[rules-users] Re: Rule is firing on those objects for which that hasalready fired

I need to write some rule which will *only* fire on newly inserted data points in Working Memory. Does Drools support any such feature which will help me to achieve this ? Any suggestion, how can I achieve this efficiently? I am inserting 6 matching DataObjects into Working Memory. Rule is

Re: [rules-users] logging

May be you could store the names of every fired rule in a global by putting drools.getRule().getName() into a list on the RHS. Then you could get all rules in your package ( pkg.getRules() ) into another list and diff both collections (another_list.removeAll(list) ). Thalupula Ravi wrote: Hi,

Re: [rules-users] Different working memories/rulebases for different application issues?

Hi Thomas, We're doing that in our project (we have different set of rules for different internal processes), and we have one rule base and every time we want to run the engine we execute: statefulSession.startProcess(rule.flow.id); statefulSession.clearAgenda();

Re: [rules-users] Running Drools 4 examples

Ron Kneusel wrote: Greetings! I am attempting to run the HelloWorld example for Drools 4. I have Eclipse 3.3 setup on Windows with the Drools plugin. I have created a project with the Drools examples and added all the Drools .jar files to the project. Everything compiles. When I initially

[rules-users] access to in working memory generated objects

Hi, I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java object. The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt. but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engine that it has generated a new object (Warning)? And how the GUI or any other java

Re: [rules-users] logging

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jaroslaw Kijanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May be you could store the names of every fired rule in a global by putting drools.getRule().getName() into a list on the RHS. Then you could get all rules in your package ( pkg.getRules() ) into another list and

[rules-users] Re: access to in working memory generated objects

I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java object. The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt. but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engine that it has generated a new object (Warning)? And how the GUI or any other java

Re: [rules-users] How to validate boolean values..using Drools

Thanks Alexander. There was a question about Timestamp in my table. Condtion is : compare to start_timestamp can not be less than or equal Current Date. i am trying to like this , EmployeEx(eval(startTimestamp.after(new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis() In This case No Rules to

Re: [rules-users] Re: access to in working memory generated objects

Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Alexander Claus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java object. The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt. but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engine

Re: [rules-users] Re: access to in working memory generated objects

Hi, it may also help to have a look at the PetStore example. Alexander Claus wrote: I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java object. The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt. but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule

[rules-users] Re: How to validate boolean values..using Drools

There was a question about Timestamp in my table. Condtion is : compare to start_timestamp can not be less than or equal Current Date. i am trying to like this , EmployeEx(eval(startTimestamp.after(new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis() In This case No Rules to fired.Please review this

Re: [rules-users] RuleFlow Groups and retraction

it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i do a retract in the rule The activation should have been removed from the ruleflow group. I just tested this with a small example and I do not seem to be able to reproduce this error, the retracted object seems to have

Re: [rules-users] RuleFlow Groups and retraction

i'll try to make a simple example and send it, currently i found a dirty hack. Cheers Markus On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Kris Verlaenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i do a retract in the rule The activation should have been

[rules-users] Re: [rules-dev] Rule is firing on those objects for which that has already fired

Do not spam both user and dev mailing lists. This is a user question, contain it there. Details on how to better use the mailing lists are here http://labs.jboss.org/drools/lists.html Mark siddhartha banik wrote: Hi All, I am using Drools Stateful session with serialized Rule Base Working

[rules-users] LHS reuse?

I have a set of rules that /all/ contain the following condition... positionQuantityAllocatedToLegs : Integer(intValue position.quantity) from accumulate( StrategyLeg(priority 1, instrument == equity, longShort ==

[rules-users] Is there a way to preventing the Agenda to not match against ALL rules when inserting a fact object

Hi, I am migrating one of my projects to using the drools rule-flow. I have a bunch of RuleFlowGroups and just 1 fact object (where I am iterating over an external list and hence I execute the RuleFlow tens of thousands times, inserting a new fact object for each element in my list). Each