Ish Rattan wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
I need to use binary semaphore instead of counting.
There is a posix implementation?
What about counting semaphore initalized to 1?
I need a semaphore that assumes only values 0 or 1, and never greater than 1.
thanks
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:12:20AM -0500, Ish Rattan wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
I need to use binary semaphore instead of counting.
There is a posix implementation?
What about counting semaphore initalized to 1?
Or mutex.
Anders
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:10:38AM +0100, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
Ish Rattan wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
I need to use binary semaphore instead of counting.
There is a posix implementation?
What about counting semaphore initalized to 1?
I need a
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
I need to use binary semaphore instead of counting.
There is a posix implementation?
What about counting semaphore initalized to 1?
-ishwar
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe rtl | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo unsubscribe rtl
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:12:20AM -0500, Ish Rattan wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Massimiliano Cialdi wrote:
I need to use binary semaphore instead of counting.
There is a posix implementation?
What about counting semaphore initalized to 1?
Or mutex.
-ishwar
-- [rtl] ---
To
