Re: why each time I do a file sync, it showed me that a file trasnfers is occured

2005-10-31 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 30 Oct 2005, Harry Putnam wrote: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --itemize-changes What is this? My rsync doesn't know about it. rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27 This was added in 2.6.4, 30 March 2005. If you're going to ask questions on the mailing list, it's

Re: Rsync with OCFS (RAC)

2005-10-31 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 31 Oct 2005, Mahmood Majadly wrote: The OCFS filesystem requires all reads/writes to be performed with the O_DIRECT option, thus bypassing cache. Oracle provide an updated Wasn't this resolved just last week, with a message from someone who was assured by Oracle that only writes need

Re: What would cause an unexpected massive transfer

2005-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Craig Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harry Putnam writes: I've rsynced two directory structures back and forth a few times. [snip] The file systems in volved are (xp)NTFS on one end and Fat32 on the external drive. This is the DST problem with how Fat32 represents mtime. Fat32 uses

Re: What would cause an unexpected massive transfer

2005-10-31 Thread Craig Barratt
Harry Putnam writes: Yeah, nice write up. Am I correct in thinking that since I've gone thru the long backup I'm now good till next time change? Yes. Further, if I converted the fs on the external drive to NTFS or create an ext3 partitions, this would never have happened? Yes. Craig --

error in rsync protocol data stream

2005-10-31 Thread Kevin Karwaski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Everyone, I've been running into a protocol error when attempting to rsync files between to hosts over ssh. Here is the line I've been using with the verbosity cranked up: rsync -a -e ssh -l test /localpath/to/sync xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx::module

Re: rsync when working on both sides...

2005-10-31 Thread Aaron Morris
On 10/30/05, Christian Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi rsync devs and users, I want to use rsync to synchronize home directories on two PCs. It works fine if I start rsync after working on a host each time I leave. But instead of operating modes host1 - host2 and host2 - host1 I would

rsync + incremental changes files

2005-10-31 Thread Lautaro Di Martino
Hi, Well, I need the procedure or how to do a full backup of archives to a directory. Then, do incremental backups in different directories. For example: source-dir to dest-dir a full backup. incremental of sources-dir and differential of backup-dir in `date +%m%h%y` Then, i should have a full

[Bug 3229] New: Don't make backup file if destination file wasn't modified

2005-10-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3229 Summary: Don't make backup file if destination file wasn't modified Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

Re: rsync + incremental changes files

2005-10-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:59 -0300, Lautaro Di Martino wrote: [...] When i try this over ssh, it copies everything again in the incremental directory. I can't reproduce this problem. When I try the same command (but with different directories) over ssh, the files are hard linked correctly.

Re: rsync + incremental changes files

2005-10-31 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:59:38PM -0300, Lautaro Di Martino wrote: Then, i have in the incremental directory symlinks to every file, becouse they aren't modified. That will nullify the --link-dest option -- if a file exists in the destination directory, the link-dest directory isn't used, and