DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4017] New: rsync 2.6.8: unexpected tag 3 [sender]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 Summary: rsync 2.6.8: unexpected tag 3 [sender] Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3929] after upgrade from 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 --delete is not functional

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-15 05:22 MST --- Thank you for your help. I try your patch on both servers (rsync version 2.6.8) without solution with my problem. When I downgrade rsync to verion 2.6.6 on my client

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4023] New: Rsync does not copy files recursively when using ssh public key authorization and the files-from option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4023 Summary: Rsync does not copy files recursively when using ssh public key authorization and the files-from option Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4023] Rsync does not copy files recursively when using ssh public key authorization and the files-from option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4023 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] New: new option: --filelimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 Summary: new option: --filelimit Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-17 14:59 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2096) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2096action=view) implementation of --filelimit -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4033] New: Get remote disk space

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4033 Summary: Get remote disk space Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-18 19:10 MST --- Rsync already has a slow-down.diff that does something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4023] Rsync does not copy files recursively when using ssh public key authorization and the files-from option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4023 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-18 19:23 MST --- Right, the man page says that -a doesn't imply -r when --files-from is enabled. If you can reproduce the incorrect behavior of recursing even without -r and you have rsync

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4035] New: creates huge file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 Summary: creates huge file Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4035] creates huge file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4037] New: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037 Summary: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4037] Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-20 17:25 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2098) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2098action=view) Script for a backup scenario that tickles the bug -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3825] rsync won't delete directory with excluded files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-25 16:11 MST --- Matt - I finally got around to examining/testing your patch (during summers in Minnesota I have other, higher priority things to do :D). It's a very large patch which goes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3825] rsync won't delete directory with excluded files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-25 17:25 MST --- (In reply to comment #10) Thanks for testing the patch! I would also argue that the message should be emitted regardless of -v options since it indicates that rsync is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3929] after upgrade from 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 --delete is not functional

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-26 11:03 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2106) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2106action=view) Fix the problem with --delete --relative This patch fixes the problem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3929] after upgrade from 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 --delete is not functional

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4056] New: Option to look for fuzzy basis files in --*-dest directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4056 Summary: Option to look for fuzzy basis files in --*-dest directories Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3929] after upgrade from 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 --delete is not functional

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 03:46 MST --- You are right, the 2nd patch resolve my problem. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 10:44 MST --- I can confirm this with the standard Debian version 2.6.7-1 and 2.6.8-2 (no ACL patches). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 10:57 MST --- The patch below will detect the condition where we are inplace, have a destination file that does not exist and an existing reference file. When this happens, the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 11:21 MST --- Hardlinking and then modifying the existing file in the --link-dest directory is absolutely the wrong thing to do IMNSHO, this will break many incremental backup strategies

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 11:59 MST --- Fair comment. I don't feel comfortable digging into rsync to try and optimally copy over the reference file to the destination, however, so I am afraid that at this point I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4080] New: rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 Summary: rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4082] RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 17:20 MST --- I agree that it would be useful if rsync could process files in an order specified by the user. However, I think individual prioritization algorithms are not rsync's job.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4082] RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4082] RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 23:34 MST --- use --max-size for a small-file first pass, and then --min-size for a large-file second pass. And it seems so obvious in retrospect! Thanks. I can envision a wrapper

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3846] rsync silently transfers blocks of zero bytes on read errors

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3846 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 18:18 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2142) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2142action=view) Fix --inplace when basis file doesn't match dest file Here's a patch that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2142 is|0 |1 obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4017] rsync 2.6.8: unexpected tag 3 [sender]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3979] writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3979] writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4001] man page should document --server flag and SSH forced command scenario

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3978] readonly source - incomplete transfers (permission problems)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 20:17 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2144) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2144action=view) Fix to avoid skipping the leading '[' This patch gets rid of the code

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 05:21 MST --- (By the way, on most systems - Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, etc. - you might be able to test IPv6, even without a global IPv6 address, just by loading the module at boot and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3988] -a collides with --flags

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4128] New: ignore-times with link-dest behaves unexpected / sematics not clear

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128 Summary: ignore-times with link-dest behaves unexpected / sematics not clear Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4128] ignore-times with link-dest behaves unexpected / sematics not clear

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 04:44 MST --- Workaround == For those who find this report while searching for a solution: # clean up previous experiment export B=192.168.0.20 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'rm -f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4130] New: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4130 Summary: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4131] New: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4131 Summary: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4132] New: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4132 Summary: Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4130] Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4132] Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4132 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 19:19 MST --- *** Bug 4130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4131] Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4131 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4132] Does not delete partial files upon completion of transfer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4132 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 19:19 MST --- *** Bug 4131 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4132] temp file not removed on siganl (e.g. SIGINT)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4132 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4128] Make --ignore-times work better with --link-dest by adding an after-transfer check

