Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 15:56 -0800, Roman Pearce escreveu:
A new version of Maple is only released every year, and there are lots
of people who expect their 10 year old code to run. It's almost a
Microsoft-like situation. And since people have to pay for upgrades
there's an entirely
On Feb 1, 6:18 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
with(linalg);
A := LinearAlgebra:-RandomMatrix(200);
det(A);
and it takes 30 seconds.
I know it was deprecated in Maple 6, but isn't it odd that Maple doesn't even
print a warning or something like 6 years later that one is
I guess William writes Weierstrass more often than hierarchy
John
On 1 Feb, 00:42, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William,
On 31 Jan., 19:04, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Thanks! I was scared you were going to point out 10 typos :-)
I found one:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
-bash-3.2$ maple
|\^/| Maple 12 (X86 64 LINUX)
._|\| |/|_. Copyright (c) Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple
Inc. 2008
\
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
It should print a deprecation warning so I would know. Could
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some
On Feb 1, 2009, at 4:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 4:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want to point out
On Feb 1, 12:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
On Feb 1, 1:26 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Maple's Linear Algebra is noted for not being particularly good at large
sizes. With symbolic entries, it's much worse. Thanks for these timings,
it just reinforces my idea that I should switch as soon as the calculus
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 12:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, most of the work for Sage computing dets uses IML,
not Linbox.
IML is very good. The algorithms are good :) I'm not sure what Magma
is doing, but if I had to guess, I'd say they are solving a system
AX=B
Hi William,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I just gave this Sage talk at SeaPIG (Seattle Python Interest Group --
http://www.seapig.org/NorthwestPythonDay):
http://sage.math.washington.edu/talks/20090131-seapig/
This was to about 60 people. It went
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi William,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I just gave this Sage talk at SeaPIG (Seattle Python Interest Group --
http://www.seapig.org/NorthwestPythonDay):
Hi William,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:04 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi William,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I just gave this Sage talk at SeaPIG (Seattle
Hi William,
On 31 Jan., 19:04, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Thanks! I was scared you were going to point out 10 typos :-)
I found one: heierarchy in place of hierarchy on page 8. Sorry, I
could not resist when you wrote the line above ;-)
Cheers
Simon
On Aug 9, 2007, at 24:41 , William Stein wrote:
My impression repeatedly, is that with SAGE it is best to focus as
much
as possible on young people and new users, and not worry much about
old fogies. Older people have repeatedly seen generations of failures
with free math software, so I
On 8/9/07, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 9, 2007, at 24:41 , William Stein wrote:
My impression repeatedly, is that with SAGE it is best to focus as
much
as possible on young people and new users, and not worry much about
old fogies. Older people have repeatedly
What you should have told them was that SAGE is going to eat their
lunch, then spun on your heels, and walked out.
Just kidding.
On Aug 9, 2:41 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I substantially updated the 1-hour SAGE colloquium-style talk I posted earlier
today (thanks for
19 matches
Mail list logo
