William Stein wrote:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/misc_c.pyx
**
File
/export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.0.rc0/devel/sage/sage/misc/misc_c.pyx,
line 359:
sage: test_bitset('00'*32, '01'*32, 64)
Expected:
a
William Stein wrote:
I was on the local host - sitting at the chair in front of my
workstation. No ssh/telnet or similar.
I quit sage, removed the directory .sage, then started again, using
notebook(address=, open_viewer=False)
just for a test. Again, there is nothing I can see listening
ahmet alper parker wrote:
Also, why not give them some real life example for why to use a
free/opensource program instead of a commercial one. I think this is
far more important then money. In example, one of a professor at my
university has written a program on a language which has no
If one starts Sage and types 'notebook()', I believe this should start a
server which can be used to connect via a browser.
Should the command return, giving a sage prompt, like it would if you
typed 1+1 ?
When I type 'notebook()' with 4.0-rc0 on Solaris, I get the following:
--
sage:
William Stein wrote:
Did you try
sage: notebook(secure=True)
?
I had not tried an encrypted link. I did not know Sage supported this,
and was going to mention it as potentailly useful. I can see you have
beaten me to it.
I can think of occasions where I would have liked to show
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
1) sage-4.0.rc0
hangs when generating the private key:
drkir...@kestrel:[~/sage/sage-4.0.rc0] $ ./sage
2) Using 4.0.rc1 I get a different problem - see below.
That's caused by you
FWIW,
sage-4.0.1.alpha0 compiled without any hickups on my Blade 2000 running
Solaris 10 update 6.
Again, like any version of Sage I've tried (including the binary Micheal
compiled), the GUI interface, with
'notebook()'
will not work for me. I'm unable to find any server listening on port
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Again, like any version of Sage I've tried (including the binary Micheal
compiled), the GUI interface, with
'notebook()'
will not work for me. I'm unable to find any server listening on port
8.
I was checking port 8000 - the 8 is a typo
FWIW,
sage-4.0.1.alpha0 compiled without any hickups on my Blade 2000 running
Solaris 10 update 6.
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/4 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
FWIW,
sage-4.0.1.alpha0 compiled without any hickups on my Blade 2000 running
Solaris 10 update 6.
Did you run
Dan Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5 2009 12:37 am, William Stein wrote:
Have you got an account on t2.math.washington.edu yet? If so, it
would be *extremely* useful if you could build Sage there (I haven't
yet!), since then I could directly debug this notebook problem.
Note that right now,
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5 2009 12:37 am, William Stein wrote:
Have you got an account on t2.math.washington.edu yet? If so, it
would be *extremely* useful if you could build Sage there (I haven't
yet!), since then I
Yoav Aner wrote:
Hello all,
This is my first post. My name is Yoav, and I'm studying for an
Information Security MSc at Royal Holloway, University of London. I'm
starting to work on a project proposed by Martin Albrecht, to look at
several security aspects of the Sage Notebook server.
Hi,
On Jun 5, 8:48 am, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5 2009 12:37 am, William Stein wrote:
Have you got an account on t2.math.washington.edu yet? If so, it
would be *extremely* useful if you could build Sage there (I haven't
yet!), since then I could directly debug this
Dr David Kirkby wrote:
On Jun 5, 8:48 am, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
Note that right now, building Sage fails on that machine with an
internal compiler error -- the Fortran compiler fails. There's a partial
build in /scratch/drake if you want to see an install log.
Dan
I've downloaded gcc 4.4.0 with a view to building this to try to get rid
of the internal compiler bug on the T2.
I looked at an install.log of one of my builds of Sage using the Solaris
binaries from Micheal and see the compiler was configured with:
GCC Version
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Anthony David wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I've downloaded gcc 4.4.0 with a view to building this to try to get rid
of the internal compiler bug on the T2.
As a general question to the list:
I understand that sage is designed to
I need to do some other things now, so will return to this later. But I
believe I've found some of the reasons Sage is not building on
t2.math.washington.edu whereas it does on my Blade 2000.
1) It is possible the gcc 4.3.1 binaries in
/usr/local/sparc-solaris-toolchain were created in a
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I need to do some other things now, so will return to this later. But I
believe I've found some of the reasons Sage is not building on
t2.math.washington.edu whereas it does on my Blade 2000.
