https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 01:26 ---
I believe that using this no-op packet effectively implements the keep alive
option requested in bug 1889 without requiring an explicit option be given.
Nice.
I'm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 14:12 ---
I may be able to reproduce the original situation.
I can have a browser and X that are running with 90% load on
CPU 1 and 98% load on CPU 2. Once I have waited for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 14:52 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I may be able to reproduce the original situation.
The original situation is a timeout at the end of all transferred data, not in
the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 12:53 ---
I've had rsync problems intermittantly in Gentoo.
Gentoo uses rsync within portage package management system.
Typically users run emerge sync to update their
portage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 16:07 ---
The CVS code now handles the case where the generator is taking too long between
writes -- it either flushes any buffered data in the output buffer after
timeout/2
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 01:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I havn't specified the timeout option, and still get the issue.
I also have double-checked, and reliably suceeed on all the 'straced'
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 07:38 ---
Hmm. I've not managed to make it break. I will try loading the machines
while doing the rsyncs and see if that has any effect.
Well. It seems to have no effect
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 11:10 ---
I'm glad that it was not just a product of my imagination!
For some reason I havn't been able to reliably reproduce the problem. I pretty
much gave up. I am
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 12:20 ---
I havn't specified the timeout option, and still get the issue.
I also have double-checked, and reliably suceeed on all the 'straced' backups so
far this week.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
>
[Bug 1476] Unexplained timout at end of file transfer.
rsync
-- Thread --
-- Date --
Find
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734";
google_alternate_ad_url = "http:/
12 matches
Mail list logo
