RE: [rules-users] How to get value of global variable from one rule toanother

I believe globals are to be used in the RHS of a rule and not the LHS which uses normal facts. I would suggest rule AmountsAreNotNull asserts new objects that activate rule CompareValue or something similar. Saving variables between rules should be accomplished using logically asserted facts.

Re: [rules-users] How to get value of global variable from one rule to another

Globals are intended to provide a way to pass values in and out of the engine. Not for reasoning and exchange of values between rules. Values that are changed by rules and are reasoned over are clearly facts of your domain and should be modeled as such. []s Edson 2007/6/14, Alexander

[rules-users] Running on z/OS...

Is anyone running DROOLS on z/OS on a mainframe?! Any reason why it would NOT run on it?! James -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Running-on-z-OS...-tf3922593.html#a11122860 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [rules-users] Running on z/OS...

no reason that I'm aware of, as long as you are running on a compliant jvm. Mark jdepaul wrote: Is anyone running DROOLS on z/OS on a mainframe?! Any reason why it would NOT run on it?! James ___ rules-users mailing list

[rules-users] org.drools.base.dataproviders.MVELDataProvider not Serializable

When trying to serialize a Package I get the message that org.drools.base.dataproviders.MVELDataProvider is not serializable. I only get this problem when I have the from word inmy rules. Looking at the code is does seem that this class is not serializable, and also one of its including

Re: [rules-users] Running on z/OS...

Mark Proctor wrote: ...as long as you are running on a compliant jvm. The z/OS 1.8 has a 64Bit Java 1.5, but due to older applications there is also older Java 1.4.2 and 1.3.2 - so how does that sound?! Hopefully there is no need for anything higher than 1.5 at this point. -- View this

Re: [rules-users] org.drools.base.dataproviders.MVELDataProvider not Serializable

oops, I'll open a jira for this and fix in 4.0 now. Mark bentins wrote: When trying to serialize a Package I get the message that org.drools.base.dataproviders.MVELDataProvider is not serializable. I only get this problem when I have the from word inmy rules. Looking at the code is does seem

[rules-users] Drools v3 to v4 Upgrade Tool

All, For those asking about an upgrade tool, I just posted a quick message about it. http://markproctor.blogspot.com/2007/06/drools-v3to4-update-tool-edson-tirelli.html Regards, Edson -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000

[rules-users] Synchronization of Working Memory

Hello! We found a problem with the interaction of a serialized working memory and updates to the rules. Our process involves serializing the working memory to a database. Later, when we load the serialized version of the working memory back from the database, if we've updated the rules it

Re: [rules-users] Is Rules 4 different from rules 3?

Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply. This is important for me since Seam 1.3.0 is bundled with Rules 4. So that means I have to find a way to migrate the source. Thanks in advance. On 6/14/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, as we state in the wiki we will do documentation once all the