[sage-support] Sage problem

apologize for my ignorance. Best wishes Artur -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

P.S. and Fedora version is 14 W dniu 2011-11-27 18:18, Simon King pisze: Hi Artur, my first impression of your post was: Not enough information (thus, virtually impossible to answer), and rather rude. Perhaps you find http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html worth reading. On 27 Nov

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

Shift + Enter doesn't work no button evaluate W dniu 2011-11-27 18:18, Simon King pisze: Hi Artur, my first impression of your post was: Not enough information (thus, virtually impossible to answer), and rather rude. Perhaps you find http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html worth

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

: 'EllipticCurve_rational_field' object has no attribute 'points' Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-27 20:00, Volker Braun pisze: You want to open http://localhost:8000 in a web browser on the host machine. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

:16:10 AM UTC-8, Artur wrote: 2+2 Work, Hurah!!! Thank You very much! Tell me how to find integral points on elliptic curve x^3-y^2=-297 Im start E=EllipticCurve([0,297]) E Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + 297 over Rational Field Now type E. and hit the TAB

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

Dear John, Mayby in manual will be all options connected in Elliptic curve E.conductor() work properly Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-27 20:21, John H Palmieri pisze: On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16:10 AM UTC-8, Artur wrote: 2+2 Work, Hurah!!! Thank You very much! Tell me how

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

OK ! I was forgot add () E=EllipticCurve([0,297]) E E.conductor() E.integral_points() work perfect . Thank You for proffessional assist! Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-27 20:21, John H Palmieri pisze: On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16:10 AM UTC-8, Artur wrote: 2+2 Work, Hurah

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

WOW! As many options! Wonderfull !!! I like SAGE! Best wishes Artur P.S. Have Sage Prime factorization algorhitms? W dniu 2011-11-27 20:29, Renan Birck Pinheiro pisze: 2011/11/27 Artur gra...@csl.pl mailto:gra...@csl.pl After Tab key on E I have following: snip You forgot the point

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

John Tell me yet is possible to count rank of my curve over rational field I was try E.mwrank bound method EllipticCurve_rational_field.mwrank of Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 W dniu 2011-11-27 20:21, John H Palmieri pisze: On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16:10 AM UTC-8, Artur wrote

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

John, Many Thanks for support! Now I have all information which I need on the start. About Integer factorizations Will be worthy to implemented to SAGE probe factorization with prime base to safe computer time. best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-27 21:41, Justin C. Walker pisze: On Nov 27

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

) need lot of time. That is worth lost 5 second on the start and lot of very big numbers can be factorized completely on this method during 5 seconds only. Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-27 22:33, Simon King pisze: Hi Artur, On 27 Nov., 22:08, Arturgra...@csl.pl wrote: John, Many Thanks

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage problem

Dear Simon, That mean that if You to intend factorized number e.g. with 100 decimal digits on the start probe factorization (routine time 5 second) later algorhitm (ecm or qsieve) Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-28 00:14, Simon King pisze: That is worth lost 5 second on the start ... Do

[sage-support] Hole in algorhitm

Artur -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Re: [sage-support] Hole in algorhitm

Dear Doug, Could You infrom me how I can increase precission in my SAGE? Best wishes Artur W dniu 2011-11-29 05:20, D. S. McNeil pisze: :-/ That's definitely a bug. The precision used in integral_points_with_bounded_mw_coeffs (100 bits) is too small to find that solution. Even bumping

Re: [sage-support] Define function in GF(q)

Hi, Thank You very much for the answer. If I'll have more troubles may I write to You? I wish you a very happy Easter! Best regards, Artur Zielinski 2012/4/7 Maarten Derickx m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com I'll give you a small example so hopefully you can figure out the rest. The following