new to using these in place editors, so please forgive my ignorance
I'm making use of InPlaceCollectionEditor, but it does not selected
the correct element.
I'm using the array of arrays, as in... [[1,'option 1'], [2, 'option
2']]
but the first option is always selected.
I tried using the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Koch a écrit :
But, I read in the Proto/Script book that the 'value' option is
deprecated - so I'm thinking there must be a better way.
Yes, I do say on p369 that the option has been deprecated, as it makes
no sense (and I explain why). However, it's still
Hello,
I'd like to disable the highlight effect on text that's embedded in
the inPlaceEditor. I've seen other posts on this idea where they've
suggested modifiying the control.js code. To that end I've found this
bit in control.js..
onLeaveHover: function(ipe) {
about using transparent?
http://webdesign.about.com/od/styleproperties/p/blspbgcolor.htm
On Jan 15, 2008 2:49 PM, Andy Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to disable the highlight effect on text that's embedded in
the inPlaceEditor. I've seen other posts on this idea where
Hello,
I'm wondering if there is a best-practice method for using checkbox
items for the IPE or IPCE?
It seems like IPCE would be a better fit for this type of
functionality.
Currently I'm doing this...
onFormCustomization:function(ipe, ipeForm){
ipeForm.innerHTML = 'labelinput
I've got an RJS response return content with form tags, I can see
the form tags in the response from the server. But the
Element.update() is removing them.
Is this a new feature? Any way to disable this behavoir?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
was doing it because I wasn't thinking clearly you are trying to do it
on purpose... why?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Andy Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, that is what I want to do
unfortunately Prototype is getting in the way... g...
On Feb 12, 1:02 pm, Brian Williams [EMAIL
yes, that is what I did, more or less
replaced the inner form tags with div tags and rewrote my JS with some
DOM trickery to acheive the same result
thanks guys
On Feb 12, 2:14 pm, Justin Perkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You cannot have a form in a form, you're probably doing a
at 3:50 PM, Andy Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an RJS response return content with form tags, I can see
the form tags in the response from the server. But the
Element.update() is removing them.
Is this a new feature? Any way to disable this behavoir
I'm having the same problem, the enumerable methods are not working.
on WinXP
The issue occurrs on both FF3b4 and FF2.x, even after removing FF3b -
still occurrs on FF2 -
checked this on a Mac that's never had FF3b installed - and code works
as expected
going to try to remove and re-install
ok, that worked
on Winxp, removed FF (all versions)
then in Doc/Setting - App data - Mozilla - delete Firefox folder
course now I need to re-install all add-ons
wonder if maybe this is a firebug issue and not a firefox...
On Mar 25, 2:03 pm, Andy Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having
OK,
I suspect this is probably a Firebug issue, when running code in FF3
without any Firebug then there is no problem.
Run code in FF2 with Firebug, no problem.
Run code in FF3 with Firebug beta installed, big problems.
On Mar 25, 2:09 pm, Andy Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, that worked
I think this is a Firebug issue, I had the firebug beta installed on
FF3
after purging and reinstalling I installed only the stable Firebug in
FF2,
when installing FF3 it states that Firebug is not compatible with FF3,
without the firebug beta installed then enumerable methods work as
expected
My experience with FireFox3 with an AJAX exclusive web app was the
Proto/Script worked ok, but FireBug was not ready. That was maybe 2
months ago so FireBug might be game-day ready now.
On Jun 1, 2:41 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marty -
Did you download a nightly and try it?
14 matches
Mail list logo
