: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
-
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Goettingen (GWDG)
Am
.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
-
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche
.
In my experience, re-checking the already received partial blocks takes
about 3 minutes for a 4 GB partial file.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
Hi once more,
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Donald Pearson wrote:
I am looking to do state-full resume of rsync transfers.
My network environment is is an unreliable and slow satellite
infrastructure, and the files I need to send are approaching 10
if
there was anything native in rsync for this type
of operation.
If you are concerned about giving the rest of the system
some time to breathe then just nice the rsync process.
nice -n 19 rsync ... etc
This would not help, regarding i/o.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Mark Constable wrote:
On 2010-06-07, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Is it possible to sleep 1 second after each file
is rsynced?
If you are concerned about giving the rest of the system
some time to breathe then just nice the rsync process.
nice -n 19 rsync ... etc
HUGE numbers of files under linux. ;)
As a side note, Solaris does not seem to have this problem, presumably
because the kernel handles inode/dentry caching in a different way.
Thanks for your report. Really a mail to keep for future.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e
.
This would not help if the high CPU load is a result of i/o wait.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
Hi,
please avoid top posting.
It needs reconstruction to see the history.
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Ali, Saqib wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Eberhard Moenkeberg emoe...@gwdg.de wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Ali, Saqib wrote:
We have a very high utilization rsync server. We can handle large
if [ ${MAILIT} = yes ]; then
V1=is uptodate
V2=is a hard link
V3=^backed up
V4=^deleting
grep -v ${V1}\|${V2}\|${V3}\|${V4} ${PROT} | \
mail -s${SUBJ} (RC=${RC}) ${MAILTO}
#else
# mail -s${SUBJ} (RC=${RC}) __nomail__ ${MAILTO} ${PROT}
fi
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe
/masanip/ACH/test\\\ file /tmp/mydir/
rsync: link_stat /tmp/test\ file failed: No such file or directory (2)
Don't you see it: one / too much.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoe...@gwdg.de, e...@kki.org)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoe...@gwdg.de Tel
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:21 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
I just setup my first rsyncd server and all is working well as far as
file syncing goes. However, I am a bit baffled by the fact that some of
the log entries in the rsyncd.log file are
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, lewis butler wrote:
On 27-Feb-2009, at 21:16, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
I would thing
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Madhavan Chari wrote:
We want to use the rsync 3 for incremental file transfer of our File system
from one box to another, however there are about a million files
to be copied, so just wanted to know by any one of your's previous
experience with rsync 3, will these
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, chuang liu wrote:
I use rsync to transfer multiple files from several clients to a server in
parallel. I am wondering how many concurrent connections the server should
handle to maximize the throughput (number of bytes written to server). In
an extreme case, if only
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 05:36 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory I
have this error:
sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av --progress --stats /mnt/source/* /mnt/destination/
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Samuel Vogel wrote:
The vanished files problem is really REALLY annoying... It renders rsync
unusable for me:
sent 22972933 bytes received 2399590976 bytes 310684.69 bytes/sec
total size is 98068497125 speedup is 40.48
client_run2 waiting on 18377
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Melmi wrote:
Eberhard wrote:
Filenames will stay original. rsync creates the true original directory
structure (as far as needed) below the backup-dir, so no need to change
filenames.
I know. We misunderstood each other, I guess. Example:
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Melmi wrote:
it would be nice if rsync could call an external command to delete
files. Than one could call a secure deletion tool like wipe, which
overwrites files a few times before deleting them.
Right now Im wiping personal data which I dont need anymore, but
HI,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Melmi wrote:
rsync will mv the files to the backup-dir (not cp).
Good idea. However, wipe has some mechanism to prevent recovering of
the old filename. I dont know wether it does anything else than a bunch
of moves with mv.
Using you solution, the filename
system, a process's environment
variables are only readable by its owner. However, I prefer to use a
password file anyway.
Environment variables are shell internals. If you do not 'export' them,
not even subshells can see them.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
a more detailed rsync script excluding certain areas?
/proc and /sys need to be excluded.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs
added the --chmod=TWEAKS option that will allow you to specify
something like this:
rsync -av --chmod=Da+x,a+r src/ dest
That makes sure that all dirs get +x and everything gets +r.
Thanks Wayne. A long awaited improvement for mirror servers.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED
of --help.
I guess some spaces in the output number would be sufficient and best.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart
of your local only rsync instances has to read the entire file in
order to find out that only 200 bytes are to transfer. ;-))
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting
.
This is not a race condition.
rsync will continue till the end, and then just give exit code 24.
It is the same with 23.
So consider these exit codes as fulfilled.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
before invoking rsync.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
:
NFS_MNT=/mnt/plantx
mount | grep $NFS_MNT /dev/null
if [ ! $? = 0 ]; then
echo source not mounted, nothing done,
exit 99
fi
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read
understand that --ignore-errors isnt what i need. I tried it anyway.
You have to do it on the server side, with
ignore nonreadable = true
in /etc/rsyncd.conf.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
-corrupt files) and do the checksums to determine
which files need to be transferred.
Why do you want to say ignore timestamps if just the corrected files
have newer than the corrupt ones?
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:47:52AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
this local rsync phase may need a long long (currently very long
long here) time
Are you running with the --delete option? If so, switch to using the
--delete-after option (which I
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
= 15000
ftp:3 03:47:16 ~ #
Cheeers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
least should be ) -vv statistics.
Look at the time parameters.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
it; or
copy it somewhere to /tmp/; or whatever.)
this may be easy to implement---a command-line option ---use-rm= and a
system call instead of an unlink call.
possible?
Necessary?
We already have --backup-dir= which indeed can preserve all the to be
deleted files.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard
the directory above and exclude what you do not want.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 23:49:28 +0100 (CET), Eberhard Moenkeberg [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to use the command rsync to have a perfect copy of each
one of five directories and their contents. How can I do that at once?
I know that I
behaviour?
rsync has a very differentiated set of return codes.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I want to be 100% sure that rsync copies something from one location to
another.
However, I did not see an option which would make rsync retry an operation
quality
consequences for rsyncd, and about the efforts for your special case
(=none, even contrary).
Add more RAM to your server and/or improve your I/O throughput.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org
compression.
Compression is a transfer option. No influence on file comparision.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart
it be possible to start
bulding both databases in parallel, or shortly after each other?
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:27:55AM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Later, there are two separate threads anyways.
They are separate processes that don't share memory, and sharing memory
would be required to compare the two files lists after
)
fordblks: 142712 (bytes free)
keepcost: 135048 (bytes in releasable chunk)
end RC=0 040810.0100 040810.0822
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman
responsiveness again if you would
add about 100 disk heads.
If you do not like to maintain so many non-solid-state parts, you can
try to add RAM to the server first.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org
} ${SRC} ${DST} ${PROT} 21
RC=$?
if test ${RC} = 0 -o ${RC} = 23; then
echo normal termination.
elif test ${RC} = 10; then
echo no connection.
elif test ${RC} = 24; then
echo OK, but some file(s) vanished.
fi
and distinguish many more cases.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
51 matches
Mail list logo