Bill Hart wrote:
-bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 07 December 2005
William Stein wrote:
I have just confirmed that mark and mark2 have identical Solaris installs.
So I guess that wasn't the problem.
OK, that confirms my initial thought that the gfortran binary was too
new is wrong.
Either way, that fortran compiler is definitely a problem on t2, as even a
As some of you know, I downloaded the Solaris toochain and managed to
build sage on my Blade 2000. But Sage will not build on
t2.math.washington.edu, due to a problem with gfortran.
The Blade 2500 on which the toolchain ws build is quite a similar
machine to my Blade 2000, but t2 is quite
In most open-source program, which come as a set of source files, one
can change a file, type 'make' and the changes will be seen immediately.
In Sage, this is not so, as typing 'make' after any edits to files will
extract the original .spkg file, and overwrite ones edits. I know one
could
I've created a tool chain for Solaris on t2, which I'm hoping solves the
gfortran issues. Certainly gcc-4.4.0 will compile fortran programs now
and it seems to get a long way to building Sage, although I do have an
error I hope to fix.
If anyone wishes to use it, please sent the following
Harald Schilly wrote:
Nice and interesting article on everything2.com about free maths
software, a presentation by wolfram about mathematica and thoughts
about the reason, why mathematica is still tolerated. Link to Sage
included ;)
William Stein wrote:
6) Attempt to build Sage. This gets quite a long way but does fail at
sqlite-3.5.3.p3.
I'll put the compilation issues in another message, as I don't think it
is related to the build of gcc 4.4.0, but the order some libraries are
linked in sqlite - the error message
I'm sending this to sqlite-us...@sqlite.org in the hope someone can
help, but are copying it to sage-devel@googlegroups.com so there is a
record there. I'll post a summary to the latter list later.
I'm helping out on the GPL'ed open-source mathematics program Sage
http://www.sagemath.org/
to
I'm sending this to sqlite-us...@sqlite.org in the hope someone can
help, but are copying it to sage-devel@googlegroups.com so there is a
record there. I'll post a summary to the latter list later.
I'm helping out on the GPL'ed open-source mathematics program Sage
http://www.sagemath.org/
to
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
In Sage, this is not so, as typing 'make' after any edits to files will
extract the original .spkg file, and overwrite ones edits. I know one
could create a new .spkg file, but that
I believe I have found the problem why sqlite 3.5.3.p3 would not build
on Solaris 10 with gcc-4.4.0. That now builds on t2 at least. I
previously submitted this as a trac ticket
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
I'm not sure of the process of now getting that fix incorporated into
Dan Drake wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 at 01:35AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I believe I have found the problem why sqlite 3.5.3.p3 would not build
on Solaris 10 with gcc-4.4.0. That now builds on t2 at least. I
previously submitted this as a trac ticket
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac
After getting sqlite 3.5.3.p3 building on t2 with gcc-4.4.0, Sage is
falling over on atlas-3.8.3.p2. Before I waste any time on this, is a
fix known, or anyone have any useful information about the problem?
I'd rather not waste time on it if the reason for the failure is known,
but the fix is
Dan Drake wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 at 01:35AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I believe I have found the problem why sqlite 3.5.3.p3 would not build
on Solaris 10 with gcc-4.4.0. That now builds on t2 at least. I
previously submitted this as a trac ticket
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/13 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
What's the process of marking this as to need a review, and to find a
reviewer?
Just put
[with patch; needs review]
I've done that. I thought I'd repost the link, then made a mess of the
link, as I gave it to one
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/13 Clint Whaley wha...@cs.utsa.edu:
The actual error you guys are showing below looks more like something
really odd happened during an install: It is trying to choose a small
block factor, and has chosen 0. Looking at the place the assertion
failed, its
I know from experience that trying to build programs in parallel, with
things like
$ make -j 10
will often break them, so I tend not to do it. It's a nice idea, and
does work in some cases, but in others one just ends up with a mess.
But Sage is a big program, and takes a *long* time to
In the process of building Sage on t2, I noticed another failure, which
I'm somewhat surprised has not been seen on all platforms. I've
submitted this as ticket 6278, where more information is provided than
here.
Essentially the following packages are now installed on my attempts at
building
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I know from experience that trying to build programs in parallel, with
things like
$ make -j 10
will often break them, so I tend not to do it. It's a nice idea, and
does work in some
The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow ATLAS to build.
