On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
In the category of glue code I meant
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
Cython is just a py(x) to C compiler. The problem
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:27, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
But yes
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
But considering that we might one day want to make part of the Sage
library possible to install into your system Python distribution
(right?), it might be a good idea
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:20 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, my RSS feed is broken for sage-devel so I didn't see that this
thread had had lots of horrible things patchbot can do :)
On a related note, an option to have patchbot only test files actually
changed in the patches
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
Well, considering among other things the recent discussions about
licensing, I don't think that it's going to be possible to have a single
top-level repository for all
Yeah, it has to do with how Pynac and Sage recursively call each
other. Certainly a blocker in my book, and it looks like it's been
around a while (possibly since the introduction of Pynac, at least
since we were able to simplify SR(4)^(1/2)). I hope to have a patch up
soon.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual intervention is required. Or was there
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 1:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/15/12 12:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
You correctly interpreted my response, and I agree with your conclusions. I
haven't
Thanks for trying it out.
If sandpile.py *always* times out on you rmachine, this is the
expected behavior. I think at this point manual intervention is
required. Or was there something else you were thinking it should do
(because clearly you were surprised, which isn't the intent).
- Robert
On
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:33 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:39:32 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point, but I can go back and
It's easy.
1) Download and build a pristine copy of Sage for testing.
2) Apply http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12486 to the
sage-scripts directory.
3) Run sage --patchbot
Everyone's results will be consolidated at
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ . Hopefully this will allow us to get
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:55 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 4:27 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
It's easy.
1) Download and build a pristine copy of Sage for testing.
2) Applyhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12486to the
sage-scripts
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:17 PM, D. S. McNeil dsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
It's easy.
1) Download and build a pristine copy of Sage for testing.
2) Apply http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12486
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/9/12 9:44 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 23:30, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
I use separate directories in devel/ to have multiple versions of the new
sage notebook
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A couple of simple developer questions. Sorry...
(1) I uploaded a new patch of the same name with the previous patch, but the
patchbot doesn't seem to be triggered. I already tried ?kick, with no
help. Is there other
When in question, look at the logs. If you see Killed that means
that the subprocess doing the patching/building/testing was killed.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, I just noticed that many of the patches with positive reviews have
the red swirling
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:13 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A couple of simple developer questions. Sorry...
(1) I
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
A personal anecdote: I've used sage for about 4 years, but only started
contributing in the last couple of months because the development process
looks scary to an outsider.
When I started, at every step of the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:00 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 02/ 8/12 09:41 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le mardi 7/2/2012, David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net a écrit :
Unfortunately, from a developers
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:11 AM, javier vengor...@gmail.com wrote:
How about testig for the desired mathematical properties? If this is a
Gram-Schmidt test, the resulting matrix M should be orthogonal, so we
can test for M*M.transpose() being the identity matrix (up to
numerical accuracy). Of
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William,
On 7 Feb., 20:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
It's important (in fact, critical) that the trac ticket number is
clearly
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/7/12 2:46 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/7/12 2:16 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 PM, William
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:17 AM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 1:16 pm, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 02/02/2012 23:22, Jonathan Bober a crit :
Can you think of a reason that the answer should change? Does maxima use
less that 53 bits of precision ever?
Well,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:05 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012 5:12 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I wondered why we still had .py files in our library. Some time ago
this made sense as there were Python features that were not
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
= Forewords =
I investigated the numerical issues on my ARM build, and after much poking
around and searching, I found that I was chasing the dahu : the tests were
wrong, and the result were
Done. Now if only I could figure out why the doctests keep crashing...
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
How about setting ulimit -c 0 (coredumpsize) for the patch bot?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
I would like to propose the addition of a matrix literal syntax, namely
sage: [1, 2; 3, 4]
[1 2]
[3 4]
sage: [1, 2; 3, 4] * [5, 6; 7, 8]
[19 22]
[43 50]
Currently one must write
sage: matrix([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
[1 2]
[3 4]
sage: matrix([[1, 2], [3, 4]]) * matrix([[5, 6], [7, 8]])
[19 22]
[43 50]
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Marco Streng marco.str...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/26 Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com:
No, that's not good.
