Hello,
I'm trying to compile Sage 6.4.1 from tarball on CentOS 6.6 and 7.0, 64-bit
architecture.
Directories owner is user sage.
Following variables are set:
export MAKE=make -j2 -l7
export SAGE_CHECK=yes
export SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS=yes
export SAGE64=yes
export SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes
While
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Hello!
In the manual (
www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/sf/monomial.html)
there is a nice example of enumerating and expanding symmetric functions in
terms of x's.
Is there a way to write the
On 16 Jan 2015 14:45, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:59 AM, 张秦川 gofortu...@gmail.com wrote:
Python can be used on windows. And sage is written in python.
So why cannot Sage run as a native application on Windows.
Because people haven't done the work to make
On 2015-01-23 22:19, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
But I think you should elaborate a bit more since the question was about
Cygwin.
I think the original question was native on Windows, i.e. without
Cygwin. This was clarified in a follow-up post.
Sage on Windows using Cygwin
On 23 Jan 2015 21:24, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2015-01-23 22:19, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
But I think you should elaborate a bit more since the question was about
Cygwin.
I think the original question was native on Windows, i.e. without Cygwin.
Hello,
using Sage 6.2 there is this behaviour:
sage: SR(2).power(3,hold=True)
2^3
sage: 3*SR(2).power(3,hold=True)
3*8
or
sage: SR(2*x).power(3,hold=True)
(2*x)^3
sage: 4 * SR(2*x).power(3,hold=True)
4*(8*x^3)
which I don't know if it is expected.
Because we want some expressions no to be
Try the following:
sage: e = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).e() # construct the symmetric functions
with the e basis
sage: m = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).m() # ditto but with the monomial basis
sage: m421 = m[4, 2, 1] # create the monomial you care about
sage: e(m421) # coerce the monomial into the
Hi all,
Can someone explain why there is an error when I try to compute an Artin
symbol which is supposed to be trivial? In the following example, I am
computing Artin symbols of some odd primes in the quadratic extension of
discriminant -4. The Artin symbols of primes $\equiv 3\bmod 4$ are