I could crate a patch file for that, which is only applied on Solaris,
but clearly this is not a long-term solution, as I assume it will
degrade performance on Solaris.
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/13 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
What's the process of marking this as to need a review, and to find a
reviewer?
Just put
[with patch; needs review]
I've done that. I thought I'd repost the link, then made a mess of the
link, as I gave it to one
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
In the process of building Sage on t2, I noticed another failure, which
I'm somewhat surprised has not been seen on all platforms. I've
submitted this as ticket 6278, where more information
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
nitu wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build sage-4.0.1 and getting the following error:
Build environment :
#uname -a
SunOS smath01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
Compiler used:
Sunstudio 12
cfg/shared.c: In function `store_single_arg':
cfg
This was my first patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they were supposed
to be a for list. He changed the sPKG.txt file, made a package. My code
worked
Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 at 12:17AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
This was my first patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they were
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow ATLAS to build.
I could crate a patch file for that, which is only applied on
Tristram Scott wrote:
Hi Dave,
I might be interested in working on this, but only if there is a chance
that it will be possible to get it to compile using the SunStudio
compilers. I see that at the moment the only work being done is under gcc.
Anyway, I have sun hardware, ranging from
I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
Is this to be expected?
kir...@t2:[~] $ hg
abort: couldn't find mercurial libraries in [/usr/local/bin
/usr/lib/python24.zip /usr/lib/python2.4 /usr/lib/python2.4/plat-sunos5
/usr/lib/python2.4/lib-tk /usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload
Minh Nguyen wrote:
This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
CPU speed, etc.
Would it not be sensible for Sage to at least give an option of
continuing if ATLAS can't be optimized? The fact is,
I was using t2 fine earlier (about 12 hours ago) and all seemed ok, but
any attempt for me to ssh to it now just hangs.
Note, I disabled telnet and ftp the other day on t2, as they are an
unnecessary security risk. Can someone try to ssh to t2 and let me know
what happens? It just hangs from
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I was using t2 fine earlier (about 12 hours ago) and all seemed ok, but
any attempt for me to ssh to it now just hangs.
Note, I disabled telnet and ftp the other day on t2, as
Tom Boothby wrote:
t2 is reporting 4 hours of uptime, though it wasn't responding 3 hours
ago. Fishy?
I suspect the problem was outside of t2. The machine logged no messages
at all to indicated it had problems, so perhaps a power failure was the
issue.
When the machine came up, the home
I have not developed and tested a patch which allows ATLAS to build on
Solaris using gcc-4.4.0 on 't2'. Could someone please review please the
patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6276
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I have not developed and tested a patch which allows ATLAS to build on
Solaris using gcc-4.4.0 on 't2'. Could someone please review please the
patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6276
Oops, that was supposed to be 'I have NOW developed a patch
William Stein wrote:
rm -f libbz2.a
ar cq libbz2.a blocksort.o huffman.o crctable.o randtable.o compress.o
decompress.o bzlib.o
make[2]: ar: Command not found
make[2]: *** [libbz2.a] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/wstein/t2/sage-4.0.2/spkg/build/bzip2-1.0.5'
Error building
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
In the process of building Sage on t2, I noticed another failure, which
I'm somewhat surprised has not been seen on all platforms. I've
submitted this as ticket 6278, where more information is provided than
here.
Essentially the following packages are now
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Dr. David
How can the bug be closed.
I've closed it. Only a few people have the option to close tickets right now.
William
Thank you. That's one less Solaris bug to worry over. Plenty more though
to occupy our time.
dave
Before building gcc 4.4.0 on 't2' I needed to build mpfr, as it is
perquisite for gcc.
I built the latest version of mpfr (2.4.1) using the Sun supplied gcc
3.4.2 in /usr/sfw/bin. mpfr built and passed all 148 tests.
With the aid:
1) The aid of a patch to atlas
Title pretty much says it all.
http://www.sagemath.org/
says Download 4.0.1
following the links and one finds a link to
http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/sage-4.0.2.tar
Easy to fix I guess.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Before building gcc 4.4.0 on 't2' I needed to build mpfr, as it is
perquisite for gcc.
I built the latest version of mpfr (2.4.1) using the Sun supplied gcc
3.4.2 in /usr/sfw/bin. mpfr built and passed all 148 tests.
