Hi Rui,
Firefox 3 implements the W3C Access Control working draft, which gives you
the ability to do XMLHttpRequests to other web sites.
This says it all if you ask me... it's still a working draft and it
isn't wise to develop a fix for something that isn't finished yet and
might change if
Hello,
I am trying to add items for Ajax.Updater using
var params = new Array();
params.groupnumber = group_number;
params.emailaddress = email_address;
etc etc
in place of
var params =
({groupnumber:group_number,emailaddress:email_address,etc});
but get error message from the server saying
Here's some snippet code i use in my script:
target.writeAttribute('class', '').update('');
if(Object.isString(this.opt.className))
target.addClassName(this.opt.className);
then i use the following css rule;
#target.opt_classname { font-size:20px;color:orange }
FF and IE7 shows some nice
geoffcox wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to add items for Ajax.Updater using
var params = new Array();
params.groupnumber = group_number;
params.emailaddress = email_address;
etc etc
in place of
var params =
({groupnumber:group_number,emailaddress:email_address,etc});
...
You need to
You need to use a vanilla object:
var params = {};
Thanks for that help!
Cheers
Geoff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs group.
To post to this group, send email to
We use this, on a page with display preferences. When a preference change
is going to change most of the page, it's just easier to redisplay the whole
thing. Note that page.redirect_to(:back) doesn't work.
render :update { |page| page.redirect_to(request.env[HTTP_REFERER]) }
Regards, Lori
On
spend my whole day now on the following problem and can`t nail it
down. i have to anchors :
%= link_to_remote(,
{:url = { :controller = filter, :action =
male_users_selection }}, {:id = maleSelection}) %
%= link_to_remote(,
{:url = { :controller
=
Mon-03-31-2008, 11:04pm U.S.EDT
Hello,
I'm trying to get a website entry page to work properly, while
learning Scriptaculous effects and javascript at the same time. I
wanted to use a couple of effects to add a little flash-style
animation. I
On Mar 31, 7:32 pm, Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's some snippet code i use in my script:
target.writeAttribute('class', '').update('');
I expect it is because you are not adding Prototype.js's extra methods
to the object that is target. Presumably it is a DOM object, so
before the
i think you can put the onload function in the head element and
that'll get rid of the flicker problem
i.e. instead of this in the body
script
window.onload = function()
{
new Effect.Appear('entryimage',{duration: 4.0, from: 0.0, to: 1.0})
}
/script
you can do
head onload=new
err what am i saying
i mean put the onload on the body element
dancing with the stars is distracting
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:28 PM, David Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think you can put the onload function in the head element and
that'll get rid of the flicker problem
i.e. instead of
11 matches
Mail list logo
