The packaging/lsb/rsync.spec file is broken as shipped: It has a Sept
month (rpmbuild here takes only 3-letter month names), and RH gzips the
manpages, so the %files list can't find them. I also added doc/README-SGML
and doc/rsync.sgml to the %doc files. Patch follows.
Thanks for all the good
Hi,
This is a newbie type'o'question so I'm most probably talking about
something I know nothing about ;)
Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
checksums for the archived files, and later compare existing files against
the saved checksums without plugging in the
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
when trying to use rsync there's an error message:
10.80.12.6: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(151)
there are 2 servers, both have RedHat 7.3
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:30:50PM +0200, Niko Nyman wrote:
Hi,
This is a newbie type'o'question so I'm most probably talking about
something I know nothing about ;)
Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
checksums for the archived files, and later compare
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:37:34PM +0500, Eduard A. Ivanov wrote:
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
when trying to use rsync there's an error message:
10.80.12.6: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream
has someone come up with a trick to let disconnected ssh connections be
recovered without terminating and having to restart rsync (perhaps by
wrapping ssh or something)?
i have a very large (but pretty stable/unchanging) tree of files that i
need to sync daily, at night, between two
FYI.
Yeah
actually I found my mistake.
In
the config file I had path=/blah/blah/
The
real thing is path=/blah/blah/*
It
worked.
Thanks.
-Message
d'origine-
De:
Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé: 27 janvier,
2003 17:44
À:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Green, Paul;
on 28.1.2003 15:06, jw schultz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
checksums for the archived files, and later compare existing files against
the saved checksums without plugging in the removable drive? I imagine in
theory this
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:41:20AM -0700, David Garamond wrote:
has someone come up with a trick to let disconnected ssh connections be
recovered without terminating and having to restart rsync (perhaps by
wrapping ssh or something)?
i have a very large (but pretty stable/unchanging) tree
Well I have no permission problems... I'm running my commands as root.
With path = /a/b/ it didn't work but it worked with path = /a/b/*
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De
la part de jw schultz
Envoyé : 28 janvier, 2003 09:39
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:57:17AM -0500, Patrick Amirian wrote:
Well I have no permission problems... I'm running my commands as root.
With path = /a/b/ it didn't work but it worked with path = /a/b/*
link_stat . : Permission denied
means you do have a permissions problem.
Unless you
Bu mesajýn içeriðini düzgün bir þekilde göremiyorsanýz, www.e-talep.com/tanitim adresini ziyaret edebilirsiniz.Neden ? E-ticaretNeden ? E-talep.comTicaretin %35'i internete taþýnacak, sizde yerinizi alýn !!!2005 yýlýna kadar firmalar arasý ticaretin %35'inin elektronik ortama taþýnacaðý tahmin
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:26:32PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Dave Dykstra wrote:
I give up. The msleep(100) consistently causes hangs of the
unsafe-links test on my friend's cygwin Windows 2000 machine. I
suspect it's also the reason why the build.samba.org cygwin machine
hasn't
I've had the good fortune of getting a short-term job, but it is going
to be very intense and I won't have time for the rsync mailing list.
I'm sure the rest of the rsync team will be able to cover most of the
questions and future updates, and I've told them they can contact me if
they need my
Thanks to all for your help. I got it working and am in the process of
refining my configuration to do what I need it to do. I wish I could
tell you everything I did to get it working but it would be too
confusing. I finally started over and that's what made everything start
working.
Thanks
Hello.
I just started messing around with RSync to
synchronize some RRD files between a couple BSD/Linux
boxes. To test, I'm just trying to sync about 20 of
these files which are about 256KB each. It seems that
the full contents of each file are being transferred
each time; i.e., the
I hacked config.h to undefine HAVE_SOCKETPAIR. Cygwin's socketpair was
failing randomly, causing errors on roughly a third of testsuite runs.
Having made that alteration (so rsync was using pipe, not socketpair), I ran
the testsuite 100 times. SSH tests were not enabled.
Out of 100 runs, 4 hung
To follow up on this... I found the --stats option and
here's what I'm getting:
Number of files: 36
Number of files transferred: 36
Total file size: 10200816 bytes
Total transferred file size: 10200816 bytes
Literal data: 10200816 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 576
Total bytes
James Kilton wrote:
To follow up on this... I found the --stats option and
here's what I'm getting:
Number of files: 36
Number of files transferred: 36
Total file size: 10200816 bytes
Total transferred file size: 10200816 bytes
Literal data: 10200816 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list
James Kilton wrote:
To follow up on this... I found the --stats option and
here's what I'm getting:
Number of files: 36
Number of files transferred: 36
Total file size: 10200816 bytes
Total transferred file size: 10200816 bytes
Literal data: 10200816 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
Thanks for the help guys. Turns out that I was using
two different versions: 2.55 (RedHat) and 2.54
(OpenBSD). I hadn't noticed that the OpenBSD package
was 1 version off. I installed 2.55 on another Linux
machine and the files now sync fine incrementally.
Add this one to the duh category.
I'd like to suggest that this is now a great time to create two separate cvs
branches for the rsync product. One, which I'll tentatively call 2_5, would
hold the version of the code that has been released to the world as 2.5.6.
The other, which I'll tentatively call head, would hold the
On 28 Jan 2003, Green, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think splitting the branches will also let us be a little more
experimental in the development branch, at least until we get near
the next release phase, because we'll always have the field release
in which to make crucial bug fixes
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:24:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 28 Jan 2003, Green, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think splitting the branches will also let us be a little more
experimental in the development branch, at least until we get near
the next release phase, because we'll
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:24:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I agree that this would be a good approach if and only if there is
energy to do lots of development in the head branch. What do you have
in mind?
I have several patches that I'm planning to check in soon (I'm waiting
to see if we
I have several patches that I'm planning to check in soon (I'm waiting
to see if we have any post-release tweaking to and/or branching to do).
This list is off the top of my head, but I think it is complete:
And I have several things I would like to work on and submit:
- Fix the MD4 block
26 matches
Mail list logo
