https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-18 18:08 ---
We at PlanetMirror see this error regularly from our upstream gentoo mirrors,
as well as a plethora of
other upstream mirrors. Personally, while I hope this fix in
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-23 23:36 ---
this should apply to both fifos and sockets.
creation of both are unprivileged operations,
see mkfifo(2), socket(2)/bind(2) on freebsd.
suggest moving/modifying
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2913
Summary: rsync of symlinks on =bsd needs lutimes(2) and
lchmod(2)
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2914
Summary: rsync bugzilla needs guest user
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2913
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-26 09:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=1336)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1336action=view)
Use lchmod and lutimes, if present
Please test this patch and see if
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2913
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 03:38 ---
the patch applies clean to: cvs co -D '2005-07-07 22:53:59-'
which refers to the latest src rev in the patch [not knowing which
tag or date to apply to].
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
Summary: regression with hardlinked devices
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2913
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 16:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=1344)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1344action=view)
Make hard-linking work with symlinks and devices
The attached patch
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 17:01 ---
added a fuller test case...
note freebsd link(2) currently doesn't hardlink
symlinks or directories. there's also something
called whiteout. all conceivably
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 21:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=1345)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1345action=view)
Allow devices (etc.) to get their permissions updated
Rsync has from
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2938
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 17:20 ---
The same applies to old DOS names like AUX, COM1, LPT1 or PRN.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 00:19 ---
yep, squished, thx.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
Summary: stdout with [-v] -H --link-dest and slink/sock/fifo/regf
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2938
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:20 ---
The latest error is:
Read from remote host hostname: Connection reset by peer
All this tells you is that the connection closed. See the issues/debugging
webpage for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 22:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=1356)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1356action=view)
patch, tweak to taste per comment
allow nonroot to try do_mknod()
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-05 04:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=1357)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1357action=view)
strace -f /usr/local/rsync-2.6.6/bin/rsync
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
Summary: rsync hangs when client put files to server (checked in
2.6.6 too)
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
Summary: build error on sinix: off64_t unknown
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Summary: Mac OS X/Darwin incorrectly shows read sockets ready
when they aren't
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: PPC
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3021
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 09:56 ---
Sorry, I'am not using:
rsync -aHvzc --delete --delete-excluded --exclude-from=$TOEXCULE_LIST_FILES
but
rsync -aHvzc --delete--files-from=$TORSYNC_LIST_FILES
And
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3021
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3029
Summary: rsync 2.6.6 with acl patch compile fails
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3029
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-24 05:19 ---
Strange, got this error with 2.5.7 when the destination module was read-only.
2.6.6 prints user-friendly info that the module is not writeable.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-24 09:41 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Strange, got this error with 2.5.7 when the destination module was
read-only.
2.6.6 prints user-friendly info that the module is not
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-03 09:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=1412)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1412action=view)
Make special files copyable by non-root
This patch divides what
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-06 06:37 ---
Now when len is OFF_T is it possible that sum-count (which is size_t) in
sum_sizes_sqroot() will rollover too at line:
sum-count = (len + (blength - 1)) /
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-06 11:10 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Did I made a mistake here?
I have some minor quibbles with what you stated (which I will describe below),
but, as you point out, this value
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-06 11:38 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ cat rsync-intoverflowtest.c
#include limits.h
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
unsigned i = UINT_MAX;
printf(i = %u, i+1 = %u\n,
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-07 01:36 ---
Sorry, Wayne you are right 2^32+1 really is 1. :)
Yes 2^60 seems much to big to be practicable today but maybe, to avoid problems
in the future, it would be better to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3076
Summary: Unsuitable error message in flist.c.
