Am 08.10.2006 um 00:44 schrieb Michael:
And the Ajax.Update() thing should be pseudo code. Sorry for the lack
of clarity. It should be the scriptaculous function Ajax.Updater(),
see:
http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/Ajax.Updater
Just for clarification, Ajax.Updater is
The single = sign: oops, sorry - you're quite right. Should one of the
following:
if (ajaxSupport == true) {}
if (ajaxSupport) {}
if (Ajax.getTransport()) {}
And the Ajax.Update() thing should be pseudo code. Sorry for the lack
of clarity. It should be the scriptaculous
Michael a écrit :
var ajaxSupport = (Ajax.getTransport()) ? true : false;
a.k.a. var ajaxSupport = !!Ajax.getTransport();
if (ajaxSupport = true) {
Ahem. With a single = sign, you'll reassign ajaxSupport, and therefore
ensure it's true. Beware! This is why I always put rvalues on the
Hello Tobie,
Tobie Langel a écrit :
Your website might get banned by Google:
http://ma.gnolia.com/people/tobie/bookmarks/scoscuste
This is wonderful FUD. I see nothing whatsoever on the Google
guidelines referred to by this article, that says anything about
banning. Especially since
