I use lightWindow
http://www.stickmanlabs.com/lightwindow/
Its based on prototype and scriptaculous
__
Alex Duffield ❖ Principal ❖ InControl Solutions . http://
www.incontrolsolutions.com
On 26-Sep-07, at 7:40 AM, k_443
Close, but the other way around. Inline styles have a higher
priority than styles defined in a CSS block (either in page head or
external file).
Element.hide() adds display:none to the element, hiding it, no
matter what its class/style rules might otherwise dictate.
Element.show() removes
Oops,
For some reason I thought that show applied a style. I stand humbly
corrected.
Either way, my initial statement was correct :)
Gareth
On 8/13/07, Tom Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Close, but the other way around. Inline styles have a higher priority than
styles defined in a CSS
its to do with how the various styles are prioritised.
CSS (external files) have a higher priority than inline styles, and the
Show() method, uses inline style, so nothing happens.
You should use inline style on your element if you are planning on unhiding
it.
*Or* load the page with the element
I've run into this problem myself where I thought the P tag would be
containing other elements. I found out what was going on by looking
at the DOM Inspector in Firefox which displayed the element
orientation as it had rendered it, not how I had written it.
On Jul 12, 9:12 am, Rob Wilkerson
Ah, good idea. I was using firebug, but it used my written code.
On 7/12/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've run into this problem myself where I thought the P tag would be
containing other elements. I found out what was going on by looking
at the DOM Inspector in Firefox which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Fuchs wrote:
function hideElements(){
$A(arguments).each(Element.hide);
}
Ugly :))
Let's not forget that $() accepts multiple arguments:
$('e1', 'e2', 'e3').each(Element.hide);
$$() could also be used for that _when_ it will be able
Marius Feraru wrote:
Currently, my preferred way to doing things like this is:
$(qw('e1 e2 e3')).invoke('hide');
(qw is like Perl's string to array sweetener)
Sweet! Is Prototype getting qw() ? I was wishing I had that just a few hours
ago :)
--
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three,
How about?
Script:
function view (obj) {
['basicinfo','canbackground','canposition','canskill'].without(obj).each(Element.hide);
Element.show(obj);
}
And:
ul id=tabnav
li class=tab1a href=# onclick=view('basicinfo')Basic
Info/a/li
li class=tab2a href=#
Michael Peters a écrit :
Sweet! Is Prototype getting qw() ? I was wishing I had that just a
few hours ago :)
It has $w now :-)
--
Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD
[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it. --Mark Twain
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it will work in the same way but be called $w instead (like ruby's %w dito)
It was checked into prototype svn a couple of days ago:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5679
Martin
On 12/6/06, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Feraru wrote:
Currently, my preferred way
See my erlier reply today on how to make your local code work with
multiple arguments. The multiple argument support is removed in the
latest prototype version so you should use this style instead:
['element1', 'element2', 'elemen3'].each(Element.hide);
On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
