The branch, master has been updated
via 1c9bb168 Unify the checksum context memory, since we only use one
at a time.
from 799de21a Fixed the use of openssl MD4 for transfer checksums.
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 799de21a Fixed the use of openssl MD4 for transfer checksums.
from 1cb1edeb Optional openssl support for MD4 pre-transfer checksums
(but, sadly, not transfer checksums).
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371
--- Comment #7 from Wayne Davison ---
If you don't want something deleted on the receiving side, you need to protect
it via either a protect rule or an exclude rule. Using --delete-excluded just
turns all exclude rules into hide rules, which
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371
Haravikk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
Thank you, Sebastian.
> On 23 May 2020, at 13:37, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior via rsync
> wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-22 22:54:18 [-0700], Wayne Davison via rsync wrote:
>> Thanks for the optimizing patches, Jorrit! I've merged your latest changes
>> into the git master branch.
>
> Wouldn't it be
On Sat, 23 May 2020 10:21:31 -0700
Wayne Davison via rsync wrote:
> Adding optional support for openssl's crypto library is also a good
> idea.
There is also libressl to consider, if you're considering libraries.
Karl
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
--
The branch, master has been updated
via 1cb1edeb Optional openssl support for MD4 pre-transfer checksums
(but, sadly, not transfer checksums).
from 15c1162b Add optional use of the openssl crypto lib for MD5.
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
On 2020-05-23 10:21:31 [-0700], Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> Adding optional support for openssl's crypto library is also a good idea.
I posted [0] openssl support with SHA1 support and asked whether openssl is
possible. At that time added md5 and I think md4. I received no feedback
bach then but if
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 4:37 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <
rs...@ml.breakpoint.cc> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to add support for a crypto library (like openssl)
> which would provide optimized algorithms for more than just one platform
> without the need to maintain it separately?
>
Adding
The branch, master has been updated
via 15c1162b Add optional use of the openssl crypto lib for MD5.
from a7175ee0 Mention a few more news items.
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
On 2020-05-22 22:54:18 [-0700], Wayne Davison via rsync wrote:
> Thanks for the optimizing patches, Jorrit! I've merged your latest changes
> into the git master branch.
Wouldn't it be better to add support for a crypto library (like openssl)
which would provide optimized algorithms for more
This is great! However, do you have access to a big-endian CPU? I'm
not sure how relevant this still is but I've read at some point that
xxhash might have produced different (reverse?) hashes on different
endian CPUs. It may be prudent to acutally test if that is the case
with this implementation
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371
--- Comment #5 from Haravikk ---
Oh, I see; so hide actually does what I need, you confused me with the mention
of not using --delete-excluded, as it actually seems to work just fine with a
mixture of hide and exclude rules for different items.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #5 from Ben RUBSON ---
Really nice additions, it looks promising, thank you very much Jorrit & Wayne !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
That's excellent news!
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 08:11, Wayne Davison via rsync
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM Bill Wichser via rsync <
> rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Attached is the patch we applied [to add xxhash checksums]
>
>
> Thanks, Bill! I finally got around to finishing up
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371
--- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison ---
You don't add an exclude rule, you add a hide rule. An exclude rule is a
combination of a hide (server side) and a protect (client side). So you choose
between the 3 idioms (hide, protect, exclude) depending
The branch, master has been updated
via a7175ee0 Mention a few more news items.
from 68516f91 Add "input" handling for cmd_txt_*() pkglib.py.
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM Bill Wichser via rsync
wrote:
> Attached is the patch we applied [to add xxhash checksums]
Thanks, Bill! I finally got around to finishing up some checksum
improvements and have added support for xxhash in the master branch. The
latest version in git now picks
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:08 AM Jorrit Jongma via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> This patch introduces an optimized assembler version of md5_process(), the
> inner loop of MD5 checksumming. It affects the performance of all MD5
> operations in rsync - including block matching and
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
21 matches
Mail list logo
