[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-07-19 Thread Ralf Stephan
Paul, please open a ticket and Cc: me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Git repository should have Sage versions as branches not tags

2016-07-19 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I was running a small script on trac.sagemath.org:12000 that was listening for github pull requests and comments (via github webhooks) and publishing them to trac (via the trac scripts shipped with Sage). Nothing too fancy, but I can't find the code for it at the moment (but it's probably still

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Just FYI - Tom Roby and I ran into this problem today trying to get 7.3.beta8 to build on OS X 10.9. So a fix before 7.3 is released would be good and appreciated. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-07-19 Thread Paul Masson
Ralf, I'm finally getting ready to add/standardize LaTeX names for special functions. I wanted to start with elliptic integrals but see that latex_name or _print_latex_ are already defined for all of them. The LaTeX formatting shows at the command line but does not get rendered in notebooks or

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread leif
chris wuthrich wrote: > > Thanks a lot, leif, for the help. > > I will ask the sysadmin to update binutils. Well, in this case Sage built and used its own GCC (currently 4.9.3) because at least /the default one/ on your system is outdated as well. You may ask the sysadmin whether already a

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 5:35:55 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: > > Huh, dead old toolchain on a recent Intel machine. > Centos/Redhat 6 is from 2010 and supported until 2020... If you want to get good performance for recent hardware you'd need something fresher, of course. -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: Did trac server change its rsa keys?

2016-07-19 Thread Volker Braun
The key changed with the recent reinstall On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 3:47:26 PM UTC+2, mmarco wrote: > > Trying to `git trac push` I get the following error message. Is it > expected or someone is trying to MITM me? > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread chris wuthrich
Thanks a lot, leif, for the help. I will ask the sysadmin to update binutils. Your idea with SAGE_FAT_BINARY seems to get around the problem, by now. If it still helps for #20779: sageadm@pmlapsag01:~/sage$ as --version GNU assembler version 2.20.51.0.2-5.44.el6 20100205 Copyright 2009 Free

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread leif
leif wrote: > leif wrote: >> chris wuthrich wrote: >>> >>> Trying to compile sage 7.3.beta8 on CentOS6.8, I ran into a problem >>> compiling ntl 9.8.1. >>> >>> Not sure what to include. Just ask. > > You may give us the output of 'as --version'. P.P.S.: Maybe $ head -25 /proc/cpuinfo and

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread leif
leif wrote: > chris wuthrich wrote: >> >> Trying to compile sage 7.3.beta8 on CentOS6.8, I ran into a problem >> compiling ntl 9.8.1. >> >> Not sure what to include. Just ask. You may give us the output of 'as --version'. > Huh, dead old toolchain on a recent Intel machine. > > Update binutils

[sage-devel] Re: error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread leif
chris wuthrich wrote: > > Trying to compile sage 7.3.beta8 on CentOS6.8, I ran into a problem > compiling ntl 9.8.1. > > Not sure what to include. Just ask. Huh, dead old toolchain on a recent Intel machine. Update binutils (which include the GNU assember), or disable '-march=native' in NTL.

Re: [sage-devel] Did trac server change its rsa keys?

2016-07-19 Thread John Cremona
Surely this means exactly what it says, since the IP address of trac really has changed. John On 19 July 2016 at 14:47, mmarco wrote: > Trying to `git trac push` I get the following error message. Is it expected > or someone is trying to MITM me? > > Traceback (most recent

[sage-devel] Did trac server change its rsa keys?

2016-07-19 Thread mmarco
Trying to `git trac push` I get the following error message. Is it expected or someone is trying to MITM me? Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mmarco/git-trac-command/bin/git-trac", line 18, in cmdline.launch() File "/home/mmarco/git-trac-command/git_trac/cmdline.py", line

[sage-devel] error compiling ntl in sage 7.3.beta8

2016-07-19 Thread chris wuthrich
Trying to compile sage 7.3.beta8 on CentOS6.8, I ran into a problem compiling ntl 9.8.1. Not sure what to include. Just ask. Chris Host system: Linux pmlapsag01 2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 31 21:57:07 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux