[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #17 from Wayne Davison --- I just tweaked the option name to --open-noatime, which I think is clearer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #15 from Michal Ruprich --- Thanks Samuel, now I can enable tests during build in Fedora and keep the noatime option as well. Still though, it would be good to have upstream approval on this :/ -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Samuel Henrique changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15524|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #13 from Samuel Henrique --- Created attachment 15524 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=15524=edit Adds --noatime option for 3.1.3 Updated the patch to fix "make test" with the help of Paul Slootman. I'm happy to say

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #12 from Samuel Henrique --- The patch is currently introducing a regression on the target "test" (make test). /usr/bin/ld: syscall.o: in function `do_open': ./syscall.c:206: undefined reference to `noatime' It happens when the target

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #11 from Samuel Henrique --- This patch has been being applied to the Debian packaging of rsync since 2014 (5 years now). As Michal Ruprich said, this patch requires the build to be made in a certain way as it can lead to undefined

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #10 from Michal Ruprich --- Hi, I think that ideally you should decide what to do with this. This almost 10 years old bug is still here and it seems no one from the rsync developers paid any attention to this. If you are not planning

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #9 from Michal Ruprich --- Did any of you who uses rsync with noatime patch had problems with running 'make check' command? It seems to me that some of the source files might be compiling in different order than

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #8 from Michal Ruprich --- Is there any update on this feature? Is there a plan to merge the patch into master branch of rsync? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. --

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #7 from cyril...@gmail.com --- +1 I'm currently using a locally patched version, because I'm using rsync to mirror my whole data daily, plus using a deduplicating backup tool weekly that stores atime (so if rsync sets atime, the metadata

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #6 from don...@gmx.com --- +1 from here as well. I understand the arguments about the limited usefulness of the atime field in general, and I agree with much of it, but to me there are more use cases than what's mentioned in what I've

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Martin von Gagern martin.vgag...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9278||review?

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Martin von Gagern martin.vgag...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 devz...@web.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devz...@web.de --- Comment #2 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 --- Comment #3 from nicolas.geo...@normalesup.org 2010-08-22 07:49 CST --- They have a similar purpose, but they do not work the same way at all. My patch (comment #2) politely asks the kernel not to update the atime of opened files.