Hi:
I really want to know how rsync works.
Once it synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
into the dest-file?
Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
process
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-May/009380.html
Bingo! This patch indeed fixes the problem. Is this an 'official' patch and
is there an 'official' place to look for patches to released versions?
Many thnx, Andy
--
Andreas Ley, Rechenzentrum, Universitaet Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe,
I often post them to the mailing list, but the best place to find fixes
is in the CVS version. (This fix has been in CVS since early May, for
instance.) See the NEWS file from CVS for a good summary of what has
changed.
Ok. Many thanks again!
Bye, Andy
--
Andreas Ley, Rechenzentrum,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:26:23AM +0200, Andreas Ley wrote:
Bingo! This patch indeed fixes the problem. Is this an 'official' patch and
is there an 'official' place to look for patches to released versions?
I often post them to the mailing list, but the best place to find fixes
is in the CVS
I am doing this to rsync a file:
rsync -avz
/usr/local/websphere/appserver/hosts/default_host/jsp/servers/includes/file1
.txt backup.domain.com:jspfsp /var/log/rsync_backup.log
I get these error:
@ERROR: chroot failed
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (34 bytes read so far)
rsync error:
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Indeed, what you describe seems to have been the design motivation. I
can share what my desired application is: I want to create a mirror of a
public server onto my local machine which physically disconnected from the
Internet, and keep it current. So, I intend to first
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Pawe Goaszewski wrote:
After upgrade from previous version I can't run rsync.
2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsyncd version 2.6.2 starting, listening on port 873
2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
socket.c(466)
strace shows that
Wayne Davison wrote:
The knowledge or memory of that exact state is more likely to
reside with the receiver (who just left that state) than with the
sender (who may never have been in that state). Therefore it is more
likely to be useful to the receiver than to sender.
This is only true if you
That is it. The destination file is unaffected until rsync completes its
replacement, then the directory entry is repointed at the new file and the
reference to the old inode freed.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that the command you show is not a complete copy/paste job.
When you changed backup.amlaw.com or whatever it was to
backup.domain.com, you also removed one of the colons between that and
jspfsp, as the only time rsync does a chroot is as a server.
A chroot failure is almost
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:42:18PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
BTW, there is a work-around. If you don't mind duplicating the mirror
twice, one solution is to do a regular (no --write-batch) rsync update of one
copy of the
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:06:52AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Indeed, what you describe seems to have been the design motivation.
I
can share what my desired application is: I want to create a mirror of a
public server onto my local machine which
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 06:10, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:06:52AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
[...]
that the feature is useless, but just caution people that they need to
understand the assumptions that this use of rsync is based upon. Also,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
snip
I'm wondering if batch mode should be removed from the main rsync
release and relegated to a parallel project? It seems to me that a
better feature for the mainstream utility would be something
in send_file_name(), there is:
if (write_batch)
file-flags |= FLAG_TOP_DIR;
Can anyone explain this? It results in the file flags sent to the
batch file differing from the ones sent to the recevier by that one
bit. But, why?
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change
Wayne Davison writes:
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it
into CVS or the patches directory?
The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of
May. Strangely, I don't seem to
Once synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
into the dest-file?
Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
process interrupted by some problems(network problem
Date: Tue May 18 08:50:17 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15519
Modified Files:
generator.c
Log Message:
Output a message when we skip a server-excluded file.
Revisions:
generator.c 1.84 = 1.85
Date: Tue May 18 09:47:42 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/testsuite
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28719
Modified Files:
longdir.test
Log Message:
Added a little more quoting.
Revisions:
longdir.test1.10 = 1.11
Date: Tue May 18 09:53:28 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29952
Modified Files:
copy-atimes.diff date-only.diff dir-times.diff
Log Message:
Fixed failing hunks.
Revisions:
copy-atimes.diff1.7 = 1.8
Date: Tue May 18 09:54:52 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30104
Modified Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
A few minor text improvements.
Revisions:
NEWS1.176 = 1.177
Date: Tue May 18 09:52:32 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29758
Modified Files:
verify-patches
Log Message:
Do a better job of finding the .rej files to edit (since they can
be in a subdir).
Revisions:
verify-patches
22 matches
Mail list logo
