[Bug 13433] out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files

2018-05-16 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Day --- Just adding --protocol=29 falls back to the older chunk generator code and automatically selects 2MB chunks which is enough to at least make this work without a malloc error. -- You are

[Bug 13433] out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files

2018-05-16 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Day --- (In reply to Dave Gordon from comment #1) It looks like that's no longer allowed? rsync: --block-size=10485760 is too large (max: 131072) rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at

[Bug 13433] out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files

2018-05-16 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 --- Comment #1 from Dave Gordon --- Maybe try --block-size=10485760 --protocol=29 as mentioned here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10518#c8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Re: [Bug 5478] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32)

2018-05-16 Thread Dave Gordon via rsync
On 17/04/18 17:47, just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478 > > --- Comment #34 from David Nelson --- > FYI. Although when rsync ver. 3.0.9 is called in Ubuntu 12.04LTS to "push" > files to the server, e.g.,

Re: rsync sends -C and -x options silently

2018-05-16 Thread Wayne Davison via rsync
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:04 AM Anand Buddhdev via rsync < rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote: > This newer rsync version appears to be sending -C and -x options to the > server, even though they are not set on the client side. > It's not. What it is doing is sending information in the -eSTRING