Cause this syntax forbids 1-row matrices to be entered in this format
(as it won't be possible to distinguish it from a list!)
How about [1,2,3;] for
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:16 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 02:06 -0800, David Roe wrote:
As for global defaults, it's nice for both examples and debugging for
there to be as little global state as possible, and someone who wants
RDF for reals probably wants
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:51 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
[...lots of axiom examples and Sage questions...]
Sage, like Axiom, distinguishes between Integers and Rationals with a
trivial denominator, has a strong notion of a basering (for matrices,
polynomials), etc. You may want to
To get a quick sense of what people think about this, I've decided to
rephrase this as a survey. To be clear, though this coincides with
Matlab syntax, the intent is not to try to make Sage a Matlab clone,
rather it is to add a missing feature to Sage.
Should [a, b; c, d] be a valid syntax for
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/26/12 1:57 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
It would be nice to be able to specify a type. Perhaps
R.[1,2,3;2,3,4] - Matrix(R,[[1,2,3],[2,3,4]])
or perhaps even
R[1,2,3;2,3,4]
Another option would be:
[QQ:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 01/26/12 16:36, William Stein wrote:
Why *not* use it?
The standard argument against preparser stuff like this is that you
have to be careful to not use it when writing .py code for the Sage
core library.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
wrote:
On 01/26/12 16:36, William Stein wrote:
Why
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:14:36 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
[1] If you're using Chrome, check out
http://www.chromeexperiments.com/webgl
Unless you use Linux, where chrome doesn't support webgl despite what the
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:15 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Another issue: do we allow [1..10; 10..20]?
We probably shouldn't go to extra effort to support it.
I can't seem to construct
matrices with matrix entries (this is not absurd) -- but should the
preparser grok it?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:15 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Another issue: do we allow [1..10; 10..20]?
We probably shouldn't go to extra effort to support it.
I can't seem to construct
matrices with
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/24/12 11:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
There will be = 1 bug days. Fractional numbers are fine.
I thought last time we had this discussion (for 35.5), the conclusion was to
just have integer Sage Days, and
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:48:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote:
Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a �crit :
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Dima Pasechnikdim...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again, let me bring up
In general we would like to avoid writing doctests that are large only
to take a measurable amount of time, but you could look into using
cputime() with the first invocation and then making sure the second
call is 0.0x * (first call time).
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Michael Orlitzky
My original intent with respect to caching was that the parents would
be the root objects, and everything else would be lazily referenced
except through them, but just pushing things through was a large
enough task that I never got this done. In particular, what I was
thinking is that a coercion
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Robert
On 17 Jan., 22:10, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
In particular, what I was
thinking is that a coercion or action involving R and S would have a
lifetime of min(lifetime(R), lifetime(S
It pains me a bit to say yes, but I agree with your assessment of the
situation; it's needed only by the few (and the technically capable)
and is a lot of weight for something that looks to always be an
incomplete hack around not having OpenSSL on the system. Just make
sure that it's clearly
On Jan 12, 2012 7:43 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/12/12 3:20 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
It pains me a bit to say yes, but I agree with your assessment of the
situation; it's needed only by the few (and the technically capable)
and is a lot of weight for something
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
How about the following implementation: If the return values is
weakref-able, we store a weakref. Otherwise, we just store the object. Upon
lookup, if the value is a weakref it is dereferenced.
I now understand that
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:16 PM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
Maxima compiles code to binary, and has done so, oh for a couple of
decades.
Since Maxima is part of Sage, one might hope that William would be
aware of this feature.
In the spirit of being mutually informative, here's how it's
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:36 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:50 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
The coercion graph in Sage is supposed to be transitive. This
assumption is explicit in the documentation of sage.structure.coerce
for example. But
Yep.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit unclear on what the value of patchlevel should be in my new
PIL package. I carry over the two patches from pil-1.1.6.p4, but it's
a new PIL version, so I'm thinking pil-1.1.7.p0. Would that be
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2011-11-09 06:58, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Any ideas?
Did you set ulimit?
Nope.
I constantly build/test sage on sage.math.washington.edu and never saw
this.