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3094
Summary: Signal handling to provide a progress update would be
nice
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
Summary: Please parallelize filesystem scan
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 13:49 ---
Pardon me for being dense, but how could it possibly require a change to the
rsync protocol for the second host in the sequence to pre-scan its filesystem,
so that that
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 16:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=1448)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1448action=view)
One possible way to reorder the checksum computation.
how could it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1448 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-21 09:01 ---
I see rsync 2.6.6 is out. Any chance this made it in?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-21 15:44 ---
No. 2.6.6 was a bug-fix release, and thus wasn't an appropriate time to make
the big changes mentioned in comment #1. If someone would like to work on this,
let me
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116
Summary: large tar files: 1 gig size: retransmitted: rsync_rsh
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3117
Summary: rsyncing a file to a partially downloaded copy is
extremely slow
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-01 04:24 ---
Think I am experiencing the same here.
@szczur: Did it work for you with another version of rsync? Are you using an
stunnel between the machines or anything? Is the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-02 07:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=1464)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1464action=view)
Backtrace and syscall of client+server
This is the backtrace from
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-02 07:14 ---
See attached backtrace. Client+server are hung in a select-syscall. The sync is
currently runnign through an stunnel for security-reasons, but a colleague said
the same
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3147
Summary: message 'copying unsafe symlink' only appears if
verbose=2
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-07 07:57 ---
Think, we observe the same problem here.
I implemented a compilerserver since our compiler is dongled.
Source files (mainly *.c, *.h and *.asm) are synced with the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-10 03:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=1495)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1495action=view)
Simple shellscript for reproducing the bug
This simple script
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-10 16:36 ---
Tried the shell-script here: Creating files, syncing, creating files with other
content, syncing - all fine. Even with 2500 instead of 500 files. Too bad :-(
Any
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 07:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=1498)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1498action=view)
rsync server log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 07:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=1497)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1497action=view)
rsync server configuration
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1495 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 07:19 ---
I tried the same script with our Linux server as rsync server (rsync 2.6.0). In
this constellation, everything is ok. So maybe, I am confronted with a pure
Cygwin
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 09:39 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created an attachment (id=1464)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1464action=view) [edit]
Backtrace and syscall of
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
So maybe, I am confronted with a pure
Cygwin problem that is different from the original bug 2957 that has been
reported on a Linux system.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3159
Summary: VA_COPY() brokenness
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3159
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=1500)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1500action=view)
Use va_copy() macro if defined
I assume that this one-line change
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 12:10 ---
Over here no cygwin is involved. Only rsync over an stunnel using xinetd.
Colleague said he even tried that without stunnel, but with no better success.
I did try the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3159
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-11 12:47 ---
Rsync builds successfully with this modification.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-12 07:55 ---
Seems as using a rsync daemon via TCP solves the problem for me. I have not
encountered any of the afore-mentioned problems so far with it.
Thank you very much for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-12 08:56 ---
It really seems to be a cygwin bug. Sorry for not trying TCP before...
Thanx again
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168
Summary: --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in
2.6.6
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3169
Summary: Dirvish should probably be mentioned on the resources
page
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: All
URL: http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/resources.html
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 11:48 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
--min-size has never been released in a version of rsync except in the patchs
dir. I know that Debian has released several versions with
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3169
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-15 20:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=1516)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1516action=view)
test.log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
Summary: `make test` fails when using xattr patch
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-16 08:31 ---
I saw the CVS checkin comments a couple days ago and just looked at
them---thanks!
(One tiny nit---you might want to mention in the manual that the +1/-1 are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
Summary: old server, new client, unrecognized option problem
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-16 14:00 ---
Michael Cramer proposed this fix:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=70804
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-16 17:28 ---
I see, though what I do not see is how this is sanely possible, and would
consider it a bug in itself. Recall that this happens also when the client is
the only one
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174
Summary: Patch for specifying zlib compression level
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=1517)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1517action=view)
rsync compression level patch
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=1518)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1518action=view)
Transcript of unsuccessful attempts
I have other transcripts with me
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
Summary: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3159
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3117
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2760
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 12:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=1519)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1519action=view)
Allow --link-dest to affects symlinks and devices
I've worked up a
501 - 600 of 3934 matches
Mail list logo
