Dear Simon,
That mean that if You to intend factorized number e.g. with 100 decimal
digits on the start probe factorization (routine time 5 second) later
algorhitm (ecm or qsieve)
Best wishes
Artur
W dniu 2011-11-28 00:14, Simon King pisze:
That is worth lost 5 second on the start ...
Do
On Tuesday, 22 November 2011 19:16:22 UTC+8, Renan Birck Pinheiro wrote:
2011/11/22 Eric Kangas eric.c...@gmail.com
it is interesting I had to compile from source on my tablet, but on my
desktop I didn't have to compile from source just had to install the
package.
Probably because
Dear all,
Is there any way to draw easily a 3D multicolor torus with Sage ?
I.e. using parametric_plot3d and an equivalent of adaptive=True,
color=rainbow(60, 'rgbtuple') options ?
Cheers,
JP
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Try installing
libreadline-dev
(this belongs to sage-support, so I cc there).
Dmitrii
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
If anything, we've probably been too cavalier with our use of Maxima's
fine-grained simplification and other routines at times; it seems
dangerous to go the other way.
At the same time, we have
sage: integrate(x^n,x,algorithm='sympy')
x^(n + 1)/(n + 1)
OK, this is a lot more usable,
On 2011-11-28 03:02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Indeed. That tablet runs Pentium M, which is kind of old nowadays.
Has the instruction set changed in recent years? I assumed it had
stabilized awhile back.
--
Anton Sherwood *\\* www.bendwavy.org *\\* www.zazzle.com/tamfang
--
To post to this
By the way, sympy seems to be a lot faster than maxima. Is there any
It shouldn't be too much faster once Maxima is started up - the first
integral will be longer because the Maxima library has to initialize,
but after that it should be quite fast.But I haven't done any
timings.
reason
On Monday, November 28, 2011 10:01:54 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
By the way, sympy seems to be a lot faster than maxima. Is there any
It shouldn't be too much faster once Maxima is started up - the first
integral will be longer because the Maxima library has to initialize,
but after that
Hi,
When I give the command for sage to plot the following cone, I get a
plot of the cone but I also get a bunch of unnecessary dots in 3D
space. These dots appear for certain cones that I plot but not
others.
Am I missing an obvious reason, or is it a bug?
Cone([(1,2,0),(0,0,-1)]).plot()
sage: c =Cone([(1,2,0),(0,0,-1)])
sage: c.plot?
Type: instancemethod
Base Class: type 'instancemethod'
String Form: bound method ConvexRationalPolyhedralCone.plot of 2-d cone in
3-d lattice N
Namespace: Interactive
File:
Currently, the following does not work for multiple functions
sage: plot([r,r^2],(r,0,3),color=['red','blue'])
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
ValueError: color list or tuple '['red', 'blue']' must have 3 entries,
one for each RGB, HSV, HLS, or HSL channel
And
On 11/28/11 12:37 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
Currently, the following does not work for multiple functions
sage: plot([r,r^2],(r,0,3),color=['red','blue'])
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
ValueError: color list or tuple '['red', 'blue']' must have 3 entries,
E=EllipticCurve([0,-82569375])
E.integral_points()
[(436 : 559 : 1), (450 : 2925 : 1), (666 : 14589 : 1), (900 : 25425 :1),
(1150 : 37925 : 1), (1800 : 75825 : 1), (2619 : 133722 : 1), (26154:
4229667 : 1), (27675 : 4603950 : 1)]
What about 748476100^3-82569375 = 20477027135825^2
Best wishes
On Nov 28, 2:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/28/11 12:37 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
Currently, the following does not work for multiple functions
sage: plot([r,r^2],(r,0,3),color=['red','blue'])
Traceback (click to the left of this block for
oops, I think I was too quick, sorry.
readline is now distributed with Sage.
So the error you got means that it was not properly installed, yet
the installation happily went further.
Could you look at install.log and find out whether readline, more precisely,
readline-6.1, installed OK?
Do
:-/ That's definitely a bug. The precision used in
integral_points_with_bounded_mw_coeffs (100 bits) is too small to find
that solution. Even bumping the precision to 120 bits suffices,
although that's probably the wrong approach:
[(436 : 559 : 1), (450 : 2925 : 1), (666 : 14589 : 1), (900 :
16 matches
Mail list logo