That's what I figured.
So I guess it is something
I recently upgraded the patchbot to build against the latest release,
and I'm still having trouble getting all doctests to pass. A patchbot
where every ticket is some tests failed (even if it's just 2 or 3)
is *much* less useful than one that consistently can run all tests.
See, e.g.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:38 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
wrote:
Hello all,
Simon King has a big patch at #11900 to speed-up categories. There were
some regressions at #9138, this patch fixes all of these
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 25 Okt., 12:04, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2011-10-25 09:51, Dan Drake wrote:
I think that would be a good idea, although if
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 25 Okt., 12:04, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:26 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 24 Sep., 18:25, D. S. McNeil dsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Leif wrote:
Any reasonable compiler does constant folding and loop-invariant code
motion; even Python's byte-code compiler should do that.
Almost none is done. Only
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
PS:
On 24 Sep., 23:22, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Or would it already be faster to keep Finder (which is cdef'd) as it
is, and call Finder.which_root as a method?
I tried, and the total computation
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:05 AM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Hi
One of the nice aspects of cython is that you can cython -a a file
and see what could use optimization.
If I import a .pyx file into Sage, Sage compiles it into cython. Is
there a way to make it show the same
The latest release seems to be flakey w.r.t. running lots of doctests,
e.g. for a plain vanilla install we have
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/ I don't have any idea why,
perhaps http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11337 will help
some, perhaps it'll just fix itself in the next
See
http://hg.sagemath.org/scripts-main/file/26abf552ceaa/sage-cython#l1
Specifically, you can do sage -cython -a -sage /path/to/file.[s]pyx
and it should do what you want.
- Robert
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:53 AM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
FWIW it looks like this is a trac
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:41 AM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
is 4^(-2) (use various kinds of integers) integer rational float?
ditto for
5^(-2) ?
Seems to me that the presence of python integers is an inconsistency
waiting to appear, and
the only proper use of python ints is as a sage
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
During the coding sprints taking place at ECC2011 summer school, one
of our project might be to build interfaces to the three libraries
available at multiprecision.org (by Andreas Enge and others):
- MPC
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:21 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Maarten Derickx
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote:
At the last sage-days there were some people working on making sage start up
faster. I think it would be nice to have a short piece in the
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:09 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
See sage: sage.misc.preparser.implicit_mul? for current information
(it looks like you found this).
I don't see why one couldn't have this as a level. Whether it would be
10 or 10, or maybe needs to be level 3*I, I wouldn't
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:27 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 19 Aug., 12:12, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:02:14 PM UTC+2, leif wrote:
It shouldn't be that hard to implement functions which at least
partially translate MATLAB / Mma /
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Aug 19, 12:26 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 8/19/11 1:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
[a, b; c, d].change_ring(QQ)
You'd have to take care that
[1.0001, 1.0; 2.0,
3.0
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 19 Aug., 21:26, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
But then what about:
[1, 2,
3, 4]
Note the small difference:
[1,2,
3,4]
is a list in Python. But
[1,2
3,4]
(if I am not mistaken) is a syntax
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 8/17/11 10:02 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:45 pm, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
This is now #11699:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11699
I agree with Rob; this probably should be in
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 2:57:19 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
Hmm, but maybe it should be like R's download, where it tests a few
mirrors and selects one of the faster ones.
That already happens for the upgrade
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 10 Aug., 19:34, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, maybe, there are also software solutions that can help with all
that,
but in my eyes it's better to stay simple. This way the website doesn't
depend on a
If they go all the way to a pull request model, this would probably be
a *huge* boon to getting more contributions. I for one would be more
likely to provide patches rather than just reports if I found a bug
(though that won't completely overcome the intrinsic difficulties in
getting into the
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:00 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
But I don't know enough about the order that these things happen in,
nor how to tell that from the C file, to trace it all out. Can
someone give me a sense - or show me enough of how to do it so I can
do it myself -
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 07:13 , Simon King wrote:
Hi all!
On 1 Aug., 17:18, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 8/1/11 7:19 AM, Simon King wrote:
sage-newbie, sage-solaris, sage-flame, sage-marketing and
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:42 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
The patches at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 should speed
up building the reference manual. On sage.math, applying the patches made
the build time for the html version go from just under 18 minutes
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
I'd like to spread the definition of a large multivariate symbolic
function across several input lines (because it will eventually end up
on a piece of paper - how quaint). Here is a simple example you can
drop on a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/11 3:39 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Andrei,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Andreiandrei.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably know that GitHub is extremely popular hosting for
open-source
projects
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi!
On June 27, the patchbot was applying both patches from #11342, even
though I had stated on June 26 (both in a comment and in the ticket
description) that only one patch ought to be applied.
For the time being,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 21 Jul., 23:00, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
For the time being, rename your patch to not trigger trac's
auto-wiki-linkification (i.e don't start words with a capital letter).
OK
Development Prize
(http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html) goes to Robert
Bradshaw.
Robert Bradshaw has been an extremely active and productive Sage
developer for over five years. Additionally, he has been a leader,
both in maintaining the community and in important design decisions.
He
I've updated it poll and automatically restart if (when) it hangs. I
hope to put it under the sagemath account soon.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Maarten Derickx
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote:
btw. it seems to be down again.
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:02 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
I've updated it poll and automatically restart if (when) it hangs. I
hope to put it under the sagemath account soon.
That's a good idea
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:16 PM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Hi
In a previous thread, Martin Rubey had problems running the profiler
in Cython. See
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/81d1cc666e1ffbe6/
His question seemed to have gone unresolved.
it. Basically, the header gets mangled by inserting code
at the top of your file. The same happens for __future__ directives,
it'd be nice to fix this.
On Jul 18, 9:29 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:16 PM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Francois Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Hi all,
in #11427 Mariah noticed that the result of test introduced in #10334
are actually changing when you install an optional spkg.
What would be the most sensible course of action ot solve this?
...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
It seems to have frozen again. Is there a way other people could restart
it?
David
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:30, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
It often hangs when trying to scrape trac.sagemath.org. I've restarted
it. (If you have any tickets you're
It often hangs when trying to scrape trac.sagemath.org. I've restarted
it. (If you have any tickets you're interested in, visit their pages
to make sure it has up-to-date information).
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:07 AM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes, I was having a similar problem
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On Jun 14, 7:49 pm, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2011-06-10 18:22, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Maybe pending? Is this for
positively reviewed tickets?
[...]
Is needs-info insufficient.
I think
Maybe pending? Is this for positively reviewed tickets? Is
needs-info insufficient.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
Hello,
I have created a new milestone on Trac: sage-wait meant for tickets
which are not ready to be merged, for example because
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Paul-Olivier Dehaye
pauloliv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I was looking at the patchbot for my patches, and looking at the
results for ticket 11442, I was a bit puzzled.
http://sage.math.washington.edu:21100/ticket/11442/
This happens because the bot picked up
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Paul-Olivier Dehaye
pauloliv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I was looking at the patchbot for my patches, and looking at the
results for ticket 11442, I was a bit puzzled.
http
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2011-06-08 21:23, Jason Grout wrote:
So there is already something special about where the decimal point is
placed.
Not really. My claim is that
4.00
and
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
torna...@math.utexas.edu wrote:
In sage/structure/parent_base.pyx there is a function
check_old_coerce with the following definition:
cdef inline check_old_coerce(parent.Parent p):
if p._element_constructor is not None:
raise
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
torna...@math.utexas.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
On 7 Jun., 21:25, Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu wrote:
What is the base class that one is supposed to use instead
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
On 29 Apr., 23:06, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Can you give it a shot with GF(2), so as to hit one of the smallest
possible sage Element?
Sage-4.7.alpha5 with patches:
sage: K =
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you for resuming this thread.
On 31 Mai, 08:13, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
So, the additional memory usage seems affordable to me.
Elements of small finite fields
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you for resuming this thread.
On 31 Mai, 08:13, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
So
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Kwankyu
On 29 Mai, 07:32, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought of the proposal while fixing unpickling problem of the patch for
TermOrder objects for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11316
401 - 500 of 2221 matches
Mail list logo
