[X] Yes, I want graphical user interfaces that make use of the graphical
abilities and I want Sage to be superior to Mathematica (especially for
expert users)
Franco
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 6:17:41 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 10:53:04 AM UTC+2, Nicolas M.
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:44:00PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Very much like for Parent, there probably are things that are in
CategoryObject for very old legacy reasons (typically pre-categories!)
and really do not belong there; this could typically be the case for
generators and
Hi!
On 2015-05-05, David Roe roed.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Parent should represent an object in a category that has a forgetful
functor to sets; CategoryObject an object in an arbitrary category. I have
no objection to moving the generator and name code to Parent.
Perhaps not the name code (if
Hi!
On 2014-03-11, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Aaron Lauve and Peter Tingley are planning to host Sage Days in Chicago
during the
summer of 2015 (not 2014!!). This will focus on representation theory,
crystals,
and combinatorics.
When does it take place?
Best regards,
[X] Yes, I want graphical user interfaces that make use of the graphical
abilities
Despite the obvious bias in the question, I'm for it as the default in the
notebook.
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon egourgoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Le mardi 5 mai 2015 12:44:08 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit :
IMHO, they do not belong either to parents. A set has generators?
sage: Partitions(5).gens_dict()
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
Hello,
While using patchbot client I do have *a lot* of http errors 502 (proxy
error) or 503 (service unavailable). It happens on startup (while
getting the list of trusted authors) or when transmitting report.
Could somebody with access to the patchbot server could check the
configurations as
On 5/5/15, 6:36 AM, Simon King wrote:
Hi!
On 2014-03-11, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Aaron Lauve and Peter Tingley are planning to host Sage Days in Chicago
during the
summer of 2015 (not 2014!!). This will focus on representation theory,
crystals,
and combinatorics.
[X ] Yes, I want graphical user interfaces that make use of the graphical
abilities
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 09:54:15AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote:
Since the last poll about graphics was immediately derailed by
unrelated command line questions, let me try once more: Should selected
objects display graphical visualizations when it can be done
unobtrusively? We all
Parent should represent an object in a category that has a forgetful
functor to sets; CategoryObject an object in an arbitrary category. I have
no objection to moving the generator and name code to Parent.
David
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:41:42AM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
what are the types CategoryObject and Parent supposed to represent? For
example, I don't understand why generators and names are dealt with on the
level of CategoryObject but constructing elements is dealt with on the level
of
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:24:17AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
From what I've been told, we have _an_element_ inorder for an_element
to do some caching, but with the advancements of our cached_method
decorators, this shouldn't be necessary. IIRC, we are moving/have moved
away
Hello,
what are the types CategoryObject and Parent supposed to represent? For
example, I don't understand why generators and names are dealt with on
the level of CategoryObject but constructing elements is dealt with on
the level of Parent.
In fact, in all of Sage, there is only a single
I've gone through and made the edge handling with respect to labels more
explicit which also fixes the problem listed above. The trac ticket can be
found at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18366
--Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Salut Vincent!
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:39:27AM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
On 20/04/15 04:54, David Roe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree, coercion G - M is probably the right thing to do here.
+1
Thanks for your
On 2015-05-05 11:48, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Though note that doing equality up to coercion has drawbacks; in
particular since it can easily break Python's specification that two
equal objects shall have the same hash.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/EqualityCoercion
I'm sure we are
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 10:53:04 AM UTC+2, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
The only caveat I could see is if this would noticeably slow down the
output [1]. If that's not the case, +1.
The picture is only generated if the graph has 20 vertices precisely to
avoid long delays.
Do you mind
Hi,
Le mardi 5 mai 2015 12:44:08 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit :
IMHO, they do not belong either to parents. A set has generators?
sage: Partitions(5).gens_dict()
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AttributeError: 'StandardPermutations_n_with_category' object
has no attribute
On 05/05/15 11:00, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:41:42AM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
what are the types CategoryObject and Parent supposed to represent? For
example, I don't understand why generators and names are dealt with on the
level of CategoryObject but
20 matches
Mail list logo
