On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:54:34AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:00:56AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
make_bak_dir mkdir
/backup/naxos.premier-lnc.com/2004-06-09/home/ddegrolard/profile/Local
Settings/Application Data failed: File exists
This is a bug
Hi again,
This issue solved itself rather annoyingly since we use flash memory in
our newer devices (which had slipped my mind). So we must erase the
memory first and then load.
Cheers, Greger
Donovan Baarda wrote:
G'day,
From: Greger Cronquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
compiled binaries are
Wayne Davison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yup, I was thinking the same thing. One way to make your feature safer
would be to turn it into a config-file setting (and leave the script
outside the download/upload area). Since a non-daemon setup should be
able
Hi There
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:49:56PM -0500, Paula A. LeBlanc wrote:
Rsync version 2.6.0 on a HP B.11.00
Rsync version 2.4.6 on Solaris 8
Make sure youre using same version of rsync on both ends. Mismatches
like this one have been known to produce odd results.
Regards
Tomasz Ciolek
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:33:29AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
Hi as I'm a real newbie to rsync I'd better apoligise if this is 'old hat'.
Its OK! the only silly question is that which is not asked.
We all were newbies once or twice...
[SNIP]
The DOS shell command I'm using is this:
It is the 55 function variety of Swiss Army Knife already and my boss is asking me to
add yet another blade. :-)
wally
-Original Message-
From: Chris Shoemaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Wayne Davison
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
Summary: poor performance with large block size
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Thank you Wayne, It works.
Jiang Wensheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-06-16
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:05:09AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
Adding an option to make rsync do this wouldn't be very hard
I've whipped up a patch and checked-in the diff to the patches dir. If
you either checkout
Hi, folks.
I'm having some trouble getting to the source signature for rsync:
http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig
Several other mirrors seem to have the same problem, i.e., the file is
unreadable. Is it just me?
Thanks,
A. Daniel King, System Analyst
Fiserv, Inc.
HP-UX,
Hi All...
I use rsync to backup most of my servers to an offsite co-located server.
I've been using this setup for about a month or so now and have been
generally pleased with the operation as a whole.
But one thing bothers me:
I use the following command to actually do the transfers:
rsync
My personal preference was to mount a share from the file server on the client and
essentially do the sync all locally on the client but rsync doesn't seem to like doing
this very much (apparently this is advised against),
What doesn't rsync like? Do you mean something like a rsync between a
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:15:00PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
e.g.
rsync -x -e ssh src_dir remote:dst_share
ssh remote /usr/local/bin/cleanup
You don't need the separate ssh connection if you use --rsync-path to
point to a script that first runs rsync (using the supplied args) and
then does
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:51:14PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot rsync
anyway, how do I update?
cd rsync
cvs up
The server details are remembered inside the CVS dirs, so once you
checkout, you don't need to remind cvs where the files came from
(you
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:42:45AM -0400, King, Daniel wrote:
http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig
I can do a wget of that URL without problem. I get a very weird error
if I try to use Firefox 0.9, though, which appears to be caused by their
web server returning bogus MIME
Hi
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27
Debian 3.0 Woody
I have tested this with one simple file, my example is shown below.
Does anyone have any suggestions to rectify this?
Thanks, Wayne. I was using Firefox.
Could you tell me what I am doing wrong with this signature?
$ ll rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz
-rw--- 1 dking users 515402 Jun 16 09:36 rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz
-rw--- 1 dking users 65 Jun 16 14:49
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:16:30AM -0400, Collins, Kevin wrote:
Number of files: 161530
Number of files transferred: 327
Total file size: 97936829135 bytes
Total transferred file size: 945709165 bytes
Literal data: 741315984 bytes
Matched data: 204393181 bytes
File list size: 3446549
Total
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:14:32PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
The description of --link-dest in the rsync man page should probably
clarify that DIR is, unless it is an absolute path, relative to the
destination directory, not the CWD.
This is in the --link-dest description in CVS:
Like
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:35:39PM -0400, King, Daniel wrote:
Could you tell me what I am doing wrong with this signature?
You need to fetch the key so gpg can check the signature (I signed the
file, not Dave). The key is available through the public keyserver
network. One way to get it is to
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
Wayne... Thanks for the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Andrew Smith-MAGAZINES wrote:
My personal preference was to mount a share from the file server on the client and
essentially do the sync all locally on the client but rsync doesn't seem to like
doing this very much (apparently this is advised
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:30:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Do any rsync developers care to confirm/deny? [...] I've used rsync
over NFS with no problems.
It has been said many times before that using network-mounted disks is
suboptimal because rsync is optimizing the data transfer, not
Wayne,
That's great stuff. What do you think about a cut-n-paste of this example and
explanation into the documentation somewhere?
-Chris
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:02:17PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:16:30AM -0400, Collins, Kevin wrote:
Number of files: 161530
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:37:25PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:30:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Do any rsync developers care to confirm/deny? [...] I've used rsync
over NFS with no problems.
It has been said many times before that using network-mounted
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:30:16PM +0800, Jason Potter wrote:
Hi There,
This post is brought about due to the following two:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10702.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10709.html
I have a situation where I
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 06:21:15AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
Summary: poor performance with large block size
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: other
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred)
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 18:01, Greger Cronquist wrote:
Hi again,
This issue solved itself rather annoyingly since we use flash memory in
our newer devices (which had slipped my mind). So we must erase the
memory first and then load.
Last time I played with flash, you could erase a block at
Wayne,
It's taken a little while for me to get more familiar with the
code, but I think I've reached a good breakpoint in improving
batch-mode. Let me highlight some of the changes in the
attached patch:
* --write-batch and --read-batch arguments are no
Date: Wed Jun 16 23:33:19 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsyncweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19119
Modified Files:
index.html
Log Message:
- Switched over to an asc gpg signature.
- Got rid of the bogus 2.6.1 download links.
Revisions:
index.html
31 matches
Mail list logo