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4128] Make --ignore-times work better with --link-dest by adding an after-transfer check

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 10:47 MST --- Let me comment about the checksum slowness: There is a diff in the patches dir named early-checksum.diff that makes the receiver do its checksumming at the same time that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4128] Make --ignore-times work better with --link-dest by adding an after-transfer check

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 11:30 MST --- (In reply to comment #2) It would be nice if the receiver would notice that it copied 100% of the data from a --link-dest basis file to the destination temp file while

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4138] New: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4139] New: Generator process (running as daemon) hangs after kill SIGINT.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4139 Summary: Generator process (running as daemon) hangs after kill SIGINT. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4139] Generator process (running as daemon) hangs after kill SIGINT.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4139 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 15:21 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2169) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2169action=view) Add exception fd_sets to recevier, generator's select() I originally

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4139] Generator process (running as daemon) hangs after kill SIGINT.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4139 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3594] --delete doesn't delete destination files that don't exist at the source

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3594 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3958] files over 13 caracters are syncronized all the time

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3958 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4080] rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4080] rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-08 16:47 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2178) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2178action=view) Test case for this bug Awesome! You fixed it! Perhaps you'd like a test

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4138] Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3829] rsync loses access ACLs on transferred files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3829 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4157] New: Add RCS keyword $Header$ to all files to support development

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 Summary: Add RCS keyword $Header$ to all files to support development Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4080] rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2957] rsync hangs when client put files to server (checked in 2.6.6 too)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4157] Add RCS keyword $Header$ to all files to support development

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4080] rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2957] rsync hangs when client put files to server (checked in 2.6.6 too)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957 --- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-10 19:33 MST --- Brian: You're getting a syntax error. This bug is about a hang. I'd suggest posting to the mailing list to get help with the command you're running. -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4162] New: Wanted: a mechanism to prevent rsync network compression of compressed files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4162 Summary: Wanted: a mechanism to prevent rsync network compression of compressed files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] New: Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 Summary: Checksum Error using ssh key authentication Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4157] Add RCS keyword $Header$ to all files to support development

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-11 07:15 MST --- Hmm, I'm confused. Not to contest but perhaps fill in more info. A checked out file can normally only be committed if indeed, by definition, the user has intentionally

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3554] Second copy of same rsync daemon should notice pid file and quit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3554 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-11 17:34 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2181) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2181action=view) patch I can reproduce this issue. The described change fixes it: #

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 02:16 MST --- I did try the savetransfer program as you suggest. The first two commands (for the push rsync) are being used. The stream of data are logged in the client side, but none

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #3 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4168] New: Random file has vanished when syncing clock with ntpdate/hwclock ?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168 Summary: Random file has vanished when syncing clock with ntpdate/hwclock ? Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 15:22 MST --- (In reply to comment #3) Is it possible that the rsync provide a special option, which will allow the other options to be transferred like the data form the client to the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4168] Random file has vanished when syncing clock with ntpdate/hwclock ?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-13 03:30 MST --- I have setup a rsync of the same source on two servers just before the sync of the clock by ntpdate/hwclock I have random vanished files and all vanished files wasn't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Silence 'vanished files' messages

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Silence 'vanished files' messages

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-14 19:01 MST --- Andreas, you have a point about the special nature of the file has vanished message. The message seems to be an artifact of rsync's implementation that isn't meaningful at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4163] Checksum Error using ssh key authentication

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-15 11:23 MST --- For completeness sake, I'll also mention that the rrsync script in the support directory is one way to run a forced-command ssh setup without resorting to daemon mode: it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3778] rsync triggers ( pre/post xter scripts )

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3778 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3825] rsync won't delete directory with excluded files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.6.8 |2.6.9 --- Comment #12 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3988] -a collides with --flags

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3824] Max-delete with percentage

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3824 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|2.6.8

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3186] Surprisingly large unshared memory usage

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3271] Rsync instances stay in memory when using in daemon mode

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3492] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3643] Poor performance using manually configured NICs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3210] It would be great to add flags to alllow file date as a filter on what is syncd

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3210 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|2.6.7

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3485] rsync uses more space in destination even with -S specified

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3485 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3945] add arbitrary error reporting (with --error, perhaps)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3945 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-15 16:23 MST --- Created an attachment (id=2185) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2185action=view) deny-rsync script I wrote a quick-and-dirty shell script that speaks

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3945] add arbitrary error reporting (with --error, perhaps)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3945 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #2185 is|0 |1 obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3988] -a collides with --flags

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3988] -a collides with --flags

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-15 17:35 MST --- (In reply to comment #3) rsync: file flags are not supported on this client rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1231) [client=2.6.8] Be sure to run

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >