Estimated users.
I do a rsync between server with these option
-aurvlpogt (option t, for time)
and problem is the time file are not the same in tow server.
Imagine a I have a log file called access_log.
One server execute rsync to other server and time files don´t match between
themselves,
Hi,
we do a nightly backup using rsync (v2.5.6 as server on RedHat 7.3 and rsync
2.5.5 on Windows 2000/Cygwin). The backup media connected to the
Windows-Client is a VFAT-formatted Maxtor USB-Disk.
Everytime I run rsync from the windows-client, the following error occurs:
--- snip ---
rsync.exe
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:21:32AM +0100, Lejf Diecks [ergo!via GmbH] wrote:
Hi,
we do a nightly backup using rsync (v2.5.6 as server on RedHat 7.3 and rsync
2.5.5 on Windows 2000/Cygwin). The backup media connected to the
Windows-Client is a VFAT-formatted Maxtor USB-Disk.
Everytime I
At 11:21 19/02/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I guess it has something to do with the with the VFAT-formatted USB-disk -
I've tried the same command with my local NTFS-formatted harddisk as backup
media - and everything works fine!
Any ideas :o( ??
It could be a shortfalling of the VFAT filesystem -
I am trying to set up a MacOS X rsync server and am not having much
success at the moment. I'm able to see the share alright, but here
is what I get when I actually try to copy anything to the server:
#rsync -vz /Users/myhome localhost::backup
@ERROR: setgroups failed
rsync: connection
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:28:58AM -0500, lists wrote:
I am trying to set up a MacOS X rsync server and am not having much
success at the moment. I'm able to see the share alright, but here
is what I get when I actually try to copy anything to the server:
#rsync -vz /Users/myhome
The first two lines are the daemon stopping/starting:
Feb 19 06:48:11 x rsyncd[25661]: rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or
SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(280)
Feb 19 06:48:18 x rsyncd[29518]: rsyncd version 2.5.5 starting,
listening on port 873
Feb 19 11:48:26 x rsyncd[29520]: setgroups failed:
Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
What is the origin of the expression the primrose path to dalliance?
William Shakespeare, in Hamlet. For a nice explanation, see
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mprimrose.html
Thanks
PG
--
Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant, Stratus Technologies.
Voice:
Steve Bonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I couldn't get the ssh tests to work in rsync 2.5.6 and it doesn't appear
that they ever could have worked. There were two problems with the script
I noticed:
1) The from directory is never populated with files to test. It looked
like the
I have tried using the Cygwin rsync binaries, but found them so slow as to
be unusable. After 1-1/2 hours, it was still 100% CPU trying to sync two
1.6GB files. (It finally finished moving one, but was still thinking about
the second.) Using scp, it takes less than an hour to move the two
Sviatoslav Sviridov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
It would be good if attached patch will be included in upstream. This
patch adds option --apt-support for rsync and with this option rsync
will print some additional information about file being transfered. No
program logic changed. Having this
I read in the archives that somebody has a faster binary version floating
around. How might I get ahold of it? (If you have it, would it be possible
to e-mail me a copy?)
Fetch 2.5.6 and apply the patch in patches/craigb-perf.diff before you
build it.
Craig
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:11:16AM -0500, lists wrote:
This version I'm using is actually built from fink. Here's the man
page:
ERRORS
The setgroups() call will fail if:
[EINVAL] The value of ngroups is greater than {NGROUPS_MAX}.
[EPERM]The
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:25:43PM -0500, Paul Green wrote:
Sviatoslav Sviridov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
It would be good if attached patch will be included in upstream. This
patch adds option --apt-support for rsync and with this option rsync
will print some additional information
I've just built the binary under MacOS X10.2.4, for those interested on it just
contact
me.
Jaime Macaya.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
when dealing with 1GB+ files, rsync is
4-5 _times_ slower than rcp.
What OS?
I'm downloading cygwin (slow) to see if I can compile a Windows rsync that
doesn't show this nasty behaviour.
I just did a test on about 3.5GB total, Linux - Linux. I got 11 minutes vs.
9 minutes on , which for bulk
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 05:55, va_public wrote:
I got used to rsync's -v --progress option so much that I used it
instead of rcp even to simply copy files across the network. I dont
like software that doesnt talk to me! :-) I like the percentage bar
that --progress gives!
To my surprise,
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 05:55, va_public wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a
sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@l.../msg05219.html
OK. I read the
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size.
According to the archives, block size doesn't fix anything. At any rate, I'm
highly disappointed that rsync is relying on statistical good fortune.
We've used rsync extensively in our company for moving
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:53:05PM -, va_public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 05:55, va_public wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a
sufficiently
large block size. See the
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 08:55, James Knowles wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size.
According to the archives, block size doesn't fix anything. At any rate, I'm
highly disappointed that rsync is relying on statistical good fortune.
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 08:53, va_public wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 05:55, va_public wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a
sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
Please don't mail to me seperately. It makes identifying
whether this was also sent to the list (where it belongs)
difficult. CCing me is OK as that gets filtered.
(oops i forgot to CC the list and just broke this rule myself)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:42:47PM -0500, George D. Plymale wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 11:36, Craig Barratt wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg05219.html
Let's be careful here. Rsync *does* work on 1GB+ files. What
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:03:16PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 11:36, Craig Barratt wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg05219.html
I wasn't aware that it had this. Was it there at the time of the
original discussion (Oct 2002)? The people involved in the discussion
then didn't seem to know this.
I wasn't aware of it in Oct 2002 during that discussion. I saw it in
the code a month or two after that. I haven't checked the
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 13:20, jw schultz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:03:16PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 11:36, Craig Barratt wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
[...]
However,
On 20 Feb 2003, Donovan Baarda abo-at-minkirri.apana.org.au |Rsync List| wrote:
RSYNC DOES NOT WORK WITH 1GB+ FILES... unless you have a sufficiently
large block size. See the following;
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg05219.html
This probably needs to be documented
28 matches
Mail list logo