With the aid:
1) The aid of a patch
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/21 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
In the patches directory of ntl-5.4.2.p7 there are two files which I'd
consider makefiles (i.e. make would understand them)
-rw-r- 1 kirkby 1093 443 Mar 24 2008 ntl_makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 kirkby
When I tried to build Sage on my Blade 2000 with gcc 4.4.0 configured to
use the Sun linker, so it failed to build, when building ATLAS.
make[3]: Entering directory
`/export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.0.2/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.3.p3/ATLAS-build/lib'
ld -shared -soname libatlas.so -o
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I downloaded the ATLAS source code from sourceforge, built, tested and
installed that with no problem at all. However, I note it only maked
static libraries, not shared libraries on my Sun Blade 2000.
I would add, building, testing, *tuning* and installing ATLAS
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/21 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
In the patches directory of ntl-5.4.2.p7 there are two files which I'd
consider makefiles (i.e. make would understand them)
-rw-r- 1 kirkby 1093 443 Mar 24 2008 ntl_makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
When I tried to build Sage on my Blade 2000 with gcc 4.4.0 configured to
use the Sun linker, so it failed to build, when building ATLAS.
make[3]: Entering directory
`/export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.0.2/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.3.p3/ATLAS-build/lib'
ld -shared
According to the top level README.txt
--
NOT OFFICIALLY SUPPORTED, BUT NEARLY WORKS:
PROCESSOR OPERATING SYSTEM
sparc Solaris 10 -- works fine (needs custom built gcc
toolchain)
x86_64 Solaris 10 --
From the top README.txt
---
NOT SUPPORTED:
* FreeBSD
* Arch Linux
* Gentoo Linux
* Microsoft Windows (via Visual Studio C++)
* Microsoft Windows (via Cygwin)
We like all of the above operating systems, but
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on Wikipedia.
Comparing the Sage and Mathematica pages on Wikipedia shows the
Mathematica one is much nicer. Would it not be sensible to put some
effort into promoting Sage there? If it looks like the program is more
complete, one
Some of you may be aware of Vladimir Bondarenko, who is an 'interesting'
character who can be very childish at times, but has written some
interesting software which can find faults with computer algebra systems.
He took a quick look at http://demo.sagenb.org/ as he could potentially
hook up
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
exp(-x^i).integral(x,0,1) returns
Traceback (click to the left for traceback)
...
Is %i an integer?
Ouch! Any Sage comments?
This is just coming from Maxima:
(%i3)
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on Wikipedia.
OK, based on some input from others, and what I found with Google, I
have revised the 'Features* section somewhat (and only the Features to
date).
The current page is here (this might include
kcrisman wrote:
A related page to look at would be
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer_algebra_systems
Note that Mma is declared there to be ubiquitous while Maple only
notes its libraries' sources are viewable. Our friends at Axiom even
link from there to a video!
-
As reported before, ATLAS fails to build on Solaris if the Sun linker is
used, since the flags in one of the makefiles are GNU-specific.
The patch applies 'sed' a few times to substitute the GNU flags to the
Sun flags:
-shared == -G
-soname == -h
--whole-archive == -z allextract
Robert Miller wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar
Simon King wrote:
Hi
On Jun 24, 8:33 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
A related page to look at would
behttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer_algebra_systems
I updated that somewhat, expanded the description similar to that for
Mathematica. I removed the 'Boolean
William Stein wrote:
Cheers,
Simon
Unix is tricky, as Solaris works, on some machines, but is not fully
supported. (To be precise about this, one needs a definition of 'support').
Sage works on OS X, and OS X has been officially certified to be UNIX.
There is a separate column for
Skylar Saveland wrote:
* A collection of databases of mathematical, scientific, and
socio-economic information (see below)
Man, that would be neat to have data like that at your fingertips with
a sage interface and R and Python backing you up. (and not having to
work to hard to have
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
exp(-x^i).integral(x,0,1) returns
Traceback (click to the left for traceback)
...
Is
I better buy a book on python, but in the mean time, can anyone help me
here.
