Dear Sir,
I am new to Drools and I wonder if any of the classic declarative
problems, such as, nqueens, puzzle16 were implemented in Drools by
anyone. I realize that might be hard because of the bottom-up
evaluation.
Regards,
Paul Fodor
___
rules
Dear Sir,
I am new to Drools and I wonder if anyone used WordNet from Drools.
Basically, I want to make some simple joins, such as, find words that
are in the same synset, all hypernyms of a word, hyponyms, meronyms of
verbs, adjectives, etc.
Regards,
Paul Fodor
with attributes source and target?
rule reachDirect
when
exists( Edge(X,Y) )
then
insertLogical( new Reach(X,Y) );
end
rule reachIndirect
when
exists( Edge(X,Z) )
exists( Reach(Z,Y) )
then
insertLogical( new Reach(X,Y) );
end
Regards,
Paul Fodor
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Paul Fodor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sir,
I am new to Drools and I want to ask how can I implement the classical
transitive closure in Drools. For instance we have a bunch of facts
edge/2 and the transitive closure:
reach(X,Y):- edge(X,Y).
reach(X,Y
Even if the package says org.drools.examples, these files are not in
the Drools examples. I am just using that package to write these files
into while testing in Eclipse.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Paul Fodor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Paul Fodor [EMAIL
() {
return source;
}
public void setTarget(String target) {
this.target = target;
}
public String getTarget() {
return target;
}
}
}
Please tell me if you have any idea.
Thanks,
Paul Fodor
for Drools).
Regards,
Paul Fodor
WordNetInterface_rules.drl:
package drools
import drools.WordNetInterface.S;
import drools.WordNetInterface.G;
import drools.WordNetInterface.Hyp;
import drools.WordNetInterface.Mm;
import drools.WordNetInterface.Ent;
import drools.WordNetInterface.Sim;
import
attached all the sources used in these tests in the email. This example is
locally stratified. I am using the latest released version of Drools.
Regards,
Paul Fodor
win.drl:
package tests;
import tests.Test.Win;
import tests.Test.Move;
rule direct
when
m : Move(x : first, y : second
by calling either of these methods on your
RuleBaseConfiguration:
setProperty(drools.conflictResolver, resolver class name)
or
setConflictResolver(an instance of ConflictResolver)
--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com
Subject
(- ?endtime_cpu ?starttime_cpu))
(printout output computing cputime: ?cputime crlf)
(printout output computing walltime: ?walltime crlf)
(close output)
Regards,
Paul Fodor.
2009/4/16 Edson Tirelli tire...@post.com
Ha, thanks a lot Greg. I need new glasses... he is actually comparing
in the reasoning algorithm, the answer is
correct.
Please explain further if I am missing anything.
Edson
2009/4/17 Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com
Hi Edson, Greg,
I don't think the rule is written wrong. This is how the win-nowin program
is written in logic programming: X wins
want.
Regards,
Paul Fodor
Must Be
1)Free or inexpensive product.
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10 data
fields.)
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.
Better if we have.
1)Change Rules
algorithm, the answer is
correct.
Please explain further if I am missing anything.
Edson
2009/4/17 Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com
Hi Edson, Greg,
I don't think the rule is written wrong. This is how the win-nowin
program is written in logic programming: X wins if there is a move from X
I looked in the manual and I think this was your intended behaviour for
insertLogical (your approach to the best it can be done). I think it's fine.
Not many programs are non locally stratified, so this is definitely good
enough.
Paul.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Paul Fodor paul.i.fo
particular task differs a lot on various rule systems.
Regards,
Paul.
Cheers,
Edson
2009/4/17 Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com
Hi Edson,
The insertLogical doesn't work for non-stratified programs.
For instance, in the win-nowin example, if there is a move(1,2) and
a move(2,1
. For each feature that we tested, we
tried our best to represent it in the best way for every given system. We
are always open to sugestions of other banchmarks to test.
Regards,
Paul
Just my .02c
Edson
2009/4/17 Paul Fodor paul.i.fo...@gmail.com
Now, I am curious. What
16 matches
Mail list logo
