jw schultz writes:
I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and
craigb-perf but i don't want to slow things down.
CVS is solid on *x now.
As noted in the follow-up emails, it would be great if craigb-perf
goes into CVS just after the next release. That will give it
plenty of testing
I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and
craigb-perf but i don't want to slow things down.
CVS is solid on *x now.
I'd really like to get craigb-perf in an easier-to-implement condition. I
just reverted from 2.5.7 *back* to 2.5.6 because I tried the craigb-perf
patches and they
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:49:48PM -0500, Jim Salter wrote:
I just reverted from 2.5.7 *back* to 2.5.6 because I tried the
craigb-perf patches and they made an INCREDIBLE difference in
performance, and I couldn't get the patches to work right on 2.5.7.
I note that the patch appears to apply to
WayneD the [craigb-perf] patch appears to apply to 2.5.7 without problem,
so I'm
WayneD curious what problem you found (I didn't try to compile or run it).
It applies fine, but it won't compile (on my FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x systems).
There's a warning that's got something to do with Realloc defined
io.o: In function `read_unbuffered':
/home/jimbo/rsync/rsync-2.5.7/io.c:324: undefined reference to
`Realloc'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/home/jimbo/rsync/rsync-2.5.7.
Note: rsync-2.5.7 *without* the craigb-perf patch compiles, installs, and
operates without errors on the same
You should be able to change this line in the [craigb-perf] patch:
+ buffer = Realloc(buffer, remaining);
To this line:
+ buffer = realloc_array(buffer, char, remaining);
and that should fix it.
Worked fine. Thanks Wayne - recompiling 2.5.7 and reinstalling it on all my
systems now.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:53:56AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
I'm working on updating the patch for the 2.6.0 release
FYI, I just checked in an update to the patches/craigb-perf.diff file in
CVS that makes it apply to the upcoming 2.6.0 version. Some very basic
testing showed that it worked
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:42:29PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Below is a revised file with a TOC at the top.
Cool, looks like you did a very thorough edit pass (as compared to my
quick once-over). The TOC makes it much friendlier too.
Once you get that checked in, I think we may be ready for a
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:58AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:42:29PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Below is a revised file with a TOC at the top.
Cool, looks like you did a very thorough edit pass (as compared to my
quick once-over). The TOC makes it much friendlier
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:02:26PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:58AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:42:29PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Below is a revised file with a TOC at the top.
Cool, looks like you did a very thorough edit pass (as
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:32:07PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
would you care to take the bull by the horns and produce a release
candidate for 2.5.8 so that the rsync enthusiasts on the rsync mailing
list can give it a whirl prior to an official release (hopefully by
Christmas)?
I was just
On Mon 15 Dec 2003, Wayne Davison wrote:
Yes, I'd like to get the CVS version finished up and a new release made.
Good to hear!
- What should we call the new version? I'm leaning towards 2.6.0
because of the new features (such as --files-from) and the various
large changes (such as
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
The new wildmatch stuff should probably get a mild caution in the
release notes.
Yes, it has the potential to trip up advanced users. I'm thinking about
a short blurb that explains how to create exlude patterns that behave
the same on
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and craigb-perf but i
don't want to slow things down.
It sounds like Cygwin might be fixing the cause of the hang on
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:51:25AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
I made one pass through the TODO and INSTALL files looking for outdated
info. I'd appreciate some other eyes giving these a quick scan.
I just did a pass on the TODO
15 matches
Mail list logo