In 'polibori'
/polybori-0.5rc.p7/patches/SConstruct
there is this bit of code:
def sonameprefix(env):
if env['PLATFORM']==darwin:
return -Wl,-dylib_install_name -Wl,
else:
return
#!/usr/bin/bash
if [ `uname` = SunOS -a `ld --version 21 | grep GNU` = ]; then
echo Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker
echo The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'
elif [ `uname` = darwin ]; then
echo OS X
echo Correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'
else
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
if [ `uname` = SunOS -a `ld --version 21 | grep GNU` = ]; then
echo Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker
echo The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'
elif
twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
configure script. But there is.
drkir...@kestrel:[~/sage/sage-4.1.alpha2/spkg/build/twisted-8.2.0] $ ls -l
total 9
-rw-r--r-- 1 drkirkby other 1466
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
configure script. But there is.
Oops, somehow I seem to have cut out the most important bit of the error
message, which
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
configure script. But there is.
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
configure script. But there is.
Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
Then change the function to this:
def sonameprefix(env):
if env['PLATFORM']==darwin:
return -Wl,-dylib_install_name -Wl,
elif env['PLATFORM']==what you found:
if 'GNU' in os.system('ld --version'):
return GNU flags
William Stein wrote:
2009/6/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
Then change the function to this:
def sonameprefix(env):
if env['PLATFORM']==darwin:
return -Wl,-dylib_install_name -Wl,
elif env['PLATFORM']==what you found
I just found this with sage-4.1.alpha2.
zn_poly-0.9.p0 has a problem, a GNU-specific flag (-soname) is passed to
the linker, which breaks if the linker is the Sun linker.
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libzn_poly-`cat VERSION`.so -o libzn_poly-`cat
VERSION`.so src/array.o src/invert.o
Well, is is a bit of an odd one.
I built gcc 4.4.0 to use the Sun linker assembler on my home machine
(Sun Blade 2000, Solaris 10 update 6) and it built 61 packages without
any issues I have not yet fixed. (see list at the bottom).
On 't2', I only get 6 packages built before pari generates
The SPKG.txt for mpir-1.2.p4 shows:
== Changelog ==
=== mpir-1.2.p3 (Nick Alexander, June 9, 2009) ===
* Update to latest MPIR 1.2 final release.
=== mpir-1.2.p2 (William Stein, June 4, 2009) ===
* Update to latest MPIR 1.2 pre-release
Shall this just be ignored?
Do we want a trac
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Jason Moxham wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jason Moxham
ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com
To: mpir-devel mpir-de...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:46 PM
Subject:
I noticed a problem when building 'sage-4.1.alpha2.spkg'. It complains
ld: fatal: library -lflint: not found
But the flint package indicates it was installed. However, when I tried
to build flint again, I see this error message:
Deleting old FLINT
Installing new library file
cp: illegal
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I noticed a problem when building 'sage-4.1.alpha2.spkg'. It complains
ld: fatal: library -lflint: not found
But the flint package indicates it was installed. However, when I tried
to
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I noticed a problem when building 'sage-4.1.alpha2.spkg'. It complains
ld: fatal: library -lflint: not found
But the flint package indicates it was installed. However, when I tried
to
I found that when trying to build Sage on t2.math.washington.edu there
are problems with 'mpfr', with 20 out of 148 test failures.
I downloaded the mpfr 2.4.1 source, compiled that with the same gcc
optimisation level as used in Sage (-O2). Again mpfr failed 20 tests. I
can't say for sure
Jason Grout wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I noticed a problem when building 'sage-4.1.alpha2.spkg'. It complains
ld: fatal: library -lflint: not found
But the flint package indicates
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I found that when trying to build Sage on t2.math.washington.edu there
are problems with 'mpfr', with 20 out of 148 test failures.
I downloaded the mpfr 2.4.1 source, compiled that with the same gcc
optimisation level as used in Sage (-O2). Again mpfr failed 20
Trac seems to be working for me, but if I choose:
{6} All Tickets By Milestone (Including closed)
Report execution failed: column modified does not exist LINE 16:
(CASE status WHEN 'closed' THEN modified ELSE (-1)*p... ^
I don't know if this is a new issue or not.
Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea, as it conserves disk
space.
But sometimes it is a pain. For example, I get a problem with mpfr. It
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Since -a is the same as -dpR, you might also want to use at least -r
http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?cp
Thanks,
Jason
Thank you Jason
Bill Hart wrote:
I'm confused about something. Don't we already have a Solaris port? Or
am I just confused with the OSX port?
Hi Bill,
this is current view of the situation on Solaris SPARC - I don't know
about x86/x64. Time permitting, I will look at x64 later.
There is a port of Sage to
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:21 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea
1 - 100 of 2535 matches
Mail list logo
