I have a backup server now restoring 6TB of data to a client machine. This has
been going on for four days now, and no sign of getting close to completion.
The connexion is Gb enet end-to-end, and is running at only 40Mb/s. It has far
more capacity than that. The only limiting factor I can s
Thanks, but the whole function of my backup server pivots on rsync features.
Need something rsync-like, but multi-threaded, or with a whole lot less
overhead.
On Tuesday 17 May, 2011 09:18:01 Chris Hawkins wrote:
> I have no idea about potential rsync modifications, but you might try FDT to
>
On Tuesday 17 May, 2011 10:43:21 you wrote:
> Wow! That's a lot of data you're transferring into one server, even with a GB
> pipe you're using, which appears to be using a fraction of it.
Yes, it's my home theater computer with all the movies. I've just set up a
RAID array and need to move my
Ok, you guys' suggestions helped alot.
I changed --compress to --whole-file, and in fact that increased my speed from
4.5Mb/s to 18.5! Much better. Still core-bound though. (not disk, or network)
Now that I've finished my restore, I've run iperf.
Droog --> Hex 937 Mbits/sec!
Merlin --> Hex
