on an AIX 4.3.3 pwr3 platform (machine grp4c),
I get the following error message. We are in a real bind to
get this protocol going; any help/insight/suggestions
I agree, rsh as root is bad. I wouldn't suggest that. I'm talking about
running rsync --daemon, using /etc/rsyncd.conf to control the form of
the access. It's pretty good for reading, and mostly works for writing.
Oh, on our security - no ssh, but rsh is ok for root. I'm also
exaggerating a
Randy: I suspect it's running chrooted, and can't see the necessary items
to resolve names. Fastest is to turn off chroot. You may be able to get
by with just turning off hosts allow and/or hosts deny. It seems that
maybe an /etc in the root of the module will take care of it, or so i
I'm getting unexpected EOF in read_timeout when dealing with large
collections of files.
The root path is /files, which has 1.4GB of data in 483260 files in 5328
subdirectories.
I tried setting --timeout=600 as a test, but it is still timing out after
about 30 seconds. Shouldn't this do it?
Today, Mozzi wrote:
All tests were done from the same two machines in the same direction,I
just changed the options
It was done on two Gigabit nic's with a crosover cable so network usage
and speed were effectively
not a factor.
This is not true ! A Gigabit card itself never uses jumbo
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:27:46PM +0200, Mozzi wrote:
Hi all
I hope no one minds but I was asked to post my timetrial findings back
to the list.
Hope it helps someone else as well, if you have any suggestions please
mention them as I need all the speed that I can get
The scenaro is as
Hi all
I am trying to use rsync to sync just local, but the delete command --delete
is not working ?
this is my command line
/usr/local/bin/rsync -uvr --stats /sync/files /*
/sync/remote/syd-103/Inetpub/wwwroot/files/
the directory is a mounted directory of our IIS servers, any ideas on what
ÅóÓÑÄãºÃ£¡
¶à²ã´ÎÍøÂçÓªÏúÒѾ³ÉΪµ±½ñÈ«Çò¼«ÆäÖØÒªµÄÐÐÏúÊÖ¶ÎÖ®Ò»¡£¾¹ýÃÀ¹ú
¹þ·ð´óѧÉÌѧԺ£¬Ë¹Ì¹¸£´óѧºÍŦԼ»ª¶û½Ö±¨µÄÑо¿£¬Ô¤¼ÆÔÚδÀ´¼¸Ä꣬ȫ
ÊÀ½ç50%ÖÁ65%µÄ»õÆ·½«»áÒÔ¶à²ã´ÎµÄµçÄÔÓªÏúÐÎʽÀ´½»Òס£
ÔÚÃÀ¹úµÄ50Íò¸ö°ÙÍò¸»ÎÌÖУ¬ÓÐ20%ÊÇÔÚ¹ýÈ¥µÄ¼¸Äêͨ¹ýMLM¶ø³É¹¦µÄ¡£
ÅóÓÑÄãºÃ£¡
¶à²ã´ÎÍøÂçÓªÏúÒѾ³ÉΪµ±½ñÈ«Çò¼«ÆäÖØÒªµÄÐÐÏúÊÖ¶ÎÖ®Ò»¡£¾¹ýÃÀ¹ú
¹þ·ð´óѧÉÌѧԺ£¬Ë¹Ì¹¸£´óѧºÍŦԼ»ª¶û½Ö±¨µÄÑо¿£¬Ô¤¼ÆÔÚδÀ´¼¸Ä꣬ȫ
ÊÀ½ç50%ÖÁ65%µÄ»õÆ·½«»áÒÔ¶à²ã´ÎµÄµçÄÔÓªÏúÐÎʽÀ´½»Òס£
ÔÚÃÀ¹úµÄ50Íò¸ö°ÙÍò¸»ÎÌÖУ¬ÓÐ20%ÊÇÔÚ¹ýÈ¥µÄ¼¸Äêͨ¹ýMLM¶ø³É¹¦µÄ¡£
ÅóÓÑÄãºÃ£¡
¶à²ã´ÎÍøÂçÓªÏúÒѾ³ÉΪµ±½ñÈ«Çò¼«ÆäÖØÒªµÄÐÐÏúÊÖ¶ÎÖ®Ò»¡£¾¹ýÃÀ¹ú
¹þ·ð´óѧÉÌѧԺ£¬Ë¹Ì¹¸£´óѧºÍŦԼ»ª¶û½Ö±¨µÄÑо¿£¬Ô¤¼ÆÔÚδÀ´¼¸Ä꣬ȫ
ÊÀ½ç50%ÖÁ65%µÄ»õÆ·½«»áÒÔ¶à²ã´ÎµÄµçÄÔÓªÏúÐÎʽÀ´½»Òס£
ÔÚÃÀ¹úµÄ50Íò¸ö°ÙÍò¸»ÎÌÖУ¬ÓÐ20%ÊÇÔÚ¹ýÈ¥µÄ¼¸Äêͨ¹ýMLM¶ø³É¹¦µÄ¡£
Howdy...
I do not know what is going on, but either I am getting a large amount of
SPAM that is being submitted to the list, or I am getting a lot of spam that
is sent under disguise as coming from the list, i.e. forged headers.
Am I the only one, or is this something the admin needs to fix in
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:07:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy...
I do not know what is going on, but either I am getting a large amount of
SPAM that is being submitted to the list, or I am getting a lot of spam that
is sent under disguise as coming from the list, i.e. forged
17 matches
Mail list logo
