Recently, I have investigated FUSE as an option for implementing something
like I proposed to this list in April, 2005 (instead of inotify).
Just yesterday, I submitted some patches to the mysqlfs-general mailing
list that improve mysqlfs a bit. With a little more work (which I may or
may not
Recently, I have investigated FUSE as an option for implementing something
like I proposed to this list in April, 2005 (instead of inotify).
Just yesterday, I submitted some patches to the mysqlfs-general mailing
list that improve mysqlfs a bit. With a little more work (which I may or
may not
Have you considered using a traditional network filesystem instead of
putting together your own system on top of rsync? I think AFS (the
Andrew File System) supports the kind of replication you want.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
Interesting ideas.
I envision the VFS Change Logger as a (hopefully very thin) middle-ware
that sits between the kernel's VFS interfaces and a real filesystem, like
ext3, reiser, etc. The VFS Change Logger will pass VFS calls to the
underlying filesystem driver, but it will make note of
On Tue, 2005-04-12 23:57:37 -0400, Lester Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I envision the VFS Change Logger as a (hopefully very thin) middle-ware
that sits between the kernel's VFS interfaces and a real filesystem, like
ext3, reiser, etc. The VFS Change Logger
Lester Hightower wrote
PeerFS is a many-to-many replication system where all peers in the
cluster are read/write. Constant Replicator is a one-to-many system where
only one master is read/write, and every mirror is read-only. Replication
communication between hosts in both systems is via
On 4/12/05, Lester Hightower wrote:
The actual replication happens in user-land with rsync as the transport.
I think rsync will have to be tweaked a little to make this work, but
given all the features already in rsync I don't think this will be a big
deal. I envision an rsync running on
This is only my second email to the rsync mailing list. My first was sent
under the title Re: TODO hardlink performance optimizations on Jan 3,
2004. The response of the rsync developers to that email was remarkable
(in my opinion). I felt that the rsync performance enhancements that
resulted
Lester Hightower wrote:
I envision the VFS Change Logger as a (hopefully very thin) middle-ware
that sits between the kernel's VFS interfaces and a real filesystem, like
ext3, reiser, etc. The VFS Change Logger will pass VFS calls to the
underlying filesystem driver, but it will make note of
