You should also read about --inplace. Without it --no-whole-file you
are telling it to do all the extra data diffing only to write out an
entire new file anyway (just using data from source and target to create
it).
On 6/30/23 21:29, Selva Nair via rsync wrote:
So this disable a lot
>
> So this disable a lot of interest in Rsync :-( Isn't there a way to
> disable
> "--whole-file"?
>
"--no-whole-file" should do it though for local copies, forcing delta
transfer is not going to speed up anything in most cases.
Selva
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting
Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote:
> Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 22:43:
> > Are you so sure rsync actually copies the file? It should
> > correct the timestamp and tell you it did.
>
> Of that what it should do! But I'm sure not: the target is a very
> low-quality-and-performance USB key ... less
Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 22:43:
-i, -v, and --progress all only affect the output.
Bonjour, of course I know ;-)
adds a header and footer and --progress of course adds the per-file
progress bar.
Thanks, that what I wanted to know, so I keep them all.
as those 2 options are very
Am 29.06.23 um 22:31 schrieb Stephane Ascoet via rsync:
Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 04:52:
--itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is
Hi, thank you so much! Today I used a little different way of doing it, and
another computer, and the behaviour is the same. It seems
On 6/29/23 16:31, Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote:
Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 04:52:
--itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is
Hi, thank you so much! Today I used a little different way of doing it,
and another computer, and the behaviour is the same. It seems that the
Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 04:52:
--itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is
Hi, thank you so much! Today I used a little different way of doing it, and
another computer, and the behaviour is the same. It seems that the reason is a
different timestamp. So the whole file
--itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is
different. Also, -z is counter-productive when rsync isn't networking.
On 6/28/23 22:28, Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote:
Hi, /media/clec1enextsanstampon/gigamopourcdas4/ contains an old copy of
files of /media/mo. I'm
Hi, /media/clec1enextsanstampon/gigamopourcdas4/ contains an old copy of files
of /media/mo. I'm updating with "cd /media/clec1enextsanstampon/ && rsync
--backup --backup-dir=/media/clec1enextsanstampon/elementssupprimesdepourcdas4/
--del -hPrStvXz --progress /media/mo/