[Bug 13082] [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations

2022-11-14 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Bartlett --- Samba 4.11 moved to GnuTLS for our MD5 and other hash operations, and so uses any hardware optimisation available there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. --

[Bug 13082] [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations

2020-05-23 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 --- Comment #5 from Ben RUBSON --- Really nice additions, it looks promising, thank you very much Jorrit & Wayne ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid

[Bug 13082] [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations

2020-05-23 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 13082] [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations

2020-05-22 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 --- Comment #3 from Ben RUBSON --- Yes, and as discussed there also, sounds like xxhash could be a better solution than SSE / hardware backed MD5. Feel free to close this then if not so relevant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 13082] [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations

2020-05-18 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 --- Comment #1 from Ben RUBSON --- First info / first patch there : https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2020-May/032175.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies