[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #37 from elatl...@gmail.com --- The btrfs equivalent is a bit more rough but (link for rename); #./btrfs-snapshots-diff.py -sb -p /media/btrfs/v_1/s_1 -c /media/btrfs/v_1/s_2 | grep -E path=. | grep -v utimes | tail -n +2

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #36 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #35) > This is going off-topic On such an old bug with modern workarouds I think it's worth talking about. > backup drive is NTFS currently, which would

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #35 from Claudius Ellsel --- (In reply to elatllat from comment #34) >Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's >>what it's for. This is going off-topic, but my backup drive is NTFS currently,

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #34 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #33) Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's what it's for. If you want to review changes before backup you can just diff

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #33 from Claudius Ellsel --- Hm, those backups won't work on file level, though afaik. Thus I cannot easily access files on a backup drive for example. Also I want to use this as some kind of confirm stage a bit like committing with git

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

2021-01-15 Thread Rsync CVS commit messages
The branch, master has been updated via ec1d5d56 Add `--with-nobody-user=FOO` configure option. via 26befd9c Cygwin python3 is now 3.8 w/o commonmark lib. [buildall] from a28c4558 Fix spelling error in man page. (#124) https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master

Re: Bug when using rsync -r --delete -b --backup-dir

2021-01-15 Thread Wayne Davison via rsync
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:33 PM CRTS via rsync wrote: > then the empty directory does end up in bkp. > You mean "does not". That is correct, as it only creates backup dirs to hold backup files. I recall this being specifically chosen as the desired outcome but not the details of why (since it

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #32 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #31) Yes any COW FS with "send/receive" will have inherent rename handaling, and will be faster than rsync because the diffs are inherent. With zfs one can even

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #31 from Claudius Ellsel --- To me and others it still seems relevant. I have to admit though that I haven't looked much into other solutions for backups like btrfs send/receive commands. I suppose that were the ones you meant? Note

[Bug 8367] Add a feature to --rename-existing files

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 Claudius Ellsel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claudius.ell...@live.de --- Comment #7

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #30 from elatl...@gmail.com --- This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. --

[Bug 10263] Extend Behaviour of the --fuzzy Parameter to Consider Directories

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263 --- Comment #3 from Claudius Ellsel --- I have to admit that I only skimmed through the description. There is definitely some more to this than in the other bug. Have a look at https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294#c14 though. The

[Bug 10263] Extend Behaviour of the --fuzzy Parameter to Consider Directories

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263 --- Comment #2 from Haravikk --- It's certainly similar but I wouldn't say a direct duplicate; 2294 is requesting detection of move/rename *somehow* which is a tricky proposition (especially with rsync defaulting towards incremental send rather

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #29 from Claudius Ellsel --- As another motivation for this, I use rsync for backups and would like to be able to see whether files have just been renamed or were deleted and some others newly created (which currently cannot be

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Claudius Ellsel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claudius.ell...@live.de --- Comment #28

[Bug 10263] Extend Behaviour of the --fuzzy Parameter to Consider Directories

2021-01-15 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263 Claudius Ellsel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claudius.ell...@live.de --- Comment #1