Hello,
i have found, that major distros (especially opensuse) ship their rsync
packages with a lot of patches which i don`t find in the official rsync-patches
git.
Maybe there is a reason for that or i missed something or looked wrong, but
for convenience/transparency i have compiled a list
Hi.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:08:13 +0100 Allen Supynuk wrote:
To make matters worse, the file is on a read-only snapshot mounted
through NFS. In any case root squash is in effect, so super-user is
out.
Why not mounting this no_root_squash?
Is it not wrong to have partial archives (missing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
--- Comment #2 from Russell Black black.russ...@gmail.com 2013-02-02 22:59:17
UTC ---
If it helps to evaluate the patch, here is the difference in the code between
this one and the regular detect-renamed patch. Seems pretty straightforward.
$
It also means running the backups as root. Running as root in a root squash
environment is risky. In my case the (read-only snapshot of the) source is
considered broken if there are unreadable files, so I have no grounds for a
security exception.
I want the option to have the backup complete
Hi Folks,
i recently try to use rsync on devices. The goal is to sync two logical
volumes without copy the whole.
According to
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=tree
write-devices.diff
copy-devices.diff
should do the job.
I downloaded
