Anne Schilling wrote:
Anne Schilling wrote:
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:15:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had
import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore
...
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:46:28PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
It seems that you broke the sage-combinat queue again since sage does not
start after applying your latest patches.
To be more precise, sage does not run any more after applying your patch
Hi Robert,
2 weeks have passed :)
Looking forward to hear what you have to say on this.
Thanks,
Dima
On Apr 27, 5:14 am, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
I think Robert Miller is the one to ask though.
I would love to answer.. After I defend my dissertation in two weeks!
--
To
Dear Bruce, dear graph fans,
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 02:46:14PM -0700, Bruce wrote:
I am continuing a discussion in a new post.
The issue is that if we take a class such as graphs the instances
are mutable. It would be useful to have a version which was
immutable and therefore
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:13:10PM -0700, Bruce wrote:
I think I see what I need to do. Create a dummy class C which is
hashable and immutable.
Have a dictionary which has objects of C and planar graphs.
Every time I create a planar graph, see if it is isomorphic to one in
the dictionary.
If
On 05/15/10 09:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
It would be useful to have a page like this excellent page:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
William
That is very impressive.
dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On 05/16/10 07:01 AM, Paul Leopardi wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build Sage 4.4.1 from sourece, using gcc 4.4.1 on SUSE 11.2.
So far I have had two failures. I can work around the first, but have no clue
about the second.
Best, Paul
1. Problem with libreadline
Symptom:
Hi,
these are two (if not three) very different kinds of problems.
1. The readline story on OpenSuse 11.1, 11.2, ArchLinux with Sage
Looking at what was done for OpenSuse 11.1 64bit:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4946
and/or for ArchLinux
Hello,
porting Sage to Gentoo progresses well, we now have a split version
where all all dependencies of Sage are installed with portage.
Unfortunately, we experience serious problems on amd64 when exiting
Sage. When doing so, there is a slight chance of getting a SIGABRT
error, which is always
Sorry for replying to myself,
but I just found this in the current readline spkg's install script:
...
if [ -f /etc/SuSE-release ]; then
if [ `grep 11.1 /etc/SuSE-release /dev/null; echo $?` -eq 0 ];
then
echo OpenSUSE 11.1 detected
if [ -d /usr/include/readline/ ]; then
Thanks for the help. I tried again but with
export SAGE64=yes
before running make.
The only difference is that the calls to gcc now include the option -m64.
The warning and error messages are the same.
Best, Paul
--- install.2.log 2010-05-16 15:38:19.0 +1000
+++ install.log
Hi!
Since a couple of hours I try to login to Trac. I can see the tickets,
but when trying to login, the server does not answer.
Best regards,
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hello,
It may just be that some time passed since, but it works here !
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On 16 Mai, 15:59, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
It may just be that some time passed since, but it works here !
No, it is still the same. I load a ticket without problems, but when I
then click the login button, it loads forever, and no login screen
pops up.
--
To post to this
I just logged into trac ok.
John
On 16 May 2010 15:12, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
On 16 Mai, 15:59, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
It may just be that some time passed since, but it works here !
No, it is still the same. I load a ticket without problems, but when
On 16 Mai, 14:37, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
2. Symmetrica
Having a look at an install log of a successful build of the
Symmetrica spkg shows that some of the warnings are to be expected,
some not. From the logs (gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-
suse-linux
On May 16, 1:37 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
It's about time http://sagemath.org got totally reworked for improved
usability and simplicity.
A design idea from last year is here: (you need safari or firefox,
doesn't work in ie)
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/www3/
On 16 Mai, 16:16, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I just logged into trac ok.
Yes, meanwhile it works for me as well.
Cheers,
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hello everybody !!!
I have been working on a short patch to find an induced subgraph
(#8922). It is bruteforce, and is written in Cython to be a bit more
efficient. While it seems to deal very well with the few real
instances I gave it, I also tried it on home-made instances on which
it was bound
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 05:55:10AM -0700, cschwan wrote:
Hello,
porting Sage to Gentoo progresses well, we now have a split version
where all all dependencies of Sage are installed with portage.
Unfortunately, we experience serious problems on amd64 when exiting
Sage. When doing so, there
Hello,
If I add a new file into Sage without TestSuite(...).run(), then sage
-coverage shows an ERROR for this file. Does this mean that a patch
without such a test has no chances to be merged? I really hope this is
not the case yet...
I think that TestSuite is an awesome idea and it did help me
I had noticed that, after bringing a coupld of files up to 100%
coverage, it was annoying to get this Error message.
There seems to be nothing about TestSuite in the developers guide, so
it cannot (yet) be a requirement to implement it!
After trying TestSuite? I found the page in the reference
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
I work a lot with (large, say, 5000 vertices) (di)graphs having large
automorphism groups (often vertex-transitive, etc).
You should post up some examples somewhere, so I can get a sense of
Sage's performance with these
Thank you, you made my day!
Andrey
On May 16, 11:15 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I had noticed that, after bringing a coupld of files up to 100%
coverage, it was annoying to get this Error message.
There seems to be nothing about TestSuite in the developers guide, so
it
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I have been working on a short patch to find an induced subgraph
(#8922). It is bruteforce, and is written in Cython to be a bit more
efficient. While it seems to deal very well with the few real
I already tried valgrind but it did not work - how do I exactly use
it ? When I run
sage -valgrind -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
categories/examples/algebras_with_basis.rst
I get:
--
| Sage Version 4.4.1,
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 16, 1:37 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
It's about time http://sagemath.org got totally reworked for improved
usability and simplicity.
A design idea from last year is here: (you need safari or
Well,
one last try, before I give up. You should have a (temporary)
directory /home/leopardi/src/Sage/sage-4.4.1/spkg/build/
symmetrica-2.0.p5/.
In its subdirectory src/ there is a file makefile. Change its last
line (line 12) from
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -lm test.c bar.o bi.o boe.o bruch.o
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:59:24AM -0700, cschwan wrote:
I already tried valgrind but it did not work - how do I exactly use
it ? When I run
sage -valgrind -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
categories/examples/algebras_with_basis.rst
I get:
2010/5/16 cschwan csch...@students.uni-mainz.de:
I already tried valgrind but it did not work - how do I exactly use
it ? When I run
sage -valgrind -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
categories/examples/algebras_with_basis.rst
I get:
Thanks, Georg,
I moved -lm to just before -o test in the makefile for symmetrica-2.0.p5, used
tar zcf to creat a replacement spkg, and the make now continues past
symmetrica-2.0.p5. The make is still running.
I have the following environment variables defined:
SAGE64=yes
SAGE_CHECK=yes
In the makefile for symmetrica, the -lm has to go after all the .o files that
need libm.a or libm.so. This is standard practice for GNU binutils and not a
quirk of OpenSUSE, so I don't see why the build should have worked with any
other Linux distribution (remember that I have exported
Hi Georg,
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Georg S. Weber
georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
(do we have OpenSuse 11.2 64bit on the Sage build/test
farm?)
The build farm of Linux virtual machines has openSUSE 11.1 in 32- and
64-bit versions. The Skynet cluster has 64-bit openSUSE 11.1
I think Robert's said it fairly well. Which is good, since I'll have
spotty internet for the next couple weeks, and my battery is about to
run out.
On 5/15/10, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On May 14, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Robert!
On 14 Mai, 18:34,
34 matches
Mail list logo
