Feature Request Creation date/time

2006-09-29 Thread Ian Webber
Hello, I use rsync tocopy personal data to various different machines for backup purposesand enjoy the robustness of the copy process. I was wondering if it was possible to add the option for rsync to copy the creation date and time as well as the modification time. This is really just a

rsyncing many files and hard links: optimisation suggestions?

2006-09-29 Thread Judith Retief
I suspect the standard optimisation - breaking up the rsync into smaller batches - is not going to work for us. This is our situation: We rsync two directories in /spool to a backup. They are large: almost 2mil files in the first dir, with about 4mil hard links in the second one linking to them.

Re: Feature Request Creation date/time

2006-09-29 Thread Wojtek.Pilorz
On typical UNIX system there is no such thing as file creation time; what ctime refers to is inode change time; Usually it cannot be set by user-mode software. So your request could be implemented only on specific platforms. And that would not make much sense, IMHO. On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Ian

Re: rsyncing many files and hard links: optimisation suggestions?

2006-09-29 Thread Jamie Lokier
Judith Retief wrote: If the problem is the actual disk access, then I can't think of anything to do. If it is the sorting, then cutting down the batch sizes should help, at the expense of having copies of some files rather than hard links. You can tell whether it's the disk accesses or the

Re: Feature Request Creation date/time

2006-09-29 Thread Ian Webber
Thanks for your response. I was wondering if it was a UNIX thing. I am using the cwRsync www.itefix.no on Windows 2000. I agree making platform specific changes wouldn't make much sense. I guess I best check out robocopy.exe and see if that can do what I need it to in this instance. For

Re: rsyncing many files and hard links: optimisation suggestions?

2006-09-29 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:10:51PM +0200, Judith Retief wrote: I'm going to have three copies of real-file, rather than one copy and two hard links, isn't it? Yes, rsync can only hard-link together the files that are in a single transfer. What version of rsync are you running? Hard-linking

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4132] temp file not removed on siganl (e.g. SIGINT)

2006-09-29 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4132 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|