that `anonymous struct` will never be added to Rust language?
Thanks,
Changchun
-- --
??: Nick Cameronli...@ncameron.org
: 2014??7??12??(??) 12:34
??: ??changchun@qq.com;
: rust-devrust-dev@mozilla.org;
: Re: [rust-dev
Cameronli...@ncameron.org
*发送时间:* 2014年7月12日(星期六) 中午12:34
*收件人:* 范长春changchun@qq.com;
*抄送:* rust-devrust-dev@mozilla.org;
*主题:* Re: [rust-dev] initialization syntax
The short answer is so that struct initialisation, struct types, and
struct de-structuring all have the same syntax.
For more
Hi Rust designers,
I'm curious why rust uses colon : instead of assignment = when initialize
an object. What is the rationale behind this?
From what I see, `Point { x = 2, y = 3 }` looks much better than `Point { x :
2, y : 3}`.
Since most of the syntax rules are consistent in rust, why we
Because of JavaScript, basically.
Patrick
On July 11, 2014 9:21:20 PM PDT, 范长春 changchun@qq.com wrote:
Hi Rust designers,
I'm curious why rust uses colon : instead of assignment = when
initialize an object. What is the rationale behind this?
From what I see, `Point { x = 2, y = 3 }`
The short answer is so that struct initialisation, struct types, and struct
de-structuring all have the same syntax.
For more detail, see the discussion in this (rejected and closed) RFC for
changing from using `:` to `=`.
Cheers, Nick
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:21 PM, 范长春 changchun@qq.com
Hi,
I was just thinking about that again, and I wonder if that could be used
to create a pattern for initialization literals for collections.
Once we have yield fn there could be syntax that converts
initialization code into a generator that is passed to a function call:
let mut l =
Could a macro work just as well here?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Armin Ronacher armin.ronac...@active-4.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was just thinking about that again, and I wonder if that could be used
to create a pattern for initialization literals for collections.
Once we have yield fn